Abstract
The article explores whether sociotechnical imaginaries of digitalization
as inevitable accelerating development can be traced in Denmark’s official policy
papers concerning digitalization 2015–2020. It identifies imperatives of speed,
acceleration and agility equal to what has been described as a corporate data
imaginary as well as tropes of an imaginary of the fourth industrial revolution and inevitable exponential technological development and disruption. The empirical analysis discovers a shift in the studied period mid-2018, before which inevitabilism is prominent and after which the focus on non-economic values increases and the aim of influencing the development, instead of adapting to it, emerges. The article then addresses how imperatives of acceleration and narratives of inevitabilism may be considered problematic from a democratic point of view employing Hartmut Rosa’s critical diagnosis of the acceleration society and the notion of discursive closure. Finally, it discusses the empirical findings in light of technological determinism and constructivism inherent in the notion of sociotechnical imaginaries and introduces a sociotechnical selectionist theory allowing both for human agency in technological development while also providing a mechanism for explaining the emergence of law-like technological trends, as Moore’s Law, at macro level.
as inevitable accelerating development can be traced in Denmark’s official policy
papers concerning digitalization 2015–2020. It identifies imperatives of speed,
acceleration and agility equal to what has been described as a corporate data
imaginary as well as tropes of an imaginary of the fourth industrial revolution and inevitable exponential technological development and disruption. The empirical analysis discovers a shift in the studied period mid-2018, before which inevitabilism is prominent and after which the focus on non-economic values increases and the aim of influencing the development, instead of adapting to it, emerges. The article then addresses how imperatives of acceleration and narratives of inevitabilism may be considered problematic from a democratic point of view employing Hartmut Rosa’s critical diagnosis of the acceleration society and the notion of discursive closure. Finally, it discusses the empirical findings in light of technological determinism and constructivism inherent in the notion of sociotechnical imaginaries and introduces a sociotechnical selectionist theory allowing both for human agency in technological development while also providing a mechanism for explaining the emergence of law-like technological trends, as Moore’s Law, at macro level.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | SATS - Northern European Journal of Philosophy |
Vol/bind | 22 |
Udgave nummer | 1 |
Sider (fra-til) | 27-48 |
Antal sider | 21 |
ISSN | 1600-1974 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - 2021 |
Udgivet eksternt | Ja |