Partnerships as Interpellation

Sigrid Bjerre Andersen, Steffen Jensen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This article explores the consequences of labelling international development relations as partnerships, as has gained prominence over the past decades. It contributes to a growing literature on the ethnography of development by suggesting that ‘partner’ identity is destabilized and renegotiable rather than stable and predictable. By exploring how partnership works within a system of discursive interpellation we illustrate that donors and recipients are given a new set of possibilities and constraints in the practice of shaping their relation. We exemplify this through ethnographic analyses of the political partnership between Liberia and the European Union, and the partnership between a South African and a Danish NGO. Both illustrate how neither donor nor recipient, as it is otherwise often assumed, can univocally announce a partnership. Rather, representatives of the institutions involved mutually interpellate and constantly negotiate partner identities.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEuropean Journal of Development Research
Vol/bind29
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)93-107
ISSN0957-8811
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2017

Emneord

  • Partnership
  • Interpellation
  • Donor-recipient relations
  • European Union
  • Liberia
  • South Africa

Citer dette

Andersen, Sigrid Bjerre ; Jensen, Steffen. / Partnerships as Interpellation. I: European Journal of Development Research. 2017 ; Bind 29, Nr. 1. s. 93-107.
@article{e89ca70e4b614ddba9f9bdf6953269ee,
title = "Partnerships as Interpellation",
abstract = "This article explores the consequences of labelling international development relations as partnerships, as has gained prominence over the past decades. It contributes to a growing literature on the ethnography of development by suggesting that ‘partner’ identity is destabilized and renegotiable rather than stable and predictable. By exploring how partnership works within a system of discursive interpellation we illustrate that donors and recipients are given a new set of possibilities and constraints in the practice of shaping their relation. We exemplify this through ethnographic analyses of the political partnership between Liberia and the European Union, and the partnership between a South African and a Danish NGO. Both illustrate how neither donor nor recipient, as it is otherwise often assumed, can univocally announce a partnership. Rather, representatives of the institutions involved mutually interpellate and constantly negotiate partner identities.",
keywords = "Partnership, Interpellation, Donor-recipient relations, European Union, Liberia, South Africa, Partnership, Interpellation, donor-recipient relations, European Union , Liberia, South Africa",
author = "Andersen, {Sigrid Bjerre} and Steffen Jensen",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1057/ejdr.2015.80",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "93--107",
journal = "European Journal of Development Research",
issn = "0957-8811",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Partnerships as Interpellation. / Andersen, Sigrid Bjerre; Jensen, Steffen.

I: European Journal of Development Research, Bind 29, Nr. 1, 2017, s. 93-107.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Partnerships as Interpellation

AU - Andersen, Sigrid Bjerre

AU - Jensen, Steffen

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This article explores the consequences of labelling international development relations as partnerships, as has gained prominence over the past decades. It contributes to a growing literature on the ethnography of development by suggesting that ‘partner’ identity is destabilized and renegotiable rather than stable and predictable. By exploring how partnership works within a system of discursive interpellation we illustrate that donors and recipients are given a new set of possibilities and constraints in the practice of shaping their relation. We exemplify this through ethnographic analyses of the political partnership between Liberia and the European Union, and the partnership between a South African and a Danish NGO. Both illustrate how neither donor nor recipient, as it is otherwise often assumed, can univocally announce a partnership. Rather, representatives of the institutions involved mutually interpellate and constantly negotiate partner identities.

AB - This article explores the consequences of labelling international development relations as partnerships, as has gained prominence over the past decades. It contributes to a growing literature on the ethnography of development by suggesting that ‘partner’ identity is destabilized and renegotiable rather than stable and predictable. By exploring how partnership works within a system of discursive interpellation we illustrate that donors and recipients are given a new set of possibilities and constraints in the practice of shaping their relation. We exemplify this through ethnographic analyses of the political partnership between Liberia and the European Union, and the partnership between a South African and a Danish NGO. Both illustrate how neither donor nor recipient, as it is otherwise often assumed, can univocally announce a partnership. Rather, representatives of the institutions involved mutually interpellate and constantly negotiate partner identities.

KW - Partnership

KW - Interpellation

KW - Donor-recipient relations

KW - European Union

KW - Liberia

KW - South Africa

KW - Partnership

KW - Interpellation

KW - donor-recipient relations

KW - European Union

KW - Liberia

KW - South Africa

U2 - 10.1057/ejdr.2015.80

DO - 10.1057/ejdr.2015.80

M3 - Journal article

VL - 29

SP - 93

EP - 107

JO - European Journal of Development Research

JF - European Journal of Development Research

SN - 0957-8811

IS - 1

ER -