Secular Religious Establishment: A Framework For Discussing The Compatibility of Institutional Religious Establishment with Political Secularism

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Secularism as a political doctrine claims that religion and
politics should be separated. The compatibility question is whether
secularism can accept some forms of religious establishment in the
form of institutional linkages between state and organised religion. I
argue that the answer to the compatibility question is not obvious and
requires a systematic analysis of secularism. Based on a distinction
between a general concept and specific conceptions of secularism I
offer a general structure for conceptions of secularism that incorporates
both a) basic values, e.g. political equality and freedom of conscience,
b) intermediate political principles of separation, e.g. rights to religious
liberty, and c) derived normative prescriptions, e.g. that an established
church is unacceptable. I illustrate the structure using the conceptions
of secularism advocated by Robert Audi and by Charles Taylor and
Jocelyn Maclure. Given this general structure, the normative
implications of secularism, e.g. for the compatibility question, depend
on how the basic values and political principles are specified. Different
understandings of the basic values yield different conditions for
compatibility. Some conceptions of secularism are therefore compatible
with some forms of religious establishment. I illustrate the use of the
framework for discussion of particular establishment cases and how the
framework provides a structure for the normative discussion about
which conception of secularism to accept.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftFilosofia e Questioni Pubbliche
Vol/bind3
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)119-157
Antal sider39
ISSN1591-0660
StatusUdgivet - 2013

Emneord

  • Sekularisme
  • religion og politik
  • stat og kirke
  • Lautsi
  • religionsfrihed
  • religiøse symboler

Citer dette

@article{549cabff67fa4709b305c2369723179b,
title = "Secular Religious Establishment: A Framework For Discussing The Compatibility of Institutional Religious Establishment with Political Secularism",
abstract = "Secularism as a political doctrine claims that religion and politics should be separated. The compatibility question is whether secularism can accept some forms of religious establishment in the form of institutional linkages between state and organised religion. I argue that the answer to the compatibility question is not obvious and requires a systematic analysis of secularism. Based on a distinction between a general concept and specific conceptions of secularism I offer a general structure for conceptions of secularism that incorporates both a) basic values, e.g. political equality and freedom of conscience, b) intermediate political principles of separation, e.g. rights to religious liberty, and c) derived normative prescriptions, e.g. that an established church is unacceptable. I illustrate the structure using the conceptions of secularism advocated by Robert Audi and by Charles Taylor and Jocelyn Maclure. Given this general structure, the normative implications of secularism, e.g. for the compatibility question, depend on how the basic values and political principles are specified. Different understandings of the basic values yield different conditions for compatibility. Some conceptions of secularism are therefore compatible with some forms of religious establishment. I illustrate the use of the framework for discussion of particular establishment cases and how the framework provides a structure for the normative discussion about which conception of secularism to accept.",
keywords = "Sekularisme, religion og politik, stat og kirke, Lautsi, religionsfrihed, religi{\o}se symboler, secularism, politics and religion, church and state, Lautsi, freedom of religion, religious symbols",
author = "Sune L{\ae}gaard",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "119--157",
journal = "Filosofia e Questioni Pubbliche",
issn = "1591-0660",
publisher = "Luiss Bookstore",
number = "2",

}

Secular Religious Establishment : A Framework For Discussing The Compatibility of Institutional Religious Establishment with Political Secularism. / Lægaard, Sune.

I: Filosofia e Questioni Pubbliche, Bind 3, Nr. 2, 2013, s. 119-157.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Secular Religious Establishment

T2 - A Framework For Discussing The Compatibility of Institutional Religious Establishment with Political Secularism

AU - Lægaard, Sune

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Secularism as a political doctrine claims that religion and politics should be separated. The compatibility question is whether secularism can accept some forms of religious establishment in the form of institutional linkages between state and organised religion. I argue that the answer to the compatibility question is not obvious and requires a systematic analysis of secularism. Based on a distinction between a general concept and specific conceptions of secularism I offer a general structure for conceptions of secularism that incorporates both a) basic values, e.g. political equality and freedom of conscience, b) intermediate political principles of separation, e.g. rights to religious liberty, and c) derived normative prescriptions, e.g. that an established church is unacceptable. I illustrate the structure using the conceptions of secularism advocated by Robert Audi and by Charles Taylor and Jocelyn Maclure. Given this general structure, the normative implications of secularism, e.g. for the compatibility question, depend on how the basic values and political principles are specified. Different understandings of the basic values yield different conditions for compatibility. Some conceptions of secularism are therefore compatible with some forms of religious establishment. I illustrate the use of the framework for discussion of particular establishment cases and how the framework provides a structure for the normative discussion about which conception of secularism to accept.

AB - Secularism as a political doctrine claims that religion and politics should be separated. The compatibility question is whether secularism can accept some forms of religious establishment in the form of institutional linkages between state and organised religion. I argue that the answer to the compatibility question is not obvious and requires a systematic analysis of secularism. Based on a distinction between a general concept and specific conceptions of secularism I offer a general structure for conceptions of secularism that incorporates both a) basic values, e.g. political equality and freedom of conscience, b) intermediate political principles of separation, e.g. rights to religious liberty, and c) derived normative prescriptions, e.g. that an established church is unacceptable. I illustrate the structure using the conceptions of secularism advocated by Robert Audi and by Charles Taylor and Jocelyn Maclure. Given this general structure, the normative implications of secularism, e.g. for the compatibility question, depend on how the basic values and political principles are specified. Different understandings of the basic values yield different conditions for compatibility. Some conceptions of secularism are therefore compatible with some forms of religious establishment. I illustrate the use of the framework for discussion of particular establishment cases and how the framework provides a structure for the normative discussion about which conception of secularism to accept.

KW - Sekularisme

KW - religion og politik

KW - stat og kirke

KW - Lautsi

KW - religionsfrihed

KW - religiøse symboler

KW - secularism

KW - politics and religion

KW - church and state

KW - Lautsi

KW - freedom of religion

KW - religious symbols

M3 - Journal article

VL - 3

SP - 119

EP - 157

JO - Filosofia e Questioni Pubbliche

JF - Filosofia e Questioni Pubbliche

SN - 1591-0660

IS - 2

ER -