The political dimension of "linking social capital"

current analytical practices and the case for recalibration

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This article sets out to improve our analytical understanding of the concept of “linking social capital.” Concretely, the article focuses on disaster contexts where the importance of linking social capital intensifies both for the vulnerable communities and for the local authorities concerned. Through an analysis of existing analytical practices, the article concludes that linking social capital is often subordinated to the two related social capital concepts of bonding and bridging, and that linking social capital is often exclusively defined and operationalized based on expressions of organizational trust and participation. The article proposes a recalibration to encompass the political dynamics, and political survival theory is recommended as a way to address the hitherto underexplored governance dimension. Rather than using trust as the analytical pivot, this analytical entry point may facilitate a more nuanced understanding of the potential risks inherent in the relationships between local authorities and communities in disaster settings.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftTheory and Society
Vol/bind45
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)1-21
Antal sider21
ISSN0304-2421
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 16 sep. 2016

Citer dette

@article{78f8721e8cde419da3746e828ef73eb3,
title = "The political dimension of {"}linking social capital{"}: current analytical practices and the case for recalibration",
abstract = "This article sets out to improve our analytical understanding of the concept of “linking social capital.” Concretely, the article focuses on disaster contexts where the importance of linking social capital intensifies both for the vulnerable communities and for the local authorities concerned. Through an analysis of existing analytical practices, the article concludes that linking social capital is often subordinated to the two related social capital concepts of bonding and bridging, and that linking social capital is often exclusively defined and operationalized based on expressions of organizational trust and participation. The article proposes a recalibration to encompass the political dynamics, and political survival theory is recommended as a way to address the hitherto underexplored governance dimension. Rather than using trust as the analytical pivot, this analytical entry point may facilitate a more nuanced understanding of the potential risks inherent in the relationships between local authorities and communities in disaster settings.",
author = "Olivier Rubin",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1007/s11186-016-9277-8",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "Theory and Society",
issn = "0304-2421",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "5",

}

The political dimension of "linking social capital" : current analytical practices and the case for recalibration. / Rubin, Olivier.

I: Theory and Society, Bind 45, Nr. 5, 16.09.2016, s. 1-21.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The political dimension of "linking social capital"

T2 - current analytical practices and the case for recalibration

AU - Rubin, Olivier

PY - 2016/9/16

Y1 - 2016/9/16

N2 - This article sets out to improve our analytical understanding of the concept of “linking social capital.” Concretely, the article focuses on disaster contexts where the importance of linking social capital intensifies both for the vulnerable communities and for the local authorities concerned. Through an analysis of existing analytical practices, the article concludes that linking social capital is often subordinated to the two related social capital concepts of bonding and bridging, and that linking social capital is often exclusively defined and operationalized based on expressions of organizational trust and participation. The article proposes a recalibration to encompass the political dynamics, and political survival theory is recommended as a way to address the hitherto underexplored governance dimension. Rather than using trust as the analytical pivot, this analytical entry point may facilitate a more nuanced understanding of the potential risks inherent in the relationships between local authorities and communities in disaster settings.

AB - This article sets out to improve our analytical understanding of the concept of “linking social capital.” Concretely, the article focuses on disaster contexts where the importance of linking social capital intensifies both for the vulnerable communities and for the local authorities concerned. Through an analysis of existing analytical practices, the article concludes that linking social capital is often subordinated to the two related social capital concepts of bonding and bridging, and that linking social capital is often exclusively defined and operationalized based on expressions of organizational trust and participation. The article proposes a recalibration to encompass the political dynamics, and political survival theory is recommended as a way to address the hitherto underexplored governance dimension. Rather than using trust as the analytical pivot, this analytical entry point may facilitate a more nuanced understanding of the potential risks inherent in the relationships between local authorities and communities in disaster settings.

U2 - 10.1007/s11186-016-9277-8

DO - 10.1007/s11186-016-9277-8

M3 - Journal article

VL - 45

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - Theory and Society

JF - Theory and Society

SN - 0304-2421

IS - 5

ER -