Taking Critical Ontology Seriously

Implications for Political Science Methodology

Angela Wigger, Laura Horn

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

Resumé

To be ‘critical’ has become fashionable among social scientists in various disciplines. Only a few decades ago, the prefix ‘critical’ was almost automatically associated with Western Marxism and in particular the Frankfurt School. Today, the term critical is no longer limited to a single theoretical approach, but pertains to a vast range of approaches, including feminist, reflexive, postcolonial, postmodern or poststructuralist studies, and studies committed to a post-positivist epistemology more generally. But what does critical social science actually mean? Which implications does critical research have for fundamental questions of ontology (the central premises on the constitutive elements that underpin social reality), epistemology (the assumptions about how knowledge about this reality can be produced) and methodology (how this knowledge is gathered and ordered)? This chapter offers a primer on a few core dimensions of critical social science and its central premises. It discusses first what critical social science is not, and clarifies key differences between what is commonly referred to as ‘mainstream’ and ‘critical’ social science perspectives. It addresses the role of normative claims and identifies the emancipatory commitment inherent in critical approaches as a distinguishing feature. Drawing on critical realism as an illustration of a philosophy of science and as a critical ontology, the chapter then engages with meta-theoretical questions about why critical perspectives privilege ontology over epistemology – that is, why we need to accept that social reality is constituted by complex power relations that evolve from a constant dialectical interplay of structure and agency over time, and that these power relations are revealed in both ideational and material dimensions. To illustrate what a critical ‘way of knowing’ looks like, critical feminist perspectives in political science are highlighted as concrete examples. In the concluding part, we emphasize the core arguments for indeed taking critical ontology seriously, and outline avenues for further engagement and debate.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelHandbook of Research Methods and Applications in Political Science
RedaktørerHans Keman, Jaap Woldendorp
Antal sider16
ForlagEdward Elgar Publishing
Publikationsdato2017
Sider38-53
Kapitel3
ISBN (Trykt)9781784710811
ISBN (Elektronisk)9781784710828
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2017

Citer dette

Wigger, A., & Horn, L. (2017). Taking Critical Ontology Seriously: Implications for Political Science Methodology. I H. Keman, & J. Woldendorp (red.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Political Science (s. 38-53). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784710828, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784710828.00010
Wigger, Angela ; Horn, Laura. / Taking Critical Ontology Seriously : Implications for Political Science Methodology. Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Political Science. red. / Hans Keman ; Jaap Woldendorp. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017. s. 38-53
@inbook{3d0f33ab169941f58ad613eaaeda5833,
title = "Taking Critical Ontology Seriously: Implications for Political Science Methodology",
abstract = "To be ‘critical’ has become fashionable among social scientists in various disciplines. Only a few decades ago, the prefix ‘critical’ was almost automatically associated with Western Marxism and in particular the Frankfurt School. Today, the term critical is no longer limited to a single theoretical approach, but pertains to a vast range of approaches, including feminist, reflexive, postcolonial, postmodern or poststructuralist studies, and studies committed to a post-positivist epistemology more generally. But what does critical social science actually mean? Which implications does critical research have for fundamental questions of ontology (the central premises on the constitutive elements that underpin social reality), epistemology (the assumptions about how knowledge about this reality can be produced) and methodology (how this knowledge is gathered and ordered)? This chapter offers a primer on a few core dimensions of critical social science and its central premises. It discusses first what critical social science is not, and clarifies key differences between what is commonly referred to as ‘mainstream’ and ‘critical’ social science perspectives. It addresses the role of normative claims and identifies the emancipatory commitment inherent in critical approaches as a distinguishing feature. Drawing on critical realism as an illustration of a philosophy of science and as a critical ontology, the chapter then engages with meta-theoretical questions about why critical perspectives privilege ontology over epistemology – that is, why we need to accept that social reality is constituted by complex power relations that evolve from a constant dialectical interplay of structure and agency over time, and that these power relations are revealed in both ideational and material dimensions. To illustrate what a critical ‘way of knowing’ looks like, critical feminist perspectives in political science are highlighted as concrete examples. In the concluding part, we emphasize the core arguments for indeed taking critical ontology seriously, and outline avenues for further engagement and debate.",
author = "Angela Wigger and Laura Horn",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.4337/9781784710828",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781784710811",
pages = "38--53",
editor = "Keman, {Hans } and Woldendorp, {Jaap }",
booktitle = "Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Political Science",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing",

}

Wigger, A & Horn, L 2017, Taking Critical Ontology Seriously: Implications for Political Science Methodology. i H Keman & J Woldendorp (red), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Political Science. Edward Elgar Publishing, s. 38-53. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784710828, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784710828.00010

Taking Critical Ontology Seriously : Implications for Political Science Methodology. / Wigger, Angela; Horn, Laura.

Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Political Science. red. / Hans Keman; Jaap Woldendorp. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017. s. 38-53.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Taking Critical Ontology Seriously

T2 - Implications for Political Science Methodology

AU - Wigger, Angela

AU - Horn, Laura

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - To be ‘critical’ has become fashionable among social scientists in various disciplines. Only a few decades ago, the prefix ‘critical’ was almost automatically associated with Western Marxism and in particular the Frankfurt School. Today, the term critical is no longer limited to a single theoretical approach, but pertains to a vast range of approaches, including feminist, reflexive, postcolonial, postmodern or poststructuralist studies, and studies committed to a post-positivist epistemology more generally. But what does critical social science actually mean? Which implications does critical research have for fundamental questions of ontology (the central premises on the constitutive elements that underpin social reality), epistemology (the assumptions about how knowledge about this reality can be produced) and methodology (how this knowledge is gathered and ordered)? This chapter offers a primer on a few core dimensions of critical social science and its central premises. It discusses first what critical social science is not, and clarifies key differences between what is commonly referred to as ‘mainstream’ and ‘critical’ social science perspectives. It addresses the role of normative claims and identifies the emancipatory commitment inherent in critical approaches as a distinguishing feature. Drawing on critical realism as an illustration of a philosophy of science and as a critical ontology, the chapter then engages with meta-theoretical questions about why critical perspectives privilege ontology over epistemology – that is, why we need to accept that social reality is constituted by complex power relations that evolve from a constant dialectical interplay of structure and agency over time, and that these power relations are revealed in both ideational and material dimensions. To illustrate what a critical ‘way of knowing’ looks like, critical feminist perspectives in political science are highlighted as concrete examples. In the concluding part, we emphasize the core arguments for indeed taking critical ontology seriously, and outline avenues for further engagement and debate.

AB - To be ‘critical’ has become fashionable among social scientists in various disciplines. Only a few decades ago, the prefix ‘critical’ was almost automatically associated with Western Marxism and in particular the Frankfurt School. Today, the term critical is no longer limited to a single theoretical approach, but pertains to a vast range of approaches, including feminist, reflexive, postcolonial, postmodern or poststructuralist studies, and studies committed to a post-positivist epistemology more generally. But what does critical social science actually mean? Which implications does critical research have for fundamental questions of ontology (the central premises on the constitutive elements that underpin social reality), epistemology (the assumptions about how knowledge about this reality can be produced) and methodology (how this knowledge is gathered and ordered)? This chapter offers a primer on a few core dimensions of critical social science and its central premises. It discusses first what critical social science is not, and clarifies key differences between what is commonly referred to as ‘mainstream’ and ‘critical’ social science perspectives. It addresses the role of normative claims and identifies the emancipatory commitment inherent in critical approaches as a distinguishing feature. Drawing on critical realism as an illustration of a philosophy of science and as a critical ontology, the chapter then engages with meta-theoretical questions about why critical perspectives privilege ontology over epistemology – that is, why we need to accept that social reality is constituted by complex power relations that evolve from a constant dialectical interplay of structure and agency over time, and that these power relations are revealed in both ideational and material dimensions. To illustrate what a critical ‘way of knowing’ looks like, critical feminist perspectives in political science are highlighted as concrete examples. In the concluding part, we emphasize the core arguments for indeed taking critical ontology seriously, and outline avenues for further engagement and debate.

UR - http://www.e-elgar.com/shop/handbook-of-research-methods-and-applications-in-political-science

U2 - 10.4337/9781784710828

DO - 10.4337/9781784710828

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9781784710811

SP - 38

EP - 53

BT - Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Political Science

A2 - Keman, Hans

A2 - Woldendorp, Jaap

PB - Edward Elgar Publishing

ER -

Wigger A, Horn L. Taking Critical Ontology Seriously: Implications for Political Science Methodology. I Keman H, Woldendorp J, red., Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Political Science. Edward Elgar Publishing. 2017. s. 38-53 https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784710828, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784710828.00010