Personalised risk

New risk encounters facing migrant care workers

Karen Christensen, Jill Manthorpe

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Many long-term care systems are seeking to address problems of growing demand,
increasing expense, and higher user expectations. For many of them fostering care at
home and private care arrangements are attractive options. The long-term care sector in England is typical of these systems. Over the last 2 decades, government policy in
England has placed stronger emphasis on people’s choice and control when receiving
care services. People with care and support needs may be eligible for public funds to
employ care workers or to use them in other ways promote their well-being. These
financial transactions are a major part of the policy of personalisation in adult social
care, as confirmed by the Care Act 2014. Drawing on findings from life story interviews with 31 migrant care workers who had worked for disabled or older people in England, conducted 2011–2013, we note the potential for expanding the sociologically inspired concept ‘personalised risk’. This necessitates an appreciation of risks potentially faced by the multiple parties in the care relationship and a differentiated set of structural risks. Applying a multilevel analysis we highlight the potential risks of ‘informality’ of employment conditions experienced by directly employed care workers, the ‘emotional’ content of care worker-employer relationships, and ‘intimacy’ of employer/employee roles. In this article, we offer an empirical based contribution to the wider discussion of risks and risk theory derived from policy changes being adopted by many developed countries that increasingly emphasise individual responsibility for personal welfare within an uncertain and mobile social world.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftHealth, Risk & Society
Vol/bind18
Udgave nummer3-4
Sider (fra-til)137-152
ISSN1369-8575
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2016
Udgivet eksterntJa

Citer dette

@article{d0037cc986354ea9af793602ab1d74b8,
title = "Personalised risk: New risk encounters facing migrant care workers",
abstract = "Many long-term care systems are seeking to address problems of growing demand,increasing expense, and higher user expectations. For many of them fostering care athome and private care arrangements are attractive options. The long-term care sector in England is typical of these systems. Over the last 2 decades, government policy inEngland has placed stronger emphasis on people’s choice and control when receivingcare services. People with care and support needs may be eligible for public funds toemploy care workers or to use them in other ways promote their well-being. Thesefinancial transactions are a major part of the policy of personalisation in adult socialcare, as confirmed by the Care Act 2014. Drawing on findings from life story interviews with 31 migrant care workers who had worked for disabled or older people in England, conducted 2011–2013, we note the potential for expanding the sociologically inspired concept ‘personalised risk’. This necessitates an appreciation of risks potentially faced by the multiple parties in the care relationship and a differentiated set of structural risks. Applying a multilevel analysis we highlight the potential risks of ‘informality’ of employment conditions experienced by directly employed care workers, the ‘emotional’ content of care worker-employer relationships, and ‘intimacy’ of employer/employee roles. In this article, we offer an empirical based contribution to the wider discussion of risks and risk theory derived from policy changes being adopted by many developed countries that increasingly emphasise individual responsibility for personal welfare within an uncertain and mobile social world.",
author = "Karen Christensen and Jill Manthorpe",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/13698575.2016.1182628",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "137--152",
journal = "Health, Risk & Society",
issn = "1369-8575",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Online",
number = "3-4",

}

Personalised risk : New risk encounters facing migrant care workers. / Christensen, Karen; Manthorpe, Jill.

I: Health, Risk & Society, Bind 18, Nr. 3-4, 2016, s. 137-152.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Personalised risk

T2 - New risk encounters facing migrant care workers

AU - Christensen, Karen

AU - Manthorpe, Jill

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Many long-term care systems are seeking to address problems of growing demand,increasing expense, and higher user expectations. For many of them fostering care athome and private care arrangements are attractive options. The long-term care sector in England is typical of these systems. Over the last 2 decades, government policy inEngland has placed stronger emphasis on people’s choice and control when receivingcare services. People with care and support needs may be eligible for public funds toemploy care workers or to use them in other ways promote their well-being. Thesefinancial transactions are a major part of the policy of personalisation in adult socialcare, as confirmed by the Care Act 2014. Drawing on findings from life story interviews with 31 migrant care workers who had worked for disabled or older people in England, conducted 2011–2013, we note the potential for expanding the sociologically inspired concept ‘personalised risk’. This necessitates an appreciation of risks potentially faced by the multiple parties in the care relationship and a differentiated set of structural risks. Applying a multilevel analysis we highlight the potential risks of ‘informality’ of employment conditions experienced by directly employed care workers, the ‘emotional’ content of care worker-employer relationships, and ‘intimacy’ of employer/employee roles. In this article, we offer an empirical based contribution to the wider discussion of risks and risk theory derived from policy changes being adopted by many developed countries that increasingly emphasise individual responsibility for personal welfare within an uncertain and mobile social world.

AB - Many long-term care systems are seeking to address problems of growing demand,increasing expense, and higher user expectations. For many of them fostering care athome and private care arrangements are attractive options. The long-term care sector in England is typical of these systems. Over the last 2 decades, government policy inEngland has placed stronger emphasis on people’s choice and control when receivingcare services. People with care and support needs may be eligible for public funds toemploy care workers or to use them in other ways promote their well-being. Thesefinancial transactions are a major part of the policy of personalisation in adult socialcare, as confirmed by the Care Act 2014. Drawing on findings from life story interviews with 31 migrant care workers who had worked for disabled or older people in England, conducted 2011–2013, we note the potential for expanding the sociologically inspired concept ‘personalised risk’. This necessitates an appreciation of risks potentially faced by the multiple parties in the care relationship and a differentiated set of structural risks. Applying a multilevel analysis we highlight the potential risks of ‘informality’ of employment conditions experienced by directly employed care workers, the ‘emotional’ content of care worker-employer relationships, and ‘intimacy’ of employer/employee roles. In this article, we offer an empirical based contribution to the wider discussion of risks and risk theory derived from policy changes being adopted by many developed countries that increasingly emphasise individual responsibility for personal welfare within an uncertain and mobile social world.

U2 - 10.1080/13698575.2016.1182628

DO - 10.1080/13698575.2016.1182628

M3 - Journal article

VL - 18

SP - 137

EP - 152

JO - Health, Risk & Society

JF - Health, Risk & Society

SN - 1369-8575

IS - 3-4

ER -