Sanskrit-Prakrit interaction in elementary mathematics as reflected in Arabic and Italian formulations of the rule of three – and something more on the rule elsewhere

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskning

Resumé

Sanskrit sources from Aryabhata to Bhaskara II have a standard formulation of the rule of three. However, it is clear that mathematics must also have been spoken of and performed during this period (and before) in vernacular environments, and that the two levels must have interacted – not least because the erudite astronomer-mathematicians use commercial arithmetic as the introduction to mathematics. But we have no surviving vernacular texts.
From Brahmagupta onward, however, the standard Sanskrit formulation is supplemented by the observation that two of the known magnitudes are similar in kind, and the third dissimilar. This could be an innovation made within the Sanskrit tradition, but comparison with Arabic and Italian medieval sources seems to rule this out. Instead, it must have been current in the commercial community spanning the Indian Ocean and the mediterranean – but since the Sanskrit scholars are not likely to have borrowed from Arabic traders, also in vernacular commercial arithmetic as practised within India.
So far, the story seems simple and coherent. However, if Latin twelfththirteenth-
century writings and sources from the late medieval Ibero-Provencal area are taken into account, loose ends turn up that show the simple story not to be the whole story.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftMax-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Preprint
Udgave nummer435
Antal sider24
ISSN0948-9444
StatusUdgivet - 2012
BegivenhedInternational Seminar on History of Mathematics - Ramjas College, Delhi University, Delhi, Indien
Varighed: 19 nov. 201220 nov. 2012

Konference

KonferenceInternational Seminar on History of Mathematics
LokationRamjas College, Delhi University
LandIndien
ByDelhi
Periode19/11/201220/11/2012

Bibliografisk note

faktisk publiceret i 2013

Citer dette

@article{c52ec39f3c9a4e62a19e89eeff98ebdc,
title = "Sanskrit-Prakrit interaction in elementary mathematics as reflected in Arabic and Italian formulations of the rule of three – and something more on the rule elsewhere",
abstract = "Sanskrit sources from A¯ ryabhata to Bha¯skara II have a standard formulation of the rule of three. However, it is clear that mathematics must also have been spoken of and performed during this period (and before) in vernacular environments,and that the two levels must have interacted – not least because the erudite astronomer-mathematicians use commercial arithmetic as the introduction to mathematics. But we have no surviving vernacular texts. From Brahmagupta onward, however, the standard Sanskrit formulation is supplemented by the observation that two of the known magnitudes are similar in kind, and the third dissimilar. This could be an innovation made within the Sanskrit tradition, but comparison with Arabic and Italian medieval sources seems to rule this out. Instead, it must have been current in the commercial community spanning the Indian Ocean and the mediterranean – but since the Sanskrit scholars are not likely to have borrowed from Arabic traders, also in vernacular commercialarithmetic as practised within India. So far, the story seems simple and coherent. However, if Latin twelfththirteenth-century writings and sources from the late medieval Ibero-Provencal area are taken into account, loose ends turn up that show the simple story not to be the whole story.",
author = "Jens H{\o}yrup",
note = "faktisk publiceret i 2013",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
journal = "Max-Planck-Institut f{\"u}r Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Preprint",
issn = "0948-9444",
publisher = "Max-Planck-Institut f{\"u}r Wissenschaftsgeschichte",
number = "435",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sanskrit-Prakrit interaction in elementary mathematics as reflected in Arabic and Italian formulations of the rule of three – and something more on the rule elsewhere

AU - Høyrup, Jens

N1 - faktisk publiceret i 2013

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Sanskrit sources from A¯ ryabhata to Bha¯skara II have a standard formulation of the rule of three. However, it is clear that mathematics must also have been spoken of and performed during this period (and before) in vernacular environments,and that the two levels must have interacted – not least because the erudite astronomer-mathematicians use commercial arithmetic as the introduction to mathematics. But we have no surviving vernacular texts. From Brahmagupta onward, however, the standard Sanskrit formulation is supplemented by the observation that two of the known magnitudes are similar in kind, and the third dissimilar. This could be an innovation made within the Sanskrit tradition, but comparison with Arabic and Italian medieval sources seems to rule this out. Instead, it must have been current in the commercial community spanning the Indian Ocean and the mediterranean – but since the Sanskrit scholars are not likely to have borrowed from Arabic traders, also in vernacular commercialarithmetic as practised within India. So far, the story seems simple and coherent. However, if Latin twelfththirteenth-century writings and sources from the late medieval Ibero-Provencal area are taken into account, loose ends turn up that show the simple story not to be the whole story.

AB - Sanskrit sources from A¯ ryabhata to Bha¯skara II have a standard formulation of the rule of three. However, it is clear that mathematics must also have been spoken of and performed during this period (and before) in vernacular environments,and that the two levels must have interacted – not least because the erudite astronomer-mathematicians use commercial arithmetic as the introduction to mathematics. But we have no surviving vernacular texts. From Brahmagupta onward, however, the standard Sanskrit formulation is supplemented by the observation that two of the known magnitudes are similar in kind, and the third dissimilar. This could be an innovation made within the Sanskrit tradition, but comparison with Arabic and Italian medieval sources seems to rule this out. Instead, it must have been current in the commercial community spanning the Indian Ocean and the mediterranean – but since the Sanskrit scholars are not likely to have borrowed from Arabic traders, also in vernacular commercialarithmetic as practised within India. So far, the story seems simple and coherent. However, if Latin twelfththirteenth-century writings and sources from the late medieval Ibero-Provencal area are taken into account, loose ends turn up that show the simple story not to be the whole story.

M3 - Journal article

JO - Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Preprint

JF - Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Preprint

SN - 0948-9444

IS - 435

ER -