Partnerships for wildlife protection and their sustainability outcomes

A literature review

Christine Noe, Adriana Budeanu, Emmanuel Sulle, Mette Fog Olwig, Dan Brockington, Ruth John

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Resumé

The rhetoric of a ‘win-win-win’ situation – which represents simultaneous achievement of economic growth, environmental protection and social development – is central to the emergence of community-based wildlife protection efforts that involve new partnerships between actors such as local communities, businesses and government agencies. The win-win rhetoric furthers the logic that the more partners, the more wins – yet the current knowledge base lacks clear criteria for evaluating partnerships. This working paper uses political ecology as a conceptual lens to propose such criteria. We suggest examining partnerships not only based on their complexity, but also how they are formed and gain legitimacy in different contexts and how various partnership configurations engender particular kinds of ecological and socio-economic outcomes. Based on a review of the literature about partnerships and their impacts, and drawing on insights from Tanzania’s wildlife sector, we establish three groups of literature that emphasize the benefits of partnerships: one focusing on landscape conservation, another on governance reforms and the last on tourism related businesses. In these three groups of literature, partnerships are claimed to improve the effectiveness of biodiversity governance by securing land, facilitating local developments and by creating business links. Building on critiques from political ecology we conclude by questioning this win-win-win rhetoric arguing that partnerships only lead to wins for specific actors thereby indirectly aggravating local power struggles. They do so by supporting rent seeking and the rise of local elites while simultaneously concealing the marginalization of other actors and thereby effectively contributing to the continued loss of local land rights.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Udgivelses stedKøbenhavn
UdgiverNepsus Working Paper
Vol/bind2017/2
Sider34
ISBN (Elektronisk)978-87-93571-00-6
StatusUdgivet - 2017
NavnNEPSUS Working Paper Series
Nummer2
Vol/bind2017

Bibliografisk note

The project is funded by the Consultative Committee for Development Research, Royal Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Grant 01-15-CBS)

Emneord

  • Partnerships
  • Wildlife
  • Community-based conservation and sustainability

Citer dette

Noe, C., Budeanu, A., Sulle, E., Olwig, M. F., Brockington, D., & John, R. (2017). Partnerships for wildlife protection and their sustainability outcomes: A literature review. (s. 34). København: Nepsus Working Paper. NEPSUS Working Paper Series, Nr. 2, Bind. 2017
Noe, Christine ; Budeanu, Adriana ; Sulle, Emmanuel ; Olwig, Mette Fog ; Brockington, Dan ; John, Ruth. / Partnerships for wildlife protection and their sustainability outcomes : A literature review. København : Nepsus Working Paper, 2017. s. 34 (NEPSUS Working Paper Series; Nr. 2, Bind 2017).
@techreport{fd9fcc752e5a497bb48f97ad4fcc4d89,
title = "Partnerships for wildlife protection and their sustainability outcomes: A literature review",
abstract = "The rhetoric of a ‘win-win-win’ situation – which represents simultaneous achievement of economic growth, environmental protection and social development – is central to the emergence of community-based wildlife protection efforts that involve new partnerships between actors such as local communities, businesses and government agencies. The win-win rhetoric furthers the logic that the more partners, the more wins – yet the current knowledge base lacks clear criteria for evaluating partnerships. This working paper uses political ecology as a conceptual lens to propose such criteria. We suggest examining partnerships not only based on their complexity, but also how they are formed and gain legitimacy in different contexts and how various partnership configurations engender particular kinds of ecological and socio-economic outcomes. Based on a review of the literature about partnerships and their impacts, and drawing on insights from Tanzania’s wildlife sector, we establish three groups of literature that emphasize the benefits of partnerships: one focusing on landscape conservation, another on governance reforms and the last on tourism related businesses. In these three groups of literature, partnerships are claimed to improve the effectiveness of biodiversity governance by securing land, facilitating local developments and by creating business links. Building on critiques from political ecology we conclude by questioning this win-win-win rhetoric arguing that partnerships only lead to wins for specific actors thereby indirectly aggravating local power struggles. They do so by supporting rent seeking and the rise of local elites while simultaneously concealing the marginalization of other actors and thereby effectively contributing to the continued loss of local land rights.",
keywords = "Partnerships, Wildlife, Community-based conservation and sustainability, Partnerships, Wildlife, Community-based conservation and sustainability",
author = "Christine Noe and Adriana Budeanu and Emmanuel Sulle and Olwig, {Mette Fog} and Dan Brockington and Ruth John",
note = "The project is funded by the Consultative Committee for Development Research, Royal Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Grant 01-15-CBS)",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "2017/2",
pages = "34",
publisher = "Nepsus Working Paper",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Nepsus Working Paper",

}

Noe, C, Budeanu, A, Sulle, E, Olwig, MF, Brockington, D & John, R 2017 'Partnerships for wildlife protection and their sustainability outcomes: A literature review' Nepsus Working Paper, København, s. 34.

