Socializing affordances

A dialogue between ecological psychology, cultural-historical activity theory, and phenomenology

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

Resumé

Gibson’s notion of affordances primarily regards the person as a biological, bodily being that is seen as experiencing and (re)acting in relation to objects in the environment. This theoretical grip on reciprocity is useful for grasping the meaning of things for action and as means to analytically comprehend the inseparability of person and environment; Gibson proposes, “that to perceive the world is to coperceive oneself” (Gibson 1986:141). However, from a cultural-historical perspective it can be argued that Gibson’s theory falls short in accounting for how other persons come to serve as affordances, or how societal aspects as embedded in institutional settings play a factor in the affordance quality of the world. This, to some extent, black boxes significant aspects of human experience, as we are indeed moved, inspired, and invited for acting or perceiving ourselves in certain ways, in relation to other people, as well as to more implicit societal aspects, such as standards or norms for behaviour as they are embedded in institutional settings. Hence it can be argued that the notion of affordances needs to be expanded to further grasp the significance of not only social others, but also the societal aspects of our shared lifeworld, in relation to my sense of self.Connecting to the practice of social psychiatry, this paper intends to explore the possibility for a further development of the notion of affordances that may allow us to grasp the meaning of social others in institutional practices, in relation to an experience of self. For this endeavour, Gibson’s notion of affordances will serve as turning point, as it holds promising potential as explanatory principle of how my self-understanding is intertwined with social others.The paper unfolds as a dialogue between ecological psychology, cultural-historical activity theory and phenomenology, and it builds on elaborations proposed by Bang (2009), Kono (2009), Schmidt (2007), and Pedersen & Bang (2016).
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato2019
StatusUdgivet - 2019
BegivenhedDiverse Lineages of Existentialism II: : Critical Race, Feminist, & Continental Philosophy - Marvin Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
Varighed: 3 jun. 20195 jun. 2019
http://dleii.com

Konference

KonferenceDiverse Lineages of Existentialism II: 
LokationMarvin Center, George Washington University
LandUSA
ByWashington, DC
Periode03/06/201905/06/2019
Internetadresse

Citer dette

Pedersen, S. (2019). Socializing affordances: A dialogue between ecological psychology, cultural-historical activity theory, and phenomenology. Afhandling præsenteret på Diverse Lineages of Existentialism II: , Washington, DC, USA.
Pedersen, Sofie. / Socializing affordances : A dialogue between ecological psychology, cultural-historical activity theory, and phenomenology. Afhandling præsenteret på Diverse Lineages of Existentialism II: , Washington, DC, USA.
@conference{430ebd841f1141488661f0cb42f58e8d,
title = "Socializing affordances: A dialogue between ecological psychology, cultural-historical activity theory, and phenomenology",
abstract = "Gibson’s notion of affordances primarily regards the person as a biological, bodily being that is seen as experiencing and (re)acting in relation to objects in the environment. This theoretical grip on reciprocity is useful for grasping the meaning of things for action and as means to analytically comprehend the inseparability of person and environment; Gibson proposes, “that to perceive the world is to coperceive oneself” (Gibson 1986:141). However, from a cultural-historical perspective it can be argued that Gibson’s theory falls short in accounting for how other persons come to serve as affordances, or how societal aspects as embedded in institutional settings play a factor in the affordance quality of the world. This, to some extent, black boxes significant aspects of human experience, as we are indeed moved, inspired, and invited for acting or perceiving ourselves in certain ways, in relation to other people, as well as to more implicit societal aspects, such as standards or norms for behaviour as they are embedded in institutional settings. Hence it can be argued that the notion of affordances needs to be expanded to further grasp the significance of not only social others, but also the societal aspects of our shared lifeworld, in relation to my sense of self.Connecting to the practice of social psychiatry, this paper intends to explore the possibility for a further development of the notion of affordances that may allow us to grasp the meaning of social others in institutional practices, in relation to an experience of self. For this endeavour, Gibson’s notion of affordances will serve as turning point, as it holds promising potential as explanatory principle of how my self-understanding is intertwined with social others.The paper unfolds as a dialogue between ecological psychology, cultural-historical activity theory and phenomenology, and it builds on elaborations proposed by Bang (2009), Kono (2009), Schmidt (2007), and Pedersen & Bang (2016).",
author = "Sofie Pedersen",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
note = "null ; Conference date: 03-06-2019 Through 05-06-2019",
url = "http://dleii.com",

}

Pedersen, S 2019, 'Socializing affordances: A dialogue between ecological psychology, cultural-historical activity theory, and phenomenology' Paper fremlagt ved Diverse Lineages of Existentialism II: , Washington, DC, USA, 03/06/2019 - 05/06/2019, .

