Security or Tolerance?

The proscription of political parties in democratic states

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskning

Resumé

The paper examines the changing legal status of Sinn Féin and its successor Republican Clubs, which were, respectively, banned in 1956 and 1967, and legalized in the mid-1970s. Moving beyond the existing party ban literature’s focus on constitutional foundations and formal contours of government policy I examine deliberative processes, discursive strategies and elite and citizen preferences on party bans. To this end, I examine three hypotheses generated in research on party bans in Spain that focus on the preferences of veto players, securitization and desecuritization discourses and citizen preferences. In addition to addressing an under-researched question in the study of conflict in Northern Ireland, the article aims to develop more robust statements on the conditions under which democracies ban political parties. In a contribution securitization theory, the article argues that an institutionalist operationalization of securitization can help account for success and failure of securitization moves and sharpen conceptualization of the relationship between securitization agents and multiple audiences.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato10 apr. 2014
StatusUdgivet - 10 apr. 2014
BegivenhedEuropean Consortium for Political Research : Joint Sessions of Workshops 2014 - Universidad de Salamanca , Salamanca, Spanien
Varighed: 10 apr. 201415 apr. 2014
http://www.ecpr.eu/Events/EventDetails.aspx?EventID=12

Workshop

WorkshopEuropean Consortium for Political Research
LokationUniversidad de Salamanca
LandSpanien
BySalamanca
Periode10/04/201415/04/2014
Internetadresse

Citer dette

Bourne, A. (2014). Security or Tolerance? The proscription of political parties in democratic states. Afhandling præsenteret på European Consortium for Political Research , Salamanca, Spanien.
Bourne, Angela. / Security or Tolerance? The proscription of political parties in democratic states. Afhandling præsenteret på European Consortium for Political Research , Salamanca, Spanien.
@conference{bbe5f14883904cf7a2e2f63e8d105f28,
title = "Security or Tolerance?: The proscription of political parties in democratic states",
abstract = "The paper examines the changing legal status of Sinn F{\'e}in and its successor Republican Clubs, which were, respectively, banned in 1956 and 1967, and legalized in the mid-1970s. Moving beyond the existing party ban literature’s focus on constitutional foundations and formal contours of government policy I examine deliberative processes, discursive strategies and elite and citizen preferences on party bans. To this end, I examine three hypotheses generated in research on party bans in Spain that focus on the preferences of veto players, securitization and desecuritization discourses and citizen preferences. In addition to addressing an under-researched question in the study of conflict in Northern Ireland, the article aims to develop more robust statements on the conditions under which democracies ban political parties. In a contribution securitization theory, the article argues that an institutionalist operationalization of securitization can help account for success and failure of securitization moves and sharpen conceptualization of the relationship between securitization agents and multiple audiences.",
author = "Angela Bourne",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
day = "10",
language = "English",
note = "European Consortium of Political Research : Joint Sessions ; Conference date: 10-04-2014 Through 15-04-2014",
url = "http://www.ecpr.eu/Events/EventDetails.aspx?EventID=12",

}

Bourne, A 2014, 'Security or Tolerance? The proscription of political parties in democratic states' Paper fremlagt ved European Consortium for Political Research , Salamanca, Spanien, 10/04/2014 - 15/04/2014, .

Security or Tolerance? The proscription of political parties in democratic states. / Bourne, Angela.

2014. Afhandling præsenteret på European Consortium for Political Research , Salamanca, Spanien.

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskning

TY - CONF

T1 - Security or Tolerance?

T2 - The proscription of political parties in democratic states

AU - Bourne, Angela

PY - 2014/4/10

Y1 - 2014/4/10

N2 - The paper examines the changing legal status of Sinn Féin and its successor Republican Clubs, which were, respectively, banned in 1956 and 1967, and legalized in the mid-1970s. Moving beyond the existing party ban literature’s focus on constitutional foundations and formal contours of government policy I examine deliberative processes, discursive strategies and elite and citizen preferences on party bans. To this end, I examine three hypotheses generated in research on party bans in Spain that focus on the preferences of veto players, securitization and desecuritization discourses and citizen preferences. In addition to addressing an under-researched question in the study of conflict in Northern Ireland, the article aims to develop more robust statements on the conditions under which democracies ban political parties. In a contribution securitization theory, the article argues that an institutionalist operationalization of securitization can help account for success and failure of securitization moves and sharpen conceptualization of the relationship between securitization agents and multiple audiences.

AB - The paper examines the changing legal status of Sinn Féin and its successor Republican Clubs, which were, respectively, banned in 1956 and 1967, and legalized in the mid-1970s. Moving beyond the existing party ban literature’s focus on constitutional foundations and formal contours of government policy I examine deliberative processes, discursive strategies and elite and citizen preferences on party bans. To this end, I examine three hypotheses generated in research on party bans in Spain that focus on the preferences of veto players, securitization and desecuritization discourses and citizen preferences. In addition to addressing an under-researched question in the study of conflict in Northern Ireland, the article aims to develop more robust statements on the conditions under which democracies ban political parties. In a contribution securitization theory, the article argues that an institutionalist operationalization of securitization can help account for success and failure of securitization moves and sharpen conceptualization of the relationship between securitization agents and multiple audiences.

M3 - Paper

ER -

Bourne A. Security or Tolerance? The proscription of political parties in democratic states. 2014. Afhandling præsenteret på European Consortium for Political Research , Salamanca, Spanien.