Partnerships for wildlife protection and their sustainability outcomes : A literature review. / Noe, Christine; Budeanu, Adriana; Sulle, Emmanuel; Olwig, Mette Fog; Brockington, Dan; John, Ruth.

København : Nepsus Working Paper, 2017. s. 34.

Publikation: Working paperForskning

TY - UNPB

T1 - Partnerships for wildlife protection and their sustainability outcomes

T2 - A literature review

AU - Noe, Christine

AU - Budeanu, Adriana

AU - Sulle, Emmanuel

AU - Olwig, Mette Fog

AU - Brockington, Dan

AU - John, Ruth

N1 - The project is funded by the Consultative Committee for Development Research, Royal Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Grant 01-15-CBS)

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The rhetoric of a ‘win-win-win’ situation – which represents simultaneous achievement of economic growth, environmental protection and social development – is central to the emergence of community-based wildlife protection efforts that involve new partnerships between actors such as local communities, businesses and government agencies. The win-win rhetoric furthers the logic that the more partners, the more wins – yet the current knowledge base lacks clear criteria for evaluating partnerships. This working paper uses political ecology as a conceptual lens to propose such criteria. We suggest examining partnerships not only based on their complexity, but also how they are formed and gain legitimacy in different contexts and how various partnership configurations engender particular kinds of ecological and socio-economic outcomes. Based on a review of the literature about partnerships and their impacts, and drawing on insights from Tanzania’s wildlife sector, we establish three groups of literature that emphasize the benefits of partnerships: one focusing on landscape conservation, another on governance reforms and the last on tourism related businesses. In these three groups of literature, partnerships are claimed to improve the effectiveness of biodiversity governance by securing land, facilitating local developments and by creating business links. Building on critiques from political ecology we conclude by questioning this win-win-win rhetoric arguing that partnerships only lead to wins for specific actors thereby indirectly aggravating local power struggles. They do so by supporting rent seeking and the rise of local elites while simultaneously concealing the marginalization of other actors and thereby effectively contributing to the continued loss of local land rights.

AB - The rhetoric of a ‘win-win-win’ situation – which represents simultaneous achievement of economic growth, environmental protection and social development – is central to the emergence of community-based wildlife protection efforts that involve new partnerships between actors such as local communities, businesses and government agencies. The win-win rhetoric furthers the logic that the more partners, the more wins – yet the current knowledge base lacks clear criteria for evaluating partnerships. This working paper uses political ecology as a conceptual lens to propose such criteria. We suggest examining partnerships not only based on their complexity, but also how they are formed and gain legitimacy in different contexts and how various partnership configurations engender particular kinds of ecological and socio-economic outcomes. Based on a review of the literature about partnerships and their impacts, and drawing on insights from Tanzania’s wildlife sector, we establish three groups of literature that emphasize the benefits of partnerships: one focusing on landscape conservation, another on governance reforms and the last on tourism related businesses. In these three groups of literature, partnerships are claimed to improve the effectiveness of biodiversity governance by securing land, facilitating local developments and by creating business links. Building on critiques from political ecology we conclude by questioning this win-win-win rhetoric arguing that partnerships only lead to wins for specific actors thereby indirectly aggravating local power struggles. They do so by supporting rent seeking and the rise of local elites while simultaneously concealing the marginalization of other actors and thereby effectively contributing to the continued loss of local land rights.

KW - Partnerships

KW - Wildlife

KW - Community-based conservation and sustainability

KW - Partnerships

KW - Wildlife

KW - Community-based conservation and sustainability

M3 - Working paper

VL - 2017/2

SP - 34

BT - Partnerships for wildlife protection and their sustainability outcomes

PB - Nepsus Working Paper

CY - København

ER -

Noe C, Budeanu A, Sulle E, Olwig MF, Brockington D, John R. Partnerships for wildlife protection and their sustainability outcomes: A literature review. København: Nepsus Working Paper. 2017, s. 34.