The interactional management of ‘language difficulties’ at work

L2 strategies for responding to explicit inquiries about understanding

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

In multilingual work-place settings, there are many ways of addressing (or not addressing) the issue of understanding, and different ways of handling when the issue is explicitly raised in the form of a question. Building on a previous study by Tranekjær (Tranekjær, 2015; Tranekjær og Kappa, 2016) of how employers in internship interviews orient to internship candidates as members of the category ‘second language speaker’, this paper examines the strategies employed by second languages speakers for refuting suspected language difficulties. Inspired by the training method CARM (Stokoe, 2011; 2013; 2014) the paper will explore the possibility of outlining differences in the efficiency of SL learner strategies for addressing inquiries about understanding. The paper in this way provides valuable input to language teachers and trainers within the field of diversity management and intercultural communication by illuminating not only the interactional trajectories of inquiries about understanding but also the interactional resources available to second language speakers of effectively ensuring intersubjectivity.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Pragmatics
Vol/bind126
Sider (fra-til)78-89
ISSN0378-2166
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018

Citer dette

@article{55a6cc41e2d44a0aa1a55ec2a606274a,
title = "The interactional management of ‘language difficulties’ at work: L2 strategies for responding to explicit inquiries about understanding",
abstract = "In multilingual work-place settings, there are many ways of addressing (or not addressing) the issue of understanding, and different ways of handling when the issue is explicitly raised in the form of a question. Building on a previous study by Tranekj{\ae}r (2015) and Tranekj{\ae}r and Kappa (2016) of how employers in internship interviews orient to internship candidates as members of the category ‘second language speaker’, this paper examines the strategies employed by second languages speakers for refuting suspected language difficulties. Inspired by the training method CARM (Stokoe, 2011, Stokoe, 2013, Stokoe, 2014) the paper will explore the possibility of outlining differences in the efficiency of SL learner strategies for addressing inquiries about understanding. The paper in this way provides valuable input to language teachers and trainers within the field of diversity management and intercultural communication by illuminating not only the interactional trajectories of inquiries about understanding but also the interactional resources available to second language speakers of effectively ensuring intersubjectivity.",
author = "Louise Tranekj{\ae}r",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.003",
language = "English",
volume = "126",
pages = "78--89",
journal = "Journal of Pragmatics",
issn = "0378-2166",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

The interactional management of ‘language difficulties’ at work : L2 strategies for responding to explicit inquiries about understanding. / Tranekjær, Louise.

I: Journal of Pragmatics, Bind 126, 2018, s. 78-89.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The interactional management of ‘language difficulties’ at work

T2 - L2 strategies for responding to explicit inquiries about understanding

AU - Tranekjær, Louise

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - In multilingual work-place settings, there are many ways of addressing (or not addressing) the issue of understanding, and different ways of handling when the issue is explicitly raised in the form of a question. Building on a previous study by Tranekjær (2015) and Tranekjær and Kappa (2016) of how employers in internship interviews orient to internship candidates as members of the category ‘second language speaker’, this paper examines the strategies employed by second languages speakers for refuting suspected language difficulties. Inspired by the training method CARM (Stokoe, 2011, Stokoe, 2013, Stokoe, 2014) the paper will explore the possibility of outlining differences in the efficiency of SL learner strategies for addressing inquiries about understanding. The paper in this way provides valuable input to language teachers and trainers within the field of diversity management and intercultural communication by illuminating not only the interactional trajectories of inquiries about understanding but also the interactional resources available to second language speakers of effectively ensuring intersubjectivity.

AB - In multilingual work-place settings, there are many ways of addressing (or not addressing) the issue of understanding, and different ways of handling when the issue is explicitly raised in the form of a question. Building on a previous study by Tranekjær (2015) and Tranekjær and Kappa (2016) of how employers in internship interviews orient to internship candidates as members of the category ‘second language speaker’, this paper examines the strategies employed by second languages speakers for refuting suspected language difficulties. Inspired by the training method CARM (Stokoe, 2011, Stokoe, 2013, Stokoe, 2014) the paper will explore the possibility of outlining differences in the efficiency of SL learner strategies for addressing inquiries about understanding. The paper in this way provides valuable input to language teachers and trainers within the field of diversity management and intercultural communication by illuminating not only the interactional trajectories of inquiries about understanding but also the interactional resources available to second language speakers of effectively ensuring intersubjectivity.

U2 - 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.003

DO - 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.003

M3 - Journal article

VL - 126

SP - 78

EP - 89

JO - Journal of Pragmatics

JF - Journal of Pragmatics

SN - 0378-2166

ER -