Skandaler om miltæret

Mark Blach-Ørsten, Anker Brink Lund

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

Resumé

Historically, mediated scandals involving armed forces can be traced back at least to the Dreyfus Affair (1894–1906). This chapter, however, focuses on producing an overview of spectacles of this kind that have taken place in more recent times. More specifically, we test Thompson’s claim that fundamental changes in the power relations between the military and the news media occurred around the turn of the century, a proposal that the military sources have gained the upper hand in this mutual relationship (Kristensen & Ørsten 2007). In doing so we apply Hoskins and O’Loughlin’s (2015) theory on the three phases of medi¬ated war: broadcast war (the 1990s), diffused war (2000s), and arrested war (2010s). We find a number of mediated scandals with a focus on war and the armed forces that have cast a new and critical visibility on military and government practices. However, we also find that the most serious of these scandals became public in the age of diffused war when the internet, and new actors such as WikiLeaks, disrupted the traditional media ecology. In the present phase of arrested war, scandals seem less frequent. We discuss the possible theoretical reasons for this and suggest some possible explanations. One explanation might be that in the age of arrested war, the mediatization of the military has helped it to become better at avoiding media scandals (Crosbie 2015). Another explanation can be found in the “indexing” hypothesis (Bennett 1990) which states that most event-driven news, like scandals, quickly become constrained by routine journalistic practices such as framing stories within the range of sources and viewpoints that can be found amongst elite news sources. Finally, recent research on political scandals suggests that coverage of the more trivial, personalized ones simply outweigh the coverage of the more complex scandals such as the military ones (Entman 2012; Pollack et al. 2018).
Bidragets oversatte titelSkandaler om miltæret
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelThe Routledge Companion to Media and Scandal
RedaktørerHoward Tumber, Silvio Waisbord
Antal sider8
Udgivelses stedLondon
ForlagRoutledge
Publikationsdato2019
Sider354-361
Kapitel35
ISBN (Trykt)978-0-8153-8759-6
ISBN (Elektronisk)978-1-351-17300-1
StatusUdgivet - 2019
NavnRoutledge Media and Cultural Studies Companions

Emneord

  • Skandaler
  • Militære forhold
  • nyhedsmedier
  • medialisering

Citer dette

Blach-Ørsten, M., & Brink Lund, A. (2019). Scandals and the armed forces. I H. Tumber, & S. Waisbord (red.), The Routledge Companion to Media and Scandal (s. 354-361). London: Routledge. Routledge Media and Cultural Studies Companions
Blach-Ørsten, Mark ; Brink Lund, Anker. / Scandals and the armed forces. The Routledge Companion to Media and Scandal. red. / Howard Tumber ; Silvio Waisbord. London : Routledge, 2019. s. 354-361 (Routledge Media and Cultural Studies Companions).
@inbook{4ff6bcec99e44cd0867faf1f1501be07,
title = "Scandals and the armed forces",
abstract = "Historically, mediated scandals involving armed forces can be traced back at least to the Dreyfus Affair (1894–1906). This chapter, however, focuses on producing an overview of spectacles of this kind that have taken place in more recent times. More specifically, we test Thompson’s claim that fundamental changes in the power relations between the military and the news media occurred around the turn of the century, a proposal that the military sources have gained the upper hand in this mutual relationship (Kristensen & {\O}rsten 2007). In doing so we apply Hoskins and O’Loughlin’s (2015) theory on the three phases of medi¬ated war: broadcast war (the 1990s), diffused war (2000s), and arrested war (2010s). We find a number of mediated scandals with a focus on war and the armed forces that have cast a new and critical visibility on military and government practices. However, we also find that the most serious of these scandals became public in the age of diffused war when the internet, and new actors such as WikiLeaks, disrupted the traditional media ecology. In the present phase of arrested war, scandals seem less frequent. We discuss the possible theoretical reasons for this and suggest some possible explanations. One explanation might be that in the age of arrested war, the mediatization of the military has helped it to become better at avoiding media scandals (Crosbie 2015). Another explanation can be found in the “indexing” hypothesis (Bennett 1990) which states that most event-driven news, like scandals, quickly become constrained by routine journalistic practices such as framing stories within the range of sources and viewpoints that can be found amongst elite news sources. Finally, recent research on political scandals suggests that coverage of the more trivial, personalized ones simply outweigh the coverage of the more complex scandals such as the military ones (Entman 2012; Pollack et al. 2018).",
keywords = "Skandaler, Milit{\ae}re forhold, nyhedsmedier, medialisering, scandal, mediatization, armed conflict, News Media",
author = "Mark Blach-{\O}rsten and {Brink Lund}, Anker",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-0-8153-8759-6",
pages = "354--361",
editor = "Tumber, {Howard } and Silvio Waisbord",
booktitle = "The Routledge Companion to Media and Scandal",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Blach-Ørsten, M & Brink Lund, A 2019, Scandals and the armed forces. i H Tumber & S Waisbord (red), The Routledge Companion to Media and Scandal. Routledge, London, Routledge Media and Cultural Studies Companions, s. 354-361.

