Abstract
In mature symbolic algebra, from Viète onward, the handling of several algebraic unknowns was routine. Before Luca Pacioli, on the other hand, the simultaneous manipulation of three algebraic unknowns was absent from
European algebra and the use of two unknowns so infrequent that it has rarely been observed and never analyzed.
The present paper analyzes the five occurrences of two algebraic unknowns in Fibonacci’s writings; the gradual unfolding of the idea in Antonio de’Mazzinghi’s Fioretti; the distorted use in an anonymous Florentine algebra
from ca 1400; the regular appearance in the treatises of Benedetto da Firenze; and finally what little we find in Pacioli’s Perugia manuscript and in his
Summa. It asks which of these appearances of the technique can be counted as independent rediscoveries of an idea present since long in Sanskrit and Arabic
mathematics – metaphorically, to which extent they represent reinvention of the hot water already available on the cooker in the neighbour’s kitchen; and it
raises the question why the technique once it had been discovered was not cultivated – pointing to the line diagrams used by Fibonacci as a technique
that was as efficient as rhetorical algebra handling two unknowns and muchless cumbersome, at least until symbolic algebra developed, and as long as the
most demanding problems with which algebra was confronted remained the traditional recreational challenges.
European algebra and the use of two unknowns so infrequent that it has rarely been observed and never analyzed.
The present paper analyzes the five occurrences of two algebraic unknowns in Fibonacci’s writings; the gradual unfolding of the idea in Antonio de’Mazzinghi’s Fioretti; the distorted use in an anonymous Florentine algebra
from ca 1400; the regular appearance in the treatises of Benedetto da Firenze; and finally what little we find in Pacioli’s Perugia manuscript and in his
Summa. It asks which of these appearances of the technique can be counted as independent rediscoveries of an idea present since long in Sanskrit and Arabic
mathematics – metaphorically, to which extent they represent reinvention of the hot water already available on the cooker in the neighbour’s kitchen; and it
raises the question why the technique once it had been discovered was not cultivated – pointing to the line diagrams used by Fibonacci as a technique
that was as efficient as rhetorical algebra handling two unknowns and muchless cumbersome, at least until symbolic algebra developed, and as long as the
most demanding problems with which algebra was confronted remained the traditional recreational challenges.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | Ganita Bharati |
Vol/bind | 41 |
Udgave nummer | 1-2 |
Sider (fra-til) | 23-67 |
ISSN | 0970-0307 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - 2019 |