Social Media, Deliberative Democracy and Social Mobilisation

Jørgen Lerche Nielsen, Malene Bodington, Søren Lerche, Kirsten Meyer

    Publikation: KonferencebidragKonferenceabstrakt til konferenceForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    Over the past 20 years, researchers have studied how the Internet frames

    deliberative processes. What is needed to create a framework for dialogue

    & engagement, & how can the Internet be used to create & support social

    communities? (Castells 2001, Dyson 1997, Rheingold 1993). However,

    these approaches have all taken a normative & meta-theoretical approach

    to the subject & are rarely grounded in empirical research. Much has been

    written about using social media in a rationally, purpose-driven or strategic

    way, relating it to corporations, political organisations, and the latest in

    relation to the Obama presidential campaign in 2008, where deliberative

    features were successfully used to mobilise and organise 2 millions activists through his social network, Mybo.com. However, very little literature

    addresses the deliberative processes, nor does much past research build on

    cases that have successfully used social media to mobilise people. An

    examination of Kirkeasyl (Church Asylum), a Danish social movement

    that mobilised people through social media, allows a better understanding

    of how social media can be used but also of how social media impacts the

    movements that use them. Kirkeasyl had no political affiliation, & activists

    across the political and social spectrum engaged in the movement to help

    reject, soon-to-be-deported, & deported Iraqi refugees. The movement was

    largely driven by value-based politics, action, political protest focused on

    the government, & actions directed towards the police that carried out

    political decisions. By employing social media, volunteers were found &

    mobilised for blockades and demonstrations when Iraqi refugees were

    deported, a large amount of money was collected in a very short time, &

    traditional mass media & politicians were engaged in the debate surrounding the Iraqi refugees. Based on the theories of Castells, Dyson, Rheingold,

    Ganz, & Habermas, this paper analyses Kirkeasyl as a case where social

    media was successfully used for dialogue, engagement, mobilisation, &

    as a springboard to spread the movement’s message & affect the political

    debate.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    Publikationsdato2010
    Antal sider1
    StatusUdgivet - 2010
    Begivenhed17th ISA World Congress of Sociology 2010 Göteborg - Göteborg, Sverige
    Varighed: 11 jul. 201017 jul. 2010
    Konferencens nummer: 17

    Konference

    Konference17th ISA World Congress of Sociology 2010 Göteborg
    Nummer17
    LandSverige
    ByGöteborg
    Periode11/07/201017/07/2010

    Bibliografisk note

    XVII ISA World Congress of Sociology
    Sociology on the Move
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    11 - 17 July, 2010
    Conference Abstracts
    Prepared in Cooperation with CSA Sociological Abstracts

    Sociological abstracts from CSA
    FOUNDING EDITOR: Leo P. Chall
    SUPERVISING EDITOR: Tyrone Nagai
    EDITORS: Laurel Conly, Edwin Fontanilla,
    David Miller, Matthew Ruben,
    Karen Stevens
    OPERATIONS MANAGER: Lynette Hunter
    ADVERTISING COORDINATOR: Britt Sieger
    EDITORIAL OFFICE: P.O. Box 22206, San Diego, CA 92192-0206, USA

    Emneord

    • Social Media
    • deliberative democracy
    • social mobilisation
    • communicative action
    • communities
    • network organisation
    • Web 2.0

