Pinning Down Democracy: A Q-Method Study of Lived Democracy

Rune Holmgaard Andersen, Jennie L Schulze, Külliki Seppel

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    The social sciences disagree on how democracy should be defined and measured. This study approaches the conceptualization of democracy from the demos side. Using Q-methodology, we pin down the way ordinary Estonians live and understand democracy. The analysis reveals three distinct discourses: a libertarian democracy as freedom; a participatory democracy as empowerment; and a populist democracy as the utopia of good policies. It also points to strong consensus on what it means to live together in society. The study has both general and specific value. It tests the correspondence between defined democracy and lived democracy; it demonstrates how Q-methodology can objectivize the subjective; and it provides new empirical knowledge about how ordinary people perceive democracy. Understanding how people conceive of democracy is essential for ensuring measurement validity when using either conventional quantitative or qualitative approaches
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftPolity
    Vol/bind50
    Udgave nummer1
    ISSN0032-3497
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 2018

    Emneord

    • democracy
    • conceptualization
    • Q-methodology
    • discourse
    • contested concepts
    • Estonia

    Citer dette

    Andersen, R. H., Schulze, J. L., & Seppel, K. (2018). Pinning Down Democracy: A Q-Method Study of Lived Democracy. Polity, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.1086/695417
    Andersen, Rune Holmgaard ; Schulze, Jennie L ; Seppel, Külliki. / Pinning Down Democracy : A Q-Method Study of Lived Democracy. I: Polity. 2018 ; Bind 50, Nr. 1.
    @article{e060d8a3b12a430287adde2ac1bfad1c,
    title = "Pinning Down Democracy: A Q-Method Study of Lived Democracy",
    abstract = "The social sciences disagree on how democracy should be defined and measured. This study approaches the conceptualization of democracy from the demos side. Using Q-methodology, we pin down the way ordinary Estonians live and understand democracy. The analysis reveals three distinct discourses: a libertarian democracy as freedom; a participatory democracy as empowerment; and a populist democracy as the utopia of good policies. It also points to strong consensus on what it means to live together in society. The study has both general and specific value. It tests the correspondence between defined democracy and lived democracy; it demonstrates how Q-methodology can objectivize the subjective; and it provides new empirical knowledge about how ordinary people perceive democracy. Understanding how people conceive of democracy is essential for ensuring measurement validity when using either conventional quantitative or qualitative approaches",
    keywords = "democracy, conceptualization, Q-methodology, discourse, contested concepts, Estonia",
    author = "Andersen, {Rune Holmgaard} and Schulze, {Jennie L} and K{\"u}lliki Seppel",
    year = "2018",
    doi = "10.1086/695417",
    language = "English",
    volume = "50",
    journal = "Polity",
    issn = "0032-3497",
    publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
    number = "1",

    }

    Andersen, RH, Schulze, JL & Seppel, K 2018, 'Pinning Down Democracy: A Q-Method Study of Lived Democracy' Polity, bind 50, nr. 1. https://doi.org/10.1086/695417

    Pinning Down Democracy : A Q-Method Study of Lived Democracy. / Andersen, Rune Holmgaard; Schulze, Jennie L; Seppel, Külliki.

    I: Polity, Bind 50, Nr. 1, 2018.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Pinning Down Democracy

    T2 - A Q-Method Study of Lived Democracy

    AU - Andersen, Rune Holmgaard

    AU - Schulze, Jennie L

    AU - Seppel, Külliki

    PY - 2018

    Y1 - 2018

    N2 - The social sciences disagree on how democracy should be defined and measured. This study approaches the conceptualization of democracy from the demos side. Using Q-methodology, we pin down the way ordinary Estonians live and understand democracy. The analysis reveals three distinct discourses: a libertarian democracy as freedom; a participatory democracy as empowerment; and a populist democracy as the utopia of good policies. It also points to strong consensus on what it means to live together in society. The study has both general and specific value. It tests the correspondence between defined democracy and lived democracy; it demonstrates how Q-methodology can objectivize the subjective; and it provides new empirical knowledge about how ordinary people perceive democracy. Understanding how people conceive of democracy is essential for ensuring measurement validity when using either conventional quantitative or qualitative approaches

    AB - The social sciences disagree on how democracy should be defined and measured. This study approaches the conceptualization of democracy from the demos side. Using Q-methodology, we pin down the way ordinary Estonians live and understand democracy. The analysis reveals three distinct discourses: a libertarian democracy as freedom; a participatory democracy as empowerment; and a populist democracy as the utopia of good policies. It also points to strong consensus on what it means to live together in society. The study has both general and specific value. It tests the correspondence between defined democracy and lived democracy; it demonstrates how Q-methodology can objectivize the subjective; and it provides new empirical knowledge about how ordinary people perceive democracy. Understanding how people conceive of democracy is essential for ensuring measurement validity when using either conventional quantitative or qualitative approaches

    KW - democracy

    KW - conceptualization

    KW - Q-methodology

    KW - discourse

    KW - contested concepts

    KW - Estonia

    U2 - 10.1086/695417

    DO - 10.1086/695417

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 50

    JO - Polity

    JF - Polity

    SN - 0032-3497

    IS - 1

    ER -