Socializing affordances : A dialogue between ecological psychology, cultural-historical activity theory, and phenomenology. / Pedersen, Sofie.

2019. Afhandling præsenteret på Diverse Lineages of Existentialism II: , Washington, DC, USA.

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

TY - CONF

T1 - Socializing affordances

T2 - A dialogue between ecological psychology, cultural-historical activity theory, and phenomenology

AU - Pedersen, Sofie

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Gibson’s notion of affordances primarily regards the person as a biological, bodily being that is seen as experiencing and (re)acting in relation to objects in the environment. This theoretical grip on reciprocity is useful for grasping the meaning of things for action and as means to analytically comprehend the inseparability of person and environment; Gibson proposes, “that to perceive the world is to coperceive oneself” (Gibson 1986:141). However, from a cultural-historical perspective it can be argued that Gibson’s theory falls short in accounting for how other persons come to serve as affordances, or how societal aspects as embedded in institutional settings play a factor in the affordance quality of the world. This, to some extent, black boxes significant aspects of human experience, as we are indeed moved, inspired, and invited for acting or perceiving ourselves in certain ways, in relation to other people, as well as to more implicit societal aspects, such as standards or norms for behaviour as they are embedded in institutional settings. Hence it can be argued that the notion of affordances needs to be expanded to further grasp the significance of not only social others, but also the societal aspects of our shared lifeworld, in relation to my sense of self.Connecting to the practice of social psychiatry, this paper intends to explore the possibility for a further development of the notion of affordances that may allow us to grasp the meaning of social others in institutional practices, in relation to an experience of self. For this endeavour, Gibson’s notion of affordances will serve as turning point, as it holds promising potential as explanatory principle of how my self-understanding is intertwined with social others.The paper unfolds as a dialogue between ecological psychology, cultural-historical activity theory and phenomenology, and it builds on elaborations proposed by Bang (2009), Kono (2009), Schmidt (2007), and Pedersen & Bang (2016).

AB - Gibson’s notion of affordances primarily regards the person as a biological, bodily being that is seen as experiencing and (re)acting in relation to objects in the environment. This theoretical grip on reciprocity is useful for grasping the meaning of things for action and as means to analytically comprehend the inseparability of person and environment; Gibson proposes, “that to perceive the world is to coperceive oneself” (Gibson 1986:141). However, from a cultural-historical perspective it can be argued that Gibson’s theory falls short in accounting for how other persons come to serve as affordances, or how societal aspects as embedded in institutional settings play a factor in the affordance quality of the world. This, to some extent, black boxes significant aspects of human experience, as we are indeed moved, inspired, and invited for acting or perceiving ourselves in certain ways, in relation to other people, as well as to more implicit societal aspects, such as standards or norms for behaviour as they are embedded in institutional settings. Hence it can be argued that the notion of affordances needs to be expanded to further grasp the significance of not only social others, but also the societal aspects of our shared lifeworld, in relation to my sense of self.Connecting to the practice of social psychiatry, this paper intends to explore the possibility for a further development of the notion of affordances that may allow us to grasp the meaning of social others in institutional practices, in relation to an experience of self. For this endeavour, Gibson’s notion of affordances will serve as turning point, as it holds promising potential as explanatory principle of how my self-understanding is intertwined with social others.The paper unfolds as a dialogue between ecological psychology, cultural-historical activity theory and phenomenology, and it builds on elaborations proposed by Bang (2009), Kono (2009), Schmidt (2007), and Pedersen & Bang (2016).

M3 - Paper

ER -

Pedersen S. Socializing affordances: A dialogue between ecological psychology, cultural-historical activity theory, and phenomenology. 2019. Afhandling præsenteret på Diverse Lineages of Existentialism II: , Washington, DC, USA.