The leftist fascination with Schmitt and the esoteric quality of the political

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

The article looks critically at the Schmitt revival among radical leftists, how they try to insulate his work from his political conviction and make a problematic distinction between liberalism and democracy, which undercuts the specificity of modern democracy and plays into reactionary identity politics. I then turn to how Schmitt conceptualizes the political and argue that the structure of his argument is antithetic to modern democracy. Against those who hold that it is possible to use Schmitt against himself, I argue that to adopt Schmitt for the purpose of strengthening liberal democracy runs into serious difficulties, because the whole set-up is geared to combat this regime form. Finally, I show that the political undermines right/left orientation because it is structured in terms of other orientational metaphors, which sustain a restrictive view on membership (in/out), unconditional loyalty to the state (up/down) and a strong sense of belonging and destiny (front/back).
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPhilosophy & Social Criticism
Vol/bind35
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)649-669
Antal sider21
ISSN0191-4537
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2009

Emneord

  • Carl Schmitt
  • moderne demokrati
  • Chantal Mouffe
  • ven/fjende
  • det politiske

Citer dette

@article{c9558960ee0b11dd98df000ea68e967b,
title = "The leftist fascination with Schmitt and the esoteric quality of the political",
abstract = "The article looks critically at the Schmitt revival among radical leftists, how they try to insulate his work from his political conviction and make a problematic distinction between liberalism and democracy, which undercuts the specificity of modern democracy and plays into reactionary identity politics. I then turn to how Schmitt conceptualizes the political and argue that the structure of his argument is antithetic to modern democracy. Against those who hold that it is possible to use Schmitt against himself, I argue that to adopt Schmitt for the purpose of strengthening liberal democracy runs into serious difficulties, because the whole set-up is geared to combat this regime form. Finally, I show that the political undermines right/left orientation because it is structured in terms of other orientational metaphors, which sustain a restrictive view on membership (in/out), unconditional loyalty to the state (up/down) and a strong sense of belonging and destiny (front/back).",
keywords = "Carl Schmitt, moderne demokrati, Chantal Mouffe, ven/fjende, det politiske, Carl Schmitt, modern democracy, Chantal Mouffe, friend/enemy, the political",
author = "Dyrberg, {Torben Bech}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1177/0191453709104451",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "649--669",
journal = "Philosophy & Social Criticism",
issn = "0191-4537",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "6",

}

The leftist fascination with Schmitt and the esoteric quality of the political. / Dyrberg, Torben Bech.

I: Philosophy & Social Criticism, Bind 35, Nr. 6, 2009, s. 649-669.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The leftist fascination with Schmitt and the esoteric quality of the political

AU - Dyrberg, Torben Bech

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The article looks critically at the Schmitt revival among radical leftists, how they try to insulate his work from his political conviction and make a problematic distinction between liberalism and democracy, which undercuts the specificity of modern democracy and plays into reactionary identity politics. I then turn to how Schmitt conceptualizes the political and argue that the structure of his argument is antithetic to modern democracy. Against those who hold that it is possible to use Schmitt against himself, I argue that to adopt Schmitt for the purpose of strengthening liberal democracy runs into serious difficulties, because the whole set-up is geared to combat this regime form. Finally, I show that the political undermines right/left orientation because it is structured in terms of other orientational metaphors, which sustain a restrictive view on membership (in/out), unconditional loyalty to the state (up/down) and a strong sense of belonging and destiny (front/back).

AB - The article looks critically at the Schmitt revival among radical leftists, how they try to insulate his work from his political conviction and make a problematic distinction between liberalism and democracy, which undercuts the specificity of modern democracy and plays into reactionary identity politics. I then turn to how Schmitt conceptualizes the political and argue that the structure of his argument is antithetic to modern democracy. Against those who hold that it is possible to use Schmitt against himself, I argue that to adopt Schmitt for the purpose of strengthening liberal democracy runs into serious difficulties, because the whole set-up is geared to combat this regime form. Finally, I show that the political undermines right/left orientation because it is structured in terms of other orientational metaphors, which sustain a restrictive view on membership (in/out), unconditional loyalty to the state (up/down) and a strong sense of belonging and destiny (front/back).

KW - Carl Schmitt

KW - moderne demokrati

KW - Chantal Mouffe

KW - ven/fjende

KW - det politiske

KW - Carl Schmitt

KW - modern democracy

KW - Chantal Mouffe

KW - friend/enemy

KW - the political

U2 - 10.1177/0191453709104451

DO - 10.1177/0191453709104451

M3 - Journal article

VL - 35

SP - 649

EP - 669

JO - Philosophy & Social Criticism

JF - Philosophy & Social Criticism

SN - 0191-4537

IS - 6

ER -