The Making of a Pro-cycling City

Social Practices and Bicycle Mobilities

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This article explores the contemporary co-production of bicycle practices in Copenhagen and the heterogeneous work involved in making a city pro-cycling. Attention is given as much to the sayings and doings of everyday commuters, as to planners, physical designs and campaigns. I ask: why, and how, are cycling practices continually (re)produced in Copenhagen and how can they attract so many practitioners? The first section discusses and employs practice theory, as it is well suited for examining practices of cycling. The second section explores how Copenhagen Municipality designed and scripted a cycle-friendly space by installing bike infrastructure, promoting cultural meanings and nourishing user competences. I argue that this is done through a heterogeneous process of normalizing and mainstreaming cycling and making alliances with other commuters. The third section shows how cyclists co-produce cycling practices by performing cycling and by enlisting and passing on knowledge to new practitioners. The concluding section highlights the potentials of practice theory to fully understand cycling, and it unravels some of the problems of Copenhagenizing low-cycling cities.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEnvironment and Planning A
Vol/bind49
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)876–892
ISSN0308-518X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2017

Emneord

  • Cycling
  • Practice theory
  • Mobility
  • Cities

Citer dette

@article{f750708d105646faae8eacb09fb93b8b,
title = "The Making of a Pro-cycling City: Social Practices and Bicycle Mobilities",
abstract = "This article explores the contemporary co-production of bicycle practices in Copenhagen and the heterogeneous work involved in making a city pro-cycling. Attention is given as much to the sayings and doings of everyday commuters, as to planners, physical designs and campaigns. I ask: why, and how, are cycling practices continually (re)produced in Copenhagen and how can they attract so many practitioners? The first section discusses and employs practice theory, as it is well suited for examining practices of cycling. The second section explores how Copenhagen Municipality designed and scripted a cycle-friendly space by installing bike infrastructure, promoting cultural meanings and nourishing user competences. I argue that this is done through a heterogeneous process of normalizing and mainstreaming cycling and making alliances with other commuters. The third section shows how cyclists co-produce cycling practices by performing cycling and by enlisting and passing on knowledge to new practitioners. The concluding section highlights the potentials of practice theory to fully understand cycling, and it unravels some of the problems of Copenhagenizing low-cycling cities.",
keywords = "Cycling, Practice theory, Mobility, Cities, Cycling, Practice theory, Mobility, Cities",
author = "Jonas Larsen",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1177/0308518X16682732",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "876–892",
journal = "Environment and Planning A",
issn = "0308-518X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "4",

}

The Making of a Pro-cycling City : Social Practices and Bicycle Mobilities. / Larsen, Jonas.

I: Environment and Planning A, Bind 49, Nr. 4, 2017, s. 876–892.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Making of a Pro-cycling City

T2 - Social Practices and Bicycle Mobilities

AU - Larsen, Jonas

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This article explores the contemporary co-production of bicycle practices in Copenhagen and the heterogeneous work involved in making a city pro-cycling. Attention is given as much to the sayings and doings of everyday commuters, as to planners, physical designs and campaigns. I ask: why, and how, are cycling practices continually (re)produced in Copenhagen and how can they attract so many practitioners? The first section discusses and employs practice theory, as it is well suited for examining practices of cycling. The second section explores how Copenhagen Municipality designed and scripted a cycle-friendly space by installing bike infrastructure, promoting cultural meanings and nourishing user competences. I argue that this is done through a heterogeneous process of normalizing and mainstreaming cycling and making alliances with other commuters. The third section shows how cyclists co-produce cycling practices by performing cycling and by enlisting and passing on knowledge to new practitioners. The concluding section highlights the potentials of practice theory to fully understand cycling, and it unravels some of the problems of Copenhagenizing low-cycling cities.

AB - This article explores the contemporary co-production of bicycle practices in Copenhagen and the heterogeneous work involved in making a city pro-cycling. Attention is given as much to the sayings and doings of everyday commuters, as to planners, physical designs and campaigns. I ask: why, and how, are cycling practices continually (re)produced in Copenhagen and how can they attract so many practitioners? The first section discusses and employs practice theory, as it is well suited for examining practices of cycling. The second section explores how Copenhagen Municipality designed and scripted a cycle-friendly space by installing bike infrastructure, promoting cultural meanings and nourishing user competences. I argue that this is done through a heterogeneous process of normalizing and mainstreaming cycling and making alliances with other commuters. The third section shows how cyclists co-produce cycling practices by performing cycling and by enlisting and passing on knowledge to new practitioners. The concluding section highlights the potentials of practice theory to fully understand cycling, and it unravels some of the problems of Copenhagenizing low-cycling cities.

KW - Cycling

KW - Practice theory

KW - Mobility

KW - Cities

KW - Cycling

KW - Practice theory

KW - Mobility

KW - Cities

U2 - 10.1177/0308518X16682732

DO - 10.1177/0308518X16682732

M3 - Journal article

VL - 49

SP - 876

EP - 892

JO - Environment and Planning A

JF - Environment and Planning A

SN - 0308-518X

IS - 4

ER -