Punishing adolescents

On immaturity and diminished responsibility

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Should an adolescent offender be punished more leniently than an adult offender? Many theorists believe the answer to be in the affirmative. According to the diminished culpability model, adolescents are less mature than adults and, therefore, less responsible for their wrongdoings and should consequently be punished less harshly. This article concerns the first part of the model: the relation between immaturity and diminished responsibility. It is argued that this relation faces three normative challenges which do not allow for easy answers and which are still widely ignored in the comprehensive discussion of the diminished culpability model.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftNeuroethics
Vol/bind7
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)327-336
ISSN1874-5490
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2014

Citer dette

@article{d593637c7bf6470e9cc810a83368d413,
title = "Punishing adolescents: On immaturity and diminished responsibility",
abstract = "Should an adolescent offender be punished more leniently than an adult offender? Many theorists believe the answer to be in the affirmative. According to the diminished culpability model, adolescents are less mature than adults and, therefore, less responsible for their wrongdoings and should consequently be punished less harshly. This article concerns the first part of the model: the relation between immaturity and diminished responsibility. It is argued that this relation faces three normative challenges which do not allow for easy answers and which are still widely ignored in the comprehensive discussion of the diminished culpability model.",
keywords = "Adolescent offenders, Diminished responsibility, Immaturity, Punishment, Retributivism",
author = "Jesper Ryberg",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s12152-014-9203-6",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "327--336",
journal = "Neuroethics",
issn = "1874-5490",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

Punishing adolescents : On immaturity and diminished responsibility. / Ryberg, Jesper.

I: Neuroethics, Bind 7, Nr. 3, 2014, s. 327-336.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Punishing adolescents

T2 - On immaturity and diminished responsibility

AU - Ryberg, Jesper

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Should an adolescent offender be punished more leniently than an adult offender? Many theorists believe the answer to be in the affirmative. According to the diminished culpability model, adolescents are less mature than adults and, therefore, less responsible for their wrongdoings and should consequently be punished less harshly. This article concerns the first part of the model: the relation between immaturity and diminished responsibility. It is argued that this relation faces three normative challenges which do not allow for easy answers and which are still widely ignored in the comprehensive discussion of the diminished culpability model.

AB - Should an adolescent offender be punished more leniently than an adult offender? Many theorists believe the answer to be in the affirmative. According to the diminished culpability model, adolescents are less mature than adults and, therefore, less responsible for their wrongdoings and should consequently be punished less harshly. This article concerns the first part of the model: the relation between immaturity and diminished responsibility. It is argued that this relation faces three normative challenges which do not allow for easy answers and which are still widely ignored in the comprehensive discussion of the diminished culpability model.

KW - Adolescent offenders

KW - Diminished responsibility

KW - Immaturity

KW - Punishment

KW - Retributivism

U2 - 10.1007/s12152-014-9203-6

DO - 10.1007/s12152-014-9203-6

M3 - Journal article

VL - 7

SP - 327

EP - 336

JO - Neuroethics

JF - Neuroethics

SN - 1874-5490

IS - 3

ER -