Projecting the Future for Design Science Research

An Action-Case Based Analysis

Richard Baskerville, Jan Pries-Heje

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportKonferencebidrag i proceedingsForskningpeer review

Resumé

Design science research should be relevant, valuable, purposeful and prescriptive. Its value as a relevant source of prescriptions implies the practical usefulness of its results beyond a single expository instantiation. But propagation of such design science products as design principles and theories appears to be a key challenge. In this paper we commence with a DESRIST paper from 2012 that instantiated design principles in an artifact for a bank. That paper included plans and techniques for future use of its principles (propagation), including prescriptions for a five-phase adoption process. In this paper we discuss the propagation issues around generalizing design science research across multiple contexts and propose alternative propagation concepts of projectability and entrenchment. The existing concepts around generalizability have issues that make them less suitable for design science research: context (local/possible worlds) and theoretical statements based on functional explanations. A projection is any relevant instance that supports a theory. Projectability involves defining the relationship between a base case or evidence and a projection. Entrenchment occurs when design principles or theories have stimulated many actual projections. We demonstrate these concepts in a case study of propagation: a chemical manufacturer and service provider that adopted the design principles arising from that 2012 DESRIST banking-based design science research. We conclude that generalizability is too well-oriented to descriptive research and argue that a more appropriate framing for design science research is projectability and entrenchment. The paper includes recommendations to increase the projectability of design science research.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelNew Horizons in Design Science : Broadening the Research Agenda
RedaktørerBrian Donnellan, Markus Helfert, Jim Kenneally, Debra VanderMeer, Marcus Rothenberger, Robert Winter
Vol/bind9073
ForlagSpringer
Publikationsdato2015
Sider280-291
ISBN (Trykt)978-3-319-18713-6
ISBN (Elektronisk)978-3-319-18714-3
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2015
Begivenhed10th International Conference - Clontarf Castle, Dublin, Irland
Varighed: 20 maj 201522 maj 2015
http://desrist2015.computing.dcu.ie/

Konference

Konference10th International Conference
LokationClontarf Castle
LandIrland
ByDublin
Periode20/05/201522/05/2015
Internetadresse
NavnLecture Notes in Computer Science
Vol/bind9073
ISSN0302-9743

Citer dette

Baskerville, R., & Pries-Heje, J. (2015). Projecting the Future for Design Science Research: An Action-Case Based Analysis. I B. Donnellan, M. Helfert, J. Kenneally, D. VanderMeer, M. Rothenberger, & R. Winter (red.), New Horizons in Design Science: Broadening the Research Agenda (Bind 9073, s. 280-291). Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Bind. 9073 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18714-3_18
Baskerville, Richard ; Pries-Heje, Jan. / Projecting the Future for Design Science Research : An Action-Case Based Analysis. New Horizons in Design Science: Broadening the Research Agenda. red. / Brian Donnellan ; Markus Helfert ; Jim Kenneally ; Debra VanderMeer ; Marcus Rothenberger ; Robert Winter. Bind 9073 Springer, 2015. s. 280-291 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Bind 9073).
@inproceedings{e4b6b44e5eaa4fdab1980addd479647a,
title = "Projecting the Future for Design Science Research: An Action-Case Based Analysis",
abstract = "Design science research should be relevant, valuable, purposeful and prescriptive. Its value as a relevant source of prescriptions implies the practical usefulness of its results beyond a single expository instantiation. But propagation of such design science products as design principles and theories appears to be a key challenge. In this paper we commence with a DESRIST paper from 2012 that instantiated design principles in an artifact for a bank. That paper included plans and techniques for future use of its principles (propagation), including prescriptions for a five-phase adoption process. In this paper we discuss the propagation issues around generalizing design science research across multiple contexts and propose alternative propagation concepts of projectability and entrenchment. The existing concepts around generalizability have issues that make them less suitable for design science research: context (local/possible worlds) and theoretical statements based on functional explanations. A projection is any relevant instance that supports a theory. Projectability involves defining the relationship between a base case or evidence and a projection. Entrenchment occurs when design principles or theories have stimulated many actual projections. We demonstrate these concepts in a case study of propagation: a chemical manufacturer and service provider that adopted the design principles arising from that 2012 DESRIST banking-based design science research. We conclude that generalizability is too well-oriented to descriptive research and argue that a more appropriate framing for design science research is projectability and entrenchment. The paper includes recommendations to increase the projectability of design science research.",
author = "Richard Baskerville and Jan Pries-Heje",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-18714-3_18",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-18713-6",
volume = "9073",
pages = "280--291",
editor = "Brian Donnellan and Markus Helfert and { Kenneally}, Jim and Debra VanderMeer and Marcus Rothenberger and Robert Winter",
booktitle = "New Horizons in Design Science",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Baskerville, R & Pries-Heje, J 2015, Projecting the Future for Design Science Research: An Action-Case Based Analysis. i B Donnellan, M Helfert, J Kenneally, D VanderMeer, M Rothenberger & R Winter (red), New Horizons in Design Science: Broadening the Research Agenda. bind 9073, Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, bind 9073, s. 280-291, 10th International Conference, Dublin, Irland, 20/05/2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18714-3_18