    Citer dette

    Nielsen, J. L., Bodington, M., Lerche, S., & Meyer, K. (2010). Social Media, Deliberative Democracy and Social Mobilisation. Abstract fra 17th ISA World Congress of Sociology 2010 Göteborg , Göteborg, Sverige.
    Nielsen, Jørgen Lerche ; Bodington, Malene ; Lerche, Søren ; Meyer, Kirsten . / Social Media, Deliberative Democracy and Social Mobilisation. Abstract fra 17th ISA World Congress of Sociology 2010 Göteborg , Göteborg, Sverige.1 s.
    @conference{30bb70f8cfaa4460a39a49b8aa2bc750,
    title = "Social Media, Deliberative Democracy and Social Mobilisation",
    abstract = "Over the past 20 years, researchers have studied how the Internet framesdeliberative processes. What is needed to create a framework for dialogue& engagement, & how can the Internet be used to create & support socialcommunities? (Castells 2001, Dyson 1997, Rheingold 1993). However,these approaches have all taken a normative & meta-theoretical approachto the subject & are rarely grounded in empirical research. Much has beenwritten about using social media in a rationally, purpose-driven or strategicway, relating it to corporations, political organisations, and the latest inrelation to the Obama presidential campaign in 2008, where deliberativefeatures were successfully used to mobilise and organise 2 millions activists through his social network, Mybo.com. However, very little literatureaddresses the deliberative processes, nor does much past research build oncases that have successfully used social media to mobilise people. Anexamination of Kirkeasyl (Church Asylum), a Danish social movementthat mobilised people through social media, allows a better understandingof how social media can be used but also of how social media impacts themovements that use them. Kirkeasyl had no political affiliation, & activistsacross the political and social spectrum engaged in the movement to helpreject, soon-to-be-deported, & deported Iraqi refugees. The movement waslargely driven by value-based politics, action, political protest focused onthe government, & actions directed towards the police that carried outpolitical decisions. By employing social media, volunteers were found &mobilised for blockades and demonstrations when Iraqi refugees weredeported, a large amount of money was collected in a very short time, &traditional mass media & politicians were engaged in the debate surrounding the Iraqi refugees. Based on the theories of Castells, Dyson, Rheingold,Ganz, & Habermas, this paper analyses Kirkeasyl as a case where socialmedia was successfully used for dialogue, engagement, mobilisation, &as a springboard to spread the movement’s message & affect the politicaldebate.",
    keywords = "Social Media , deliberative democracy, social mobilisation, communicative action, communities, network organisation, Web 2.0",
    author = "Nielsen, {J{\o}rgen Lerche} and Malene Bodington and S{\o}ren Lerche and Kirsten Meyer",
    note = "XVII ISA World Congress of Sociology Sociology on the Move Gothenburg, Sweden 11 - 17 July, 2010 Conference Abstracts Prepared in Cooperation with CSA Sociological Abstracts Sociological abstracts from CSA FOUNDING EDITOR: Leo P. Chall SUPERVISING EDITOR: Tyrone Nagai EDITORS: Laurel Conly, Edwin Fontanilla, David Miller, Matthew Ruben, Karen Stevens OPERATIONS MANAGER: Lynette Hunter ADVERTISING COORDINATOR: Britt Sieger EDITORIAL OFFICE: P.O. Box 22206, San Diego, CA 92192-0206, USA ; null ; Conference date: 11-07-2010 Through 17-07-2010",
    year = "2010",
    language = "English",

    }

    Nielsen, JL, Bodington, M, Lerche, S & Meyer, K 2010, 'Social Media, Deliberative Democracy and Social Mobilisation' 17th ISA World Congress of Sociology 2010 Göteborg , Göteborg, Sverige, 11/07/2010 - 17/07/2010, .

    Social Media, Deliberative Democracy and Social Mobilisation. / Nielsen, Jørgen Lerche; Bodington, Malene; Lerche, Søren; Meyer, Kirsten .

    2010. Abstract fra 17th ISA World Congress of Sociology 2010 Göteborg , Göteborg, Sverige.

    Publikation: KonferencebidragKonferenceabstrakt til konferenceForskningpeer review

    TY - ABST

    T1 - Social Media, Deliberative Democracy and Social Mobilisation

    AU - Nielsen, Jørgen Lerche

    AU - Bodington, Malene

    AU - Lerche, Søren

    AU - Meyer, Kirsten

    N1 - XVII ISA World Congress of Sociology Sociology on the Move Gothenburg, Sweden 11 - 17 July, 2010 Conference Abstracts Prepared in Cooperation with CSA Sociological Abstracts Sociological abstracts from CSA FOUNDING EDITOR: Leo P. Chall SUPERVISING EDITOR: Tyrone Nagai EDITORS: Laurel Conly, Edwin Fontanilla, David Miller, Matthew Ruben, Karen Stevens OPERATIONS MANAGER: Lynette Hunter ADVERTISING COORDINATOR: Britt Sieger EDITORIAL OFFICE: P.O. Box 22206, San Diego, CA 92192-0206, USA

