The elephant in the room

mapping the latent communication pattern in European Union studies

Mads Christian Dagnis Jensen, Peter Marcus Kristensen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

European Union (EU) studies is known as a fragmented and interdisciplinary field. Drawing on bibliometric methods, this article presents a novel approach to examining the alleged lines of fragmentation in EU studies. It maps the network structure arising from the citation practices in journals concerned with EU studies by analysing 2,561 documents, containing 66,162 references, published in four authoritative EU journals in the period 2003–2010. The article finds: (1) a complex network of EU and non-EU sources clustering around different bordering disciplines, particularly Political Science, Comparative Politics, International Relations and Public Administration; (2) that the two core journals – Journal of European Public Policy and Journal of Common Market Studies – play an integrating function by holding the various subfields of EU studies together; and (3) a transatlantic divide in communication practices of EU scholars.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of European Public Policy
Vol/bind20
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)1-20
Antal sider20
ISSN1350-1763
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2013
Udgivet eksterntJa

Citer dette

Jensen, Mads Christian Dagnis ; Kristensen, Peter Marcus. / The elephant in the room : mapping the latent communication pattern in European Union studies. I: Journal of European Public Policy. 2013 ; Bind 20, Nr. 1. s. 1-20.
@article{53557c043b5b4f489e04d2bc30888523,
title = "The elephant in the room: mapping the latent communication pattern in European Union studies",
abstract = "European Union (EU) studies is known as a fragmented and interdisciplinary field. Drawing on bibliometric methods, this article presents a novel approach to examining the alleged lines of fragmentation in EU studies. It maps the network structure arising from the citation practices in journals concerned with EU studies by analysing 2,561 documents, containing 66,162 references, published in four authoritative EU journals in the period 2003–2010. The article finds: (1) a complex network of EU and non-EU sources clustering around different bordering disciplines, particularly Political Science, Comparative Politics, International Relations and Public Administration; (2) that the two core journals – Journal of European Public Policy and Journal of Common Market Studies – play an integrating function by holding the various subfields of EU studies together; and (3) a transatlantic divide in communication practices of EU scholars.",
author = "Jensen, {Mads Christian Dagnis} and Kristensen, {Peter Marcus}",
year = "2013",
doi = "DOI:10.1080/13501763.2012.699656",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Journal of European Public Policy",
issn = "1350-1763",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

The elephant in the room : mapping the latent communication pattern in European Union studies. / Jensen, Mads Christian Dagnis; Kristensen, Peter Marcus.

I: Journal of European Public Policy, Bind 20, Nr. 1, 2013, s. 1-20.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The elephant in the room

T2 - mapping the latent communication pattern in European Union studies

AU - Jensen, Mads Christian Dagnis

AU - Kristensen, Peter Marcus

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - European Union (EU) studies is known as a fragmented and interdisciplinary field. Drawing on bibliometric methods, this article presents a novel approach to examining the alleged lines of fragmentation in EU studies. It maps the network structure arising from the citation practices in journals concerned with EU studies by analysing 2,561 documents, containing 66,162 references, published in four authoritative EU journals in the period 2003–2010. The article finds: (1) a complex network of EU and non-EU sources clustering around different bordering disciplines, particularly Political Science, Comparative Politics, International Relations and Public Administration; (2) that the two core journals – Journal of European Public Policy and Journal of Common Market Studies – play an integrating function by holding the various subfields of EU studies together; and (3) a transatlantic divide in communication practices of EU scholars.

AB - European Union (EU) studies is known as a fragmented and interdisciplinary field. Drawing on bibliometric methods, this article presents a novel approach to examining the alleged lines of fragmentation in EU studies. It maps the network structure arising from the citation practices in journals concerned with EU studies by analysing 2,561 documents, containing 66,162 references, published in four authoritative EU journals in the period 2003–2010. The article finds: (1) a complex network of EU and non-EU sources clustering around different bordering disciplines, particularly Political Science, Comparative Politics, International Relations and Public Administration; (2) that the two core journals – Journal of European Public Policy and Journal of Common Market Studies – play an integrating function by holding the various subfields of EU studies together; and (3) a transatlantic divide in communication practices of EU scholars.

U2 - DOI:10.1080/13501763.2012.699656

DO - DOI:10.1080/13501763.2012.699656

M3 - Journal article

VL - 20

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Journal of European Public Policy

JF - Journal of European Public Policy

SN - 1350-1763

IS - 1

ER -