Pinning Down Democracy: A Q-Method Study of Lived Democracy

Rune Holmgaard Andersen, Jennie L Schulze, Külliki Seppel

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    Abstract

    The social sciences disagree on how democracy should be defined and measured. This study approaches the conceptualization of democracy from the demos side. Using Q-methodology, we pin down the way ordinary Estonians live and understand democracy. The analysis reveals three distinct discourses: a libertarian democracy as freedom; a participatory democracy as empowerment; and a populist democracy as the utopia of good policies. It also points to strong consensus on what it means to live together in society. The study has both general and specific value. It tests the correspondence between defined democracy and lived democracy; it demonstrates how Q-methodology can objectivize the subjective; and it provides new empirical knowledge about how ordinary people perceive democracy. Understanding how people conceive of democracy is essential for ensuring measurement validity when using either conventional quantitative or qualitative approaches
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftPolity
    Vol/bind50
    Udgave nummer1
    ISSN0032-3497
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 2018

    Emneord

    • democracy
    • conceptualization
    • Q-methodology
    • discourse
    • contested concepts
    • Estonia

    Citer dette

    Andersen, R. H., Schulze, J. L., & Seppel, K. (2018). Pinning Down Democracy: A Q-Method Study of Lived Democracy. Polity, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.1086/695417