Rhetoric in Law: Are we talking about the same thing?

Jonas Gabrielsen

Rhetoric in Law: Are we talking about the same thing?

Institut for Kommunikation og Humanistisk Videnskab

Publikation: Konferencebidrag › Konferenceabstrakt til konference › Forskning › peer review

Abstract

The bond between law and rhetoric is as old as the subjects themselves. Especially the ancient works on legal rhetoric afford, however, a too narrow depiction of the interaction between law and rhetoric as a purely instrumental discipline of communication in court. In this paper I challenge this narrow understanding of legal rhetoric and outline three distinct frames of understanding the relation between law and rhetoric

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Publikationsdato	feb. 2016
Antal sider	2
Status	Udgivet - feb. 2016
Begivenhed	Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Law, Culture and the Humanities - University of Connecticut Law School , Hartford, CT, USA Varighed: 1 apr. 2016 → 2 apr. 2016 http://law2.syr.edu/academics/centers/lch/conference.html (Link til konference)

Konference

Konference	Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Law, Culture and the Humanities
Lokation	University of Connecticut Law School
Land/Område	USA
By	Hartford, CT
Periode	01/04/2016 → 02/04/2016
Internetadresse	http://law2.syr.edu/academics/centers/lch/conference.html (Link til konference)

Bibliografisk note

Two page abstract published online at The Association for the Study of Law, Culture and the Humanities

Emneord

law and rhetoric
Retsretorik

Link til dokument

Legal_Rhetoric_Are_we_talking_about_the_same_thing.ENGForlagets udgivne version, 23,7 KB

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8WMAAb9pC-Wb3UtcmpnQ2NzWUE/view?pref=2&pli=1

Citer dette

@conference{db6d15656ca34950819311436079f55f,

title = "Rhetoric in Law: Are we talking about the same thing?",

abstract = "The bond between law and rhetoric is as old as the subjects themselves. Especially the ancient works on legal rhetoric afford, however, a too narrow depiction of the interaction between law and rhetoric as a purely instrumental discipline of communication in court. In this paper I challenge this narrow understanding of legal rhetoric and outline three distinct frames of understanding the relation between law and rhetoric",

keywords = "law and rhetoric, Retsretorik, law and rhetoric, Retsretorik",

author = "Jonas Gabrielsen",

note = "Two page abstract published online at The Association for the Study of Law, Culture and the Humanities; Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Law, Culture and the Humanities ; Conference date: 01-04-2016 Through 02-04-2016",

year = "2016",

month = feb,

language = "English",

url = "http://law2.syr.edu/academics/centers/lch/conference.html",

}

TY - ABST

T1 - Rhetoric in Law

T2 - Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Law, Culture and the Humanities

AU - Gabrielsen, Jonas

N1 - Two page abstract published online at The Association for the Study of Law, Culture and the Humanities

PY - 2016/2

Y1 - 2016/2

N2 - The bond between law and rhetoric is as old as the subjects themselves. Especially the ancient works on legal rhetoric afford, however, a too narrow depiction of the interaction between law and rhetoric as a purely instrumental discipline of communication in court. In this paper I challenge this narrow understanding of legal rhetoric and outline three distinct frames of understanding the relation between law and rhetoric

AB - The bond between law and rhetoric is as old as the subjects themselves. Especially the ancient works on legal rhetoric afford, however, a too narrow depiction of the interaction between law and rhetoric as a purely instrumental discipline of communication in court. In this paper I challenge this narrow understanding of legal rhetoric and outline three distinct frames of understanding the relation between law and rhetoric

KW - law and rhetoric

KW - Retsretorik

KW - law and rhetoric

KW - Retsretorik

M3 - Conference abstract for conference

Y2 - 1 April 2016 through 2 April 2016

ER -