    PY - 2010

    Y1 - 2010

    N2 - Over the past 20 years, researchers have studied how the Internet framesdeliberative processes. What is needed to create a framework for dialogue& engagement, & how can the Internet be used to create & support socialcommunities? (Castells 2001, Dyson 1997, Rheingold 1993). However,these approaches have all taken a normative & meta-theoretical approachto the subject & are rarely grounded in empirical research. Much has beenwritten about using social media in a rationally, purpose-driven or strategicway, relating it to corporations, political organisations, and the latest inrelation to the Obama presidential campaign in 2008, where deliberativefeatures were successfully used to mobilise and organise 2 millions activists through his social network, Mybo.com. However, very little literatureaddresses the deliberative processes, nor does much past research build oncases that have successfully used social media to mobilise people. Anexamination of Kirkeasyl (Church Asylum), a Danish social movementthat mobilised people through social media, allows a better understandingof how social media can be used but also of how social media impacts themovements that use them. Kirkeasyl had no political affiliation, & activistsacross the political and social spectrum engaged in the movement to helpreject, soon-to-be-deported, & deported Iraqi refugees. The movement waslargely driven by value-based politics, action, political protest focused onthe government, & actions directed towards the police that carried outpolitical decisions. By employing social media, volunteers were found &mobilised for blockades and demonstrations when Iraqi refugees weredeported, a large amount of money was collected in a very short time, &traditional mass media & politicians were engaged in the debate surrounding the Iraqi refugees. Based on the theories of Castells, Dyson, Rheingold,Ganz, & Habermas, this paper analyses Kirkeasyl as a case where socialmedia was successfully used for dialogue, engagement, mobilisation, &as a springboard to spread the movement’s message & affect the politicaldebate.

    AB - Over the past 20 years, researchers have studied how the Internet framesdeliberative processes. What is needed to create a framework for dialogue& engagement, & how can the Internet be used to create & support socialcommunities? (Castells 2001, Dyson 1997, Rheingold 1993). However,these approaches have all taken a normative & meta-theoretical approachto the subject & are rarely grounded in empirical research. Much has beenwritten about using social media in a rationally, purpose-driven or strategicway, relating it to corporations, political organisations, and the latest inrelation to the Obama presidential campaign in 2008, where deliberativefeatures were successfully used to mobilise and organise 2 millions activists through his social network, Mybo.com. However, very little literatureaddresses the deliberative processes, nor does much past research build oncases that have successfully used social media to mobilise people. Anexamination of Kirkeasyl (Church Asylum), a Danish social movementthat mobilised people through social media, allows a better understandingof how social media can be used but also of how social media impacts themovements that use them. Kirkeasyl had no political affiliation, & activistsacross the political and social spectrum engaged in the movement to helpreject, soon-to-be-deported, & deported Iraqi refugees. The movement waslargely driven by value-based politics, action, political protest focused onthe government, & actions directed towards the police that carried outpolitical decisions. By employing social media, volunteers were found &mobilised for blockades and demonstrations when Iraqi refugees weredeported, a large amount of money was collected in a very short time, &traditional mass media & politicians were engaged in the debate surrounding the Iraqi refugees. Based on the theories of Castells, Dyson, Rheingold,Ganz, & Habermas, this paper analyses Kirkeasyl as a case where socialmedia was successfully used for dialogue, engagement, mobilisation, &as a springboard to spread the movement’s message & affect the politicaldebate.

    KW - Social Media

    KW - deliberative democracy

    KW - social mobilisation

    KW - communicative action

    KW - communities

    KW - network organisation

    KW - Web 2.0

    M3 - Conference abstract for conference

    ER -

    Nielsen JL, Bodington M, Lerche S, Meyer K. Social Media, Deliberative Democracy and Social Mobilisation. 2010. Abstract fra 17th ISA World Congress of Sociology 2010 Göteborg , Göteborg, Sverige.