The Argument for a Narrow Conception of 'Religious Autonomy'

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Abstract

Based on two recent cases at ECHR (Fernández and Syndicatul) and an american supreme court case (Hosana-Tabor) this article contributes to a special issue of OJLR on Ministerial exemption. The article is in favor of collective freedom of religion but warns against an extensive interpretation of religious autonomy and on re-introducing religious law as valid ground for exemptions from fundamental freedoms and rights
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer6
TidsskriftOxford Journal of Law and Religion
Vol/bind4
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)278-302
Antal sider25
ISSN2047-0770
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2 jun. 2015
BegivenhedThe Impact of Religion: Challenges for Society, Law and Democracy - Uppsala Universitet, Sverige
Varighed: 4 jun. 20084 jun. 2008

Konference

KonferenceThe Impact of Religion: Challenges for Society, Law and Democracy
LandSverige
ByUppsala Universitet
Periode04/06/200804/06/2008
AndetReligion, ret og samfund

Emneord

  • Freedom of religion
  • religious autonomy
  • religiious law as valid law

Citer dette