The nature of strategic communication

A rejoinder to Nothhaft

Lars T. Christensen, Emma Christensen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatFormidling

Resumé

In this article, we address and challenge Nothhaft’s (2016) recent attempt to revive the field of strategic communication through an application of approaches and principles from the studies of the human mind. Instead of an indiscriminate import of a natural science perspective, we argue that the shortcomings of the field are dealt with more adequately by recogniz- ing and embracing the immense complexity at play in all dimensions of strategic communication. The challenge is to understand the multiple goals and dimensions of the field, to acknowledge the principle of recursivity in all communicative practices, and to approach the individual not as a solitary mind, but a social being whose drives and proclivities are always socially and culturally mediated.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Strategic Communication
Vol/bind11
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)180-183
ISSN1553-118X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2017
Udgivet eksterntJa

Citer dette

@article{cb8cc523ef974a5798f30d72b307fab2,
title = "The nature of strategic communication: A rejoinder to Nothhaft",
abstract = "In this article, we address and challenge Nothhaft’s (2016) recent attempt to revive the field of strategic communication through an application of approaches and principles from the studies of the human mind. Instead of an indiscriminate import of a natural science perspective, we argue that the shortcomings of the field are dealt with more adequately by recogniz- ing and embracing the immense complexity at play in all dimensions of strategic communication. The challenge is to understand the multiple goals and dimensions of the field, to acknowledge the principle of recursivity in all communicative practices, and to approach the individual not as a solitary mind, but a social being whose drives and proclivities are always socially and culturally mediated.",
author = "Christensen, {Lars T.} and Emma Christensen",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/1553118X.2017.1318883",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "180--183",
journal = "International Journal of Strategic Communication",
issn = "1553-118X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

The nature of strategic communication : A rejoinder to Nothhaft. / Christensen, Lars T.; Christensen, Emma.

I: International Journal of Strategic Communication, Bind 11, Nr. 3, 2017, s. 180-183.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatFormidling

TY - JOUR

T1 - The nature of strategic communication

T2 - A rejoinder to Nothhaft

AU - Christensen, Lars T.

AU - Christensen, Emma

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - In this article, we address and challenge Nothhaft’s (2016) recent attempt to revive the field of strategic communication through an application of approaches and principles from the studies of the human mind. Instead of an indiscriminate import of a natural science perspective, we argue that the shortcomings of the field are dealt with more adequately by recogniz- ing and embracing the immense complexity at play in all dimensions of strategic communication. The challenge is to understand the multiple goals and dimensions of the field, to acknowledge the principle of recursivity in all communicative practices, and to approach the individual not as a solitary mind, but a social being whose drives and proclivities are always socially and culturally mediated.

AB - In this article, we address and challenge Nothhaft’s (2016) recent attempt to revive the field of strategic communication through an application of approaches and principles from the studies of the human mind. Instead of an indiscriminate import of a natural science perspective, we argue that the shortcomings of the field are dealt with more adequately by recogniz- ing and embracing the immense complexity at play in all dimensions of strategic communication. The challenge is to understand the multiple goals and dimensions of the field, to acknowledge the principle of recursivity in all communicative practices, and to approach the individual not as a solitary mind, but a social being whose drives and proclivities are always socially and culturally mediated.

U2 - 10.1080/1553118X.2017.1318883

DO - 10.1080/1553118X.2017.1318883

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 11

SP - 180

EP - 183

JO - International Journal of Strategic Communication

JF - International Journal of Strategic Communication

SN - 1553-118X

IS - 3

ER -