Scandals and the armed forces. / Blach-Ørsten, Mark; Brink Lund, Anker.

The Routledge Companion to Media and Scandal. red. / Howard Tumber; Silvio Waisbord. London : Routledge, 2019. s. 354-361.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Scandals and the armed forces

AU - Blach-Ørsten, Mark

AU - Brink Lund, Anker

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Historically, mediated scandals involving armed forces can be traced back at least to the Dreyfus Affair (1894–1906). This chapter, however, focuses on producing an overview of spectacles of this kind that have taken place in more recent times. More specifically, we test Thompson’s claim that fundamental changes in the power relations between the military and the news media occurred around the turn of the century, a proposal that the military sources have gained the upper hand in this mutual relationship (Kristensen & Ørsten 2007). In doing so we apply Hoskins and O’Loughlin’s (2015) theory on the three phases of medi¬ated war: broadcast war (the 1990s), diffused war (2000s), and arrested war (2010s). We find a number of mediated scandals with a focus on war and the armed forces that have cast a new and critical visibility on military and government practices. However, we also find that the most serious of these scandals became public in the age of diffused war when the internet, and new actors such as WikiLeaks, disrupted the traditional media ecology. In the present phase of arrested war, scandals seem less frequent. We discuss the possible theoretical reasons for this and suggest some possible explanations. One explanation might be that in the age of arrested war, the mediatization of the military has helped it to become better at avoiding media scandals (Crosbie 2015). Another explanation can be found in the “indexing” hypothesis (Bennett 1990) which states that most event-driven news, like scandals, quickly become constrained by routine journalistic practices such as framing stories within the range of sources and viewpoints that can be found amongst elite news sources. Finally, recent research on political scandals suggests that coverage of the more trivial, personalized ones simply outweigh the coverage of the more complex scandals such as the military ones (Entman 2012; Pollack et al. 2018).

AB - Historically, mediated scandals involving armed forces can be traced back at least to the Dreyfus Affair (1894–1906). This chapter, however, focuses on producing an overview of spectacles of this kind that have taken place in more recent times. More specifically, we test Thompson’s claim that fundamental changes in the power relations between the military and the news media occurred around the turn of the century, a proposal that the military sources have gained the upper hand in this mutual relationship (Kristensen & Ørsten 2007). In doing so we apply Hoskins and O’Loughlin’s (2015) theory on the three phases of medi¬ated war: broadcast war (the 1990s), diffused war (2000s), and arrested war (2010s). We find a number of mediated scandals with a focus on war and the armed forces that have cast a new and critical visibility on military and government practices. However, we also find that the most serious of these scandals became public in the age of diffused war when the internet, and new actors such as WikiLeaks, disrupted the traditional media ecology. In the present phase of arrested war, scandals seem less frequent. We discuss the possible theoretical reasons for this and suggest some possible explanations. One explanation might be that in the age of arrested war, the mediatization of the military has helped it to become better at avoiding media scandals (Crosbie 2015). Another explanation can be found in the “indexing” hypothesis (Bennett 1990) which states that most event-driven news, like scandals, quickly become constrained by routine journalistic practices such as framing stories within the range of sources and viewpoints that can be found amongst elite news sources. Finally, recent research on political scandals suggests that coverage of the more trivial, personalized ones simply outweigh the coverage of the more complex scandals such as the military ones (Entman 2012; Pollack et al. 2018).

KW - Skandaler

KW - Militære forhold

KW - nyhedsmedier

KW - medialisering

KW - scandal

KW - mediatization

KW - armed conflict

KW - News Media

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 978-0-8153-8759-6

SP - 354

EP - 361

BT - The Routledge Companion to Media and Scandal

A2 - Tumber, Howard

A2 - Waisbord, Silvio

PB - Routledge

CY - London

ER -

Blach-Ørsten M, Brink Lund A. Scandals and the armed forces. I Tumber H, Waisbord S, red., The Routledge Companion to Media and Scandal. London: Routledge. 2019. s. 354-361. (Routledge Media and Cultural Studies Companions).