Please Like, Comment and Share our Campaign!

How Social Media Managers for Danish Political Parties Perceive User-Generated Content

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Based on 18 qualitative interviews, this article explores how the social media managers for the nine parties in the Danish parliament articulate the role of social media during the 2015 national elections. The article finds that the interviewees emphasise Facebook as an important means for one-way political communication and the monitoring of public opinion. The majority of the interviewees articulate a sense of responsibility for facilitating public debate on Facebook through the moderation of user-generated content and/or interactions with users. Yet the social media managers do not systematically analyse political input from social media users, nor do they see Facebook and Twitter as viable means of citizen influence on political decision-making. This is explained by a perceived lack of voter representativeness among Facebook users, fear of appearing politically imprudent and scepticism towards social media’s participatory potential.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftN O R D I C O M Review
Vol/bind39
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)19-33
ISSN1403-1108
DOI
StatusUdgivet - mar. 2018

Citer dette

@article{93dd41614cdf43e7a96fd4174b58ab83,
title = "Please Like, Comment and Share our Campaign!: How Social Media Managers for Danish Political Parties Perceive User-Generated Content",
abstract = "Based on 18 qualitative interviews, this article explores how the social media managers for the nine parties in the Danish parliament articulate the role of social media during the 2015 national elections. The article finds that the interviewees emphasise Facebook as an important means for one-way political communication and the monitoring of public opinion. The majority of the interviewees articulate a sense of responsibility for facilitating public debate on Facebook through the moderation of user-generated content and/or interactions with users. Yet the social media managers do not systematically analyse political input from social media users, nor do they see Facebook and Twitter as viable means of citizen influence on political decision-making. This is explained by a perceived lack of voter representativeness among Facebook users, fear of appearing politically imprudent and scepticism towards social media’s participatory potential.",
author = "Johan Farkas and Schwartz, {Sander Andreas}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
doi = "10.2478/nor-2018-0008",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "19--33",
journal = "N O R D I C O M Review",
issn = "1403-1108",
publisher = "N O R D I C O M A/S",
number = "2",

}

Please Like, Comment and Share our Campaign! How Social Media Managers for Danish Political Parties Perceive User-Generated Content. / Farkas, Johan; Schwartz, Sander Andreas.

I: N O R D I C O M Review, Bind 39, Nr. 2, 03.2018, s. 19-33.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Please Like, Comment and Share our Campaign!

T2 - How Social Media Managers for Danish Political Parties Perceive User-Generated Content

AU - Farkas, Johan

AU - Schwartz, Sander Andreas

PY - 2018/3

Y1 - 2018/3

N2 - Based on 18 qualitative interviews, this article explores how the social media managers for the nine parties in the Danish parliament articulate the role of social media during the 2015 national elections. The article finds that the interviewees emphasise Facebook as an important means for one-way political communication and the monitoring of public opinion. The majority of the interviewees articulate a sense of responsibility for facilitating public debate on Facebook through the moderation of user-generated content and/or interactions with users. Yet the social media managers do not systematically analyse political input from social media users, nor do they see Facebook and Twitter as viable means of citizen influence on political decision-making. This is explained by a perceived lack of voter representativeness among Facebook users, fear of appearing politically imprudent and scepticism towards social media’s participatory potential.

AB - Based on 18 qualitative interviews, this article explores how the social media managers for the nine parties in the Danish parliament articulate the role of social media during the 2015 national elections. The article finds that the interviewees emphasise Facebook as an important means for one-way political communication and the monitoring of public opinion. The majority of the interviewees articulate a sense of responsibility for facilitating public debate on Facebook through the moderation of user-generated content and/or interactions with users. Yet the social media managers do not systematically analyse political input from social media users, nor do they see Facebook and Twitter as viable means of citizen influence on political decision-making. This is explained by a perceived lack of voter representativeness among Facebook users, fear of appearing politically imprudent and scepticism towards social media’s participatory potential.

U2 - 10.2478/nor-2018-0008

DO - 10.2478/nor-2018-0008

M3 - Journal article

VL - 39

SP - 19

EP - 33

JO - N O R D I C O M Review

JF - N O R D I C O M Review

SN - 1403-1108

IS - 2

ER -