Radical Islamism and Migrant Integration in Denmark: An Empirical Inquiry

Marco Goli, Shahamak Rezaei

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

It has been suggested that alienation and failed integration may be causes of “Homegrown Radical Islamism” in Western societies. Western countries often expect that migrants and their descendants residing there as citizens will embrace or support common democratic ideals as a predicate for – or consequence of - their societal integration. Conventional wisdom suggests: “The more you associate yourself with the cherished and established goals and means, the more you will disassociate yourself from Radical Islamism”, and vice versa. We believe that, quite surprisingly, an empirical test of this idea is lacking. Based on a nationally representative sample of 1,113 young (ages 15-30) in Denmark with national ties to a “Muslim country”, this study provides empirical evidence on the validity of this common assumption.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Strategic Security
Vol/bind4
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)81-114
Antal sider33
ISSN1944-0464
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 31 dec. 2011

Citer dette

@article{cb0804d2b2e54146a1b4b72d4a78e8d5,
title = "Radical Islamism and Migrant Integration in Denmark: An Empirical Inquiry",
abstract = "It has been suggested that alienation and failed integration may be causes of “Homegrown Radical Islamism” in Western societies. Western countries often expect that migrants and their descendants residing there as citizens will embrace or support common democratic ideals as a predicate for – or consequence of - their societal integration. Conventional wisdom suggests: “The more you associate yourself with the cherished and established goals and means, the more you will disassociate yourself from Radical Islamism”, and vice versa. We believe that, quite surprisingly, an empirical test of this idea is lacking. Based on a nationally representative sample of 1,113 young (ages 15-30) in Denmark with national ties to a “Muslim country”, this study provides empirical evidence on the validity of this common assumption.",
author = "Marco Goli and Shahamak Rezaei",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "31",
doi = "10.5038/1944-0472.4.4.4",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "81--114",
journal = "Journal of Strategic Security",
issn = "1944-0464",
publisher = "Henley-Putnam University Press",
number = "4",

}

Radical Islamism and Migrant Integration in Denmark : An Empirical Inquiry. / Goli, Marco; Rezaei, Shahamak.

I: Journal of Strategic Security, Bind 4, Nr. 4, 31.12.2011, s. 81-114.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radical Islamism and Migrant Integration in Denmark

T2 - An Empirical Inquiry

AU - Goli, Marco

AU - Rezaei, Shahamak

PY - 2011/12/31

Y1 - 2011/12/31

N2 - It has been suggested that alienation and failed integration may be causes of “Homegrown Radical Islamism” in Western societies. Western countries often expect that migrants and their descendants residing there as citizens will embrace or support common democratic ideals as a predicate for – or consequence of - their societal integration. Conventional wisdom suggests: “The more you associate yourself with the cherished and established goals and means, the more you will disassociate yourself from Radical Islamism”, and vice versa. We believe that, quite surprisingly, an empirical test of this idea is lacking. Based on a nationally representative sample of 1,113 young (ages 15-30) in Denmark with national ties to a “Muslim country”, this study provides empirical evidence on the validity of this common assumption.

AB - It has been suggested that alienation and failed integration may be causes of “Homegrown Radical Islamism” in Western societies. Western countries often expect that migrants and their descendants residing there as citizens will embrace or support common democratic ideals as a predicate for – or consequence of - their societal integration. Conventional wisdom suggests: “The more you associate yourself with the cherished and established goals and means, the more you will disassociate yourself from Radical Islamism”, and vice versa. We believe that, quite surprisingly, an empirical test of this idea is lacking. Based on a nationally representative sample of 1,113 young (ages 15-30) in Denmark with national ties to a “Muslim country”, this study provides empirical evidence on the validity of this common assumption.

U2 - 10.5038/1944-0472.4.4.4

DO - 10.5038/1944-0472.4.4.4

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

SP - 81

EP - 114

JO - Journal of Strategic Security

JF - Journal of Strategic Security

SN - 1944-0464

IS - 4

ER -