Quantitative differences in think tank dissemination activities in Germany, Denmark and the UK

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

In recent years, the study of policy advisory systems has been advanced conceptually and analytically through studies of externalisation and politicisation. Still, the understanding of institutional variation in how organisations supply policy advice remains limited. The contribution adds to recent research on think and the study of policy advice by arguing for a focus on the dissemination of policy advice by asking how the dissemination activities of think tanks vary across different policy advisory systems and what this implies for the study of policy advice. This question is explored in a quantitative design which compares publications, events and newspaper mentionings of samples of think tanks from a coordinated (Germany), liberal (UK) and mixed (Denmark) system in 2012. The analysis indicates that think tanks in the UK have the highest level of dissemination on all three activities when controlled for the number of full-time staff. The study indicates that factors beyond the policy process such as developments of funding and media environments should be analysed further as they are likely to be important for how and where think tank disseminate their policy advice.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPolicy Sciences
Vol/bind50
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)125-137
ISSN0032-2687
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2017

Citer dette

@article{e32b3277d4b24565b5138075a052e027,
title = "Quantitative differences in think tank dissemination activities in Germany, Denmark and the UK",
abstract = "In recent years, the study of policy advisory systems has been advanced conceptually and analytically through studies of externalisation and politicisation. Still, the understanding of institutional variation in how organisations supply policy advice remains limited. The contribution adds to recent research on think and the study of policy advice by arguing for a focus on the dissemination of policy advice by asking how the dissemination activities of think tanks vary across different policy advisory systems and what this implies for the study of policy advice. This question is explored in a quantitative design which compares publications, events and newspaper mentionings of samples of think tanks from a coordinated (Germany), liberal (UK) and mixed (Denmark) system in 2012. The analysis indicates that think tanks in the UK have the highest level of dissemination on all three activities when controlled for the number of full-time staff. The study indicates that factors beyond the policy process such as developments of funding and media environments should be analysed further as they are likely to be important for how and where think tank disseminate their policy advice.",
author = "Kelstrup, {Jesper Dahl}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/s11077-016-9254-0",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "125--137",
journal = "Policy Sciences",
issn = "0032-2687",
publisher = "Springer New York LLC",
number = "1",

}

Quantitative differences in think tank dissemination activities in Germany, Denmark and the UK. / Kelstrup, Jesper Dahl.

I: Policy Sciences, Bind 50, Nr. 1, 2017, s. 125-137.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative differences in think tank dissemination activities in Germany, Denmark and the UK

AU - Kelstrup, Jesper Dahl

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - In recent years, the study of policy advisory systems has been advanced conceptually and analytically through studies of externalisation and politicisation. Still, the understanding of institutional variation in how organisations supply policy advice remains limited. The contribution adds to recent research on think and the study of policy advice by arguing for a focus on the dissemination of policy advice by asking how the dissemination activities of think tanks vary across different policy advisory systems and what this implies for the study of policy advice. This question is explored in a quantitative design which compares publications, events and newspaper mentionings of samples of think tanks from a coordinated (Germany), liberal (UK) and mixed (Denmark) system in 2012. The analysis indicates that think tanks in the UK have the highest level of dissemination on all three activities when controlled for the number of full-time staff. The study indicates that factors beyond the policy process such as developments of funding and media environments should be analysed further as they are likely to be important for how and where think tank disseminate their policy advice.

AB - In recent years, the study of policy advisory systems has been advanced conceptually and analytically through studies of externalisation and politicisation. Still, the understanding of institutional variation in how organisations supply policy advice remains limited. The contribution adds to recent research on think and the study of policy advice by arguing for a focus on the dissemination of policy advice by asking how the dissemination activities of think tanks vary across different policy advisory systems and what this implies for the study of policy advice. This question is explored in a quantitative design which compares publications, events and newspaper mentionings of samples of think tanks from a coordinated (Germany), liberal (UK) and mixed (Denmark) system in 2012. The analysis indicates that think tanks in the UK have the highest level of dissemination on all three activities when controlled for the number of full-time staff. The study indicates that factors beyond the policy process such as developments of funding and media environments should be analysed further as they are likely to be important for how and where think tank disseminate their policy advice.

U2 - 10.1007/s11077-016-9254-0

DO - 10.1007/s11077-016-9254-0

M3 - Journal article

VL - 50

SP - 125

EP - 137

JO - Policy Sciences

JF - Policy Sciences

SN - 0032-2687

IS - 1

ER -