On the usefulness of soft OR models in decision making: A comparison of Problem Structuring Methods supported and self-organized workshops

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Applications of Problem Structuring Methods (PSMs) are extensively reported in the literature; however, their evaluation remains challenging. Moreover, scholars’ disagreement on how to evaluate and compare PSMs constrains research that seeks to show whether certain PSMs are more useful than others within particular contexts and ‘better than doing nothing’. Drawing on scholars’ suggestion to evaluate PSMs through a link between action, outcomes and context, we address this gap by adopting an exploratory, quasi-experimental research design with MSc students to evaluate and compare three workshops supported by the use of (i) Strategic Choice Approach, (ii) Soft Systems Methodology and (iii) a non-PSM supported approach, and report on the findings of a quantitative and qualitative analysis. We explore the usefulness of PSMs for achieving outcomes that can support decision making. Our findings show variation in the usefulness of the three approaches and the different workshop outcomes.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEuropean Journal of Operational Research
Vol/bind275
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)1020-1036
Antal sider17
ISSN0377-2217
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jun. 2019
Udgivet eksterntJa

Citer dette

@article{5f8ff5246d0642a8a87ea628fdf0946a,
title = "On the usefulness of soft OR models in decision making: A comparison of Problem Structuring Methods supported and self-organized workshops",
abstract = "Applications of Problem Structuring Methods (PSMs) are extensively reported in the literature; however, their evaluation remains challenging. Moreover, scholars’ disagreement on how to evaluate and compare PSMs constrains research that seeks to show whether certain PSMs are more useful than others within particular contexts and ‘better than doing nothing’. Drawing on scholars’ suggestion to evaluate PSMs through a link between action, outcomes and context, we address this gap by adopting an exploratory, quasi-experimental research design with MSc students to evaluate and compare three workshops supported by the use of (i) Strategic Choice Approach, (ii) Soft Systems Methodology and (iii) a non-PSM supported approach, and report on the findings of a quantitative and qualitative analysis. We explore the usefulness of PSMs for achieving outcomes that can support decision making. Our findings show variation in the usefulness of the three approaches and the different workshop outcomes.",
author = "Elena Tavella",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.016",
language = "English",
volume = "275",
pages = "1020--1036",
journal = "European Journal of Operational Research",
issn = "0377-2217",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

On the usefulness of soft OR models in decision making : A comparison of Problem Structuring Methods supported and self-organized workshops. / Tavella, Elena.

I: European Journal of Operational Research, Bind 275, Nr. 3, 06.2019, s. 1020-1036.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the usefulness of soft OR models in decision making

T2 - A comparison of Problem Structuring Methods supported and self-organized workshops

AU - Tavella, Elena

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - Applications of Problem Structuring Methods (PSMs) are extensively reported in the literature; however, their evaluation remains challenging. Moreover, scholars’ disagreement on how to evaluate and compare PSMs constrains research that seeks to show whether certain PSMs are more useful than others within particular contexts and ‘better than doing nothing’. Drawing on scholars’ suggestion to evaluate PSMs through a link between action, outcomes and context, we address this gap by adopting an exploratory, quasi-experimental research design with MSc students to evaluate and compare three workshops supported by the use of (i) Strategic Choice Approach, (ii) Soft Systems Methodology and (iii) a non-PSM supported approach, and report on the findings of a quantitative and qualitative analysis. We explore the usefulness of PSMs for achieving outcomes that can support decision making. Our findings show variation in the usefulness of the three approaches and the different workshop outcomes.

AB - Applications of Problem Structuring Methods (PSMs) are extensively reported in the literature; however, their evaluation remains challenging. Moreover, scholars’ disagreement on how to evaluate and compare PSMs constrains research that seeks to show whether certain PSMs are more useful than others within particular contexts and ‘better than doing nothing’. Drawing on scholars’ suggestion to evaluate PSMs through a link between action, outcomes and context, we address this gap by adopting an exploratory, quasi-experimental research design with MSc students to evaluate and compare three workshops supported by the use of (i) Strategic Choice Approach, (ii) Soft Systems Methodology and (iii) a non-PSM supported approach, and report on the findings of a quantitative and qualitative analysis. We explore the usefulness of PSMs for achieving outcomes that can support decision making. Our findings show variation in the usefulness of the three approaches and the different workshop outcomes.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.016

DO - 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.016

M3 - Journal article

VL - 275

SP - 1020

EP - 1036

JO - European Journal of Operational Research

JF - European Journal of Operational Research

SN - 0377-2217

IS - 3

ER -