Scrutinising usability evaluation: Does thinking aloud affect behaviour and mental workload?

Morten Hertzum, Kristin Due Hansen, Hans H. K. Andersen

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    Abstract

    Thinking aloud is widely used for usability evaluation. The validity of the method is, however, debatable because it is generally used in a relaxed way that conflicts with the prescriptions of the classic model for obtaining valid verbalizations of thought processes. This study investigates whether participants that think aloud in the classic or relaxed way behave differently compared to performing in silence. Results indicate that whereas classic thinking aloud has little or no effect on behaviour apart from prolonging tasks, relaxed thinking aloud affects behaviour in multiple ways. During relaxed thinking aloud participants took longer to solve tasks, spent a larger part of tasks on general distributed visual behaviour, issued more commands to navigate both within and between the pages of the web sites used in the experiment, and experienced higher mental workload. Implications for usability evaluation are discussed.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftBehavior and Information Technology
    Vol/bind28
    Udgave nummer2
    Sider (fra-til)165-181
    Antal sider17
    ISSN0144-929X
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 2009

    Citer dette