Projecting the Future for Design Science Research : An Action-Case Based Analysis. / Baskerville, Richard; Pries-Heje, Jan.

New Horizons in Design Science: Broadening the Research Agenda. red. / Brian Donnellan; Markus Helfert; Jim Kenneally; Debra VanderMeer; Marcus Rothenberger; Robert Winter. Bind 9073 Springer, 2015. s. 280-291 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Bind 9073).

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportKonferencebidrag i proceedingsForskningpeer review

TY - GEN

T1 - Projecting the Future for Design Science Research

T2 - An Action-Case Based Analysis

AU - Baskerville, Richard

AU - Pries-Heje, Jan

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Design science research should be relevant, valuable, purposeful and prescriptive. Its value as a relevant source of prescriptions implies the practical usefulness of its results beyond a single expository instantiation. But propagation of such design science products as design principles and theories appears to be a key challenge. In this paper we commence with a DESRIST paper from 2012 that instantiated design principles in an artifact for a bank. That paper included plans and techniques for future use of its principles (propagation), including prescriptions for a five-phase adoption process. In this paper we discuss the propagation issues around generalizing design science research across multiple contexts and propose alternative propagation concepts of projectability and entrenchment. The existing concepts around generalizability have issues that make them less suitable for design science research: context (local/possible worlds) and theoretical statements based on functional explanations. A projection is any relevant instance that supports a theory. Projectability involves defining the relationship between a base case or evidence and a projection. Entrenchment occurs when design principles or theories have stimulated many actual projections. We demonstrate these concepts in a case study of propagation: a chemical manufacturer and service provider that adopted the design principles arising from that 2012 DESRIST banking-based design science research. We conclude that generalizability is too well-oriented to descriptive research and argue that a more appropriate framing for design science research is projectability and entrenchment. The paper includes recommendations to increase the projectability of design science research.

AB - Design science research should be relevant, valuable, purposeful and prescriptive. Its value as a relevant source of prescriptions implies the practical usefulness of its results beyond a single expository instantiation. But propagation of such design science products as design principles and theories appears to be a key challenge. In this paper we commence with a DESRIST paper from 2012 that instantiated design principles in an artifact for a bank. That paper included plans and techniques for future use of its principles (propagation), including prescriptions for a five-phase adoption process. In this paper we discuss the propagation issues around generalizing design science research across multiple contexts and propose alternative propagation concepts of projectability and entrenchment. The existing concepts around generalizability have issues that make them less suitable for design science research: context (local/possible worlds) and theoretical statements based on functional explanations. A projection is any relevant instance that supports a theory. Projectability involves defining the relationship between a base case or evidence and a projection. Entrenchment occurs when design principles or theories have stimulated many actual projections. We demonstrate these concepts in a case study of propagation: a chemical manufacturer and service provider that adopted the design principles arising from that 2012 DESRIST banking-based design science research. We conclude that generalizability is too well-oriented to descriptive research and argue that a more appropriate framing for design science research is projectability and entrenchment. The paper includes recommendations to increase the projectability of design science research.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-18714-3_18

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-18714-3_18

M3 - Article in proceedings

SN - 978-3-319-18713-6

VL - 9073

SP - 280

EP - 291

BT - New Horizons in Design Science

A2 - Donnellan, Brian

A2 - Helfert, Markus

A2 - Kenneally, Jim

A2 - VanderMeer, Debra

A2 - Rothenberger, Marcus

A2 - Winter, Robert

PB - Springer

ER -

Baskerville R, Pries-Heje J. Projecting the Future for Design Science Research: An Action-Case Based Analysis. I Donnellan B, Helfert M, Kenneally J, VanderMeer D, Rothenberger M, Winter R, red., New Horizons in Design Science: Broadening the Research Agenda. Bind 9073. Springer. 2015. s. 280-291. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Bind 9073). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18714-3_18