Public/private ownership and quality of care: Evidence from Danish nursing homes

Ulf Hjelmar, Yosef Bhatti, Ole Helby Petersen, Tine Rostgaard, Karsten Vrangbæk

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

The involvement of private for-profit (FP) and not-for-profit (NFP) providers in the otherwise public delivery of welfare services is gradually changing the Nordic welfare state towards a more market-oriented mode of service delivery. This article examines the relationship between ownership and quality of care in public and private FP and NFP nursing homes in Denmark. The analysis draws on original survey data and administrative registry data (quality inspection reports) for the full population of almost 1000 nursing homes in Denmark. Quality is measured in terms of structural quality, process quality and outcome quality. We find that public nursing homes have a higher structural quality (in terms of, for instance, staffing), while FP providers perform better in terms of process quality (e.g. in the form of individualised care). NFP providers perform well in terms of structural criteria such as employment of full-time staff and receive fewer critical comments in the inspection reports. However, the results depend to some extent upon the method of data collection, which underlines the benefits of using multiple data sources to examine the relationship between ownership and the quality of care.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftSocial Science & Medicine
Vol/bind216
Sider (fra-til)41-49
ISSN0277-9536
DOI
StatusUdgivet - sep. 2018

Citer dette

Hjelmar, Ulf ; Bhatti, Yosef ; Petersen, Ole Helby ; Rostgaard, Tine ; Vrangbæk, Karsten. / Public/private ownership and quality of care : Evidence from Danish nursing homes. I: Social Science & Medicine. 2018 ; Bind 216. s. 41-49.
@article{d3dd21ad3484494287f1f81afceb4842,
title = "Public/private ownership and quality of care: Evidence from Danish nursing homes",
abstract = "The involvement of private for-profit (FP) and not-for-profit (NFP) providers in the otherwise public delivery of welfare services is gradually changing the Nordic welfare state towards a more market-oriented mode of service delivery. This article examines the relationship between ownership and quality of care in public and private FP and NFP nursing homes in Denmark. The analysis draws on original survey data and administrative registry data (quality inspection reports) for the full population of almost 1000 nursing homes in Denmark. Quality is measured in terms of structural quality, process quality and outcome quality. We find that public nursing homes have a higher structural quality (in terms of, for instance, staffing), while FP providers perform better in terms of process quality (e.g. in the form of individualised care). NFP providers perform well in terms of structural criteria such as employment of full-time staff and receive fewer critical comments in the inspection reports. However, the results depend to some extent upon the method of data collection, which underlines the benefits of using multiple data sources to examine the relationship between ownership and the quality of care.",
author = "Ulf Hjelmar and Yosef Bhatti and Petersen, {Ole Helby} and Tine Rostgaard and Karsten Vrangb{\ae}k",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.029",
language = "English",
volume = "216",
pages = "41--49",
journal = "Social Science & Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

Public/private ownership and quality of care : Evidence from Danish nursing homes. / Hjelmar, Ulf; Bhatti, Yosef; Petersen, Ole Helby; Rostgaard, Tine; Vrangbæk, Karsten.

I: Social Science & Medicine, Bind 216, 09.2018, s. 41-49.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public/private ownership and quality of care

T2 - Evidence from Danish nursing homes

AU - Hjelmar, Ulf

AU - Bhatti, Yosef

AU - Petersen, Ole Helby

AU - Rostgaard, Tine

AU - Vrangbæk, Karsten

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - The involvement of private for-profit (FP) and not-for-profit (NFP) providers in the otherwise public delivery of welfare services is gradually changing the Nordic welfare state towards a more market-oriented mode of service delivery. This article examines the relationship between ownership and quality of care in public and private FP and NFP nursing homes in Denmark. The analysis draws on original survey data and administrative registry data (quality inspection reports) for the full population of almost 1000 nursing homes in Denmark. Quality is measured in terms of structural quality, process quality and outcome quality. We find that public nursing homes have a higher structural quality (in terms of, for instance, staffing), while FP providers perform better in terms of process quality (e.g. in the form of individualised care). NFP providers perform well in terms of structural criteria such as employment of full-time staff and receive fewer critical comments in the inspection reports. However, the results depend to some extent upon the method of data collection, which underlines the benefits of using multiple data sources to examine the relationship between ownership and the quality of care.

AB - The involvement of private for-profit (FP) and not-for-profit (NFP) providers in the otherwise public delivery of welfare services is gradually changing the Nordic welfare state towards a more market-oriented mode of service delivery. This article examines the relationship between ownership and quality of care in public and private FP and NFP nursing homes in Denmark. The analysis draws on original survey data and administrative registry data (quality inspection reports) for the full population of almost 1000 nursing homes in Denmark. Quality is measured in terms of structural quality, process quality and outcome quality. We find that public nursing homes have a higher structural quality (in terms of, for instance, staffing), while FP providers perform better in terms of process quality (e.g. in the form of individualised care). NFP providers perform well in terms of structural criteria such as employment of full-time staff and receive fewer critical comments in the inspection reports. However, the results depend to some extent upon the method of data collection, which underlines the benefits of using multiple data sources to examine the relationship between ownership and the quality of care.

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.029

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.029

M3 - Journal article

VL - 216

SP - 41

EP - 49

JO - Social Science & Medicine

JF - Social Science & Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -