On the production of territorial stigmatisation: a review of the literature

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

The concept of territorial stigmatisation has garnered increasing attention over the past decade. Studies from across six continents confirm and contribute to the concept’s growing relevance in explaining the social and symbolic dimensions of advanced and urban marginality. However, the debates remain fragmented, and most studies have focused more on confirming and expounding upon the impact of territorial stigmatisation than on its production. This review is based on an inductive analysis of 119 peer-reviewed articles, and focuses on the production of territorial stigmatisation. To provide an overview of this fragmented field of research, and to bring structure to the debates, we identify six distinct yet broad and partly overlapping ‘areas of research’ on the production of territorial stigmatisation. Within these, we identify 16 different ‘modes of production’ of territorial stigmatisation. In conclusion, we argue that one reason for the persistence of territorial stigmatisation, once established, is due to a high degree of flexibility in how it is produced. More specifically, several modes of production may operate simultaneously depending on context and place. We call for the concept to be further developed and propose to incorporate the six areas of research which we have identified as components of a more comprehensive conceptualization of territorial stigmatisation. Finally, we point toward a number of gaps in the literature which could strengthen our knowledge of, and inform our strategies to counter, territorial stigmatisation.
OriginalsprogDansk
TidsskriftCity
Sider (fra-til)1
Antal sider50
ISSN1360-4813
StatusAccepteret/In press - 2019

Emneord

  • territorial stigmatization
  • literature review
  • mode of production
  • stigma
  • Production of territorial stigmatization
  • Wacquant

Citer dette

@article{8b1f52393e5c4fdb875cbd883d656873,
title = "On the production of territorial stigmatisation: a review of the literature",
abstract = "The concept of territorial stigmatisation has garnered increasing attention over the past decade. Studies from across six continents confirm and contribute to the concept’s growing relevance in explaining the social and symbolic dimensions of advanced and urban marginality. However, the debates remain fragmented, and most studies have focused more on confirming and expounding upon the impact of territorial stigmatisation than on its production. This review is based on an inductive analysis of 119 peer-reviewed articles, and focuses on the production of territorial stigmatisation. To provide an overview of this fragmented field of research, and to bring structure to the debates, we identify six distinct yet broad and partly overlapping ‘areas of research’ on the production of territorial stigmatisation. Within these, we identify 16 different ‘modes of production’ of territorial stigmatisation. In conclusion, we argue that one reason for the persistence of territorial stigmatisation, once established, is due to a high degree of flexibility in how it is produced. More specifically, several modes of production may operate simultaneously depending on context and place. We call for the concept to be further developed and propose to incorporate the six areas of research which we have identified as components of a more comprehensive conceptualization of territorial stigmatisation. Finally, we point toward a number of gaps in the literature which could strengthen our knowledge of, and inform our strategies to counter, territorial stigmatisation.",
keywords = "territorial stigmatization, literature review, mode of production, stigma, Production of territorial stigmatization, Wacquant",
author = "Larsen, {Troels Schultz} and Delica, {Kristian Nagel}",
year = "2019",
language = "Dansk",
pages = "1",
journal = "City",
issn = "1360-4813",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

On the production of territorial stigmatisation: a review of the literature. / Larsen, Troels Schultz; Delica, Kristian Nagel.

I: City, 2019, s. 1.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the production of territorial stigmatisation: a review of the literature

AU - Larsen, Troels Schultz

AU - Delica, Kristian Nagel

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The concept of territorial stigmatisation has garnered increasing attention over the past decade. Studies from across six continents confirm and contribute to the concept’s growing relevance in explaining the social and symbolic dimensions of advanced and urban marginality. However, the debates remain fragmented, and most studies have focused more on confirming and expounding upon the impact of territorial stigmatisation than on its production. This review is based on an inductive analysis of 119 peer-reviewed articles, and focuses on the production of territorial stigmatisation. To provide an overview of this fragmented field of research, and to bring structure to the debates, we identify six distinct yet broad and partly overlapping ‘areas of research’ on the production of territorial stigmatisation. Within these, we identify 16 different ‘modes of production’ of territorial stigmatisation. In conclusion, we argue that one reason for the persistence of territorial stigmatisation, once established, is due to a high degree of flexibility in how it is produced. More specifically, several modes of production may operate simultaneously depending on context and place. We call for the concept to be further developed and propose to incorporate the six areas of research which we have identified as components of a more comprehensive conceptualization of territorial stigmatisation. Finally, we point toward a number of gaps in the literature which could strengthen our knowledge of, and inform our strategies to counter, territorial stigmatisation.

AB - The concept of territorial stigmatisation has garnered increasing attention over the past decade. Studies from across six continents confirm and contribute to the concept’s growing relevance in explaining the social and symbolic dimensions of advanced and urban marginality. However, the debates remain fragmented, and most studies have focused more on confirming and expounding upon the impact of territorial stigmatisation than on its production. This review is based on an inductive analysis of 119 peer-reviewed articles, and focuses on the production of territorial stigmatisation. To provide an overview of this fragmented field of research, and to bring structure to the debates, we identify six distinct yet broad and partly overlapping ‘areas of research’ on the production of territorial stigmatisation. Within these, we identify 16 different ‘modes of production’ of territorial stigmatisation. In conclusion, we argue that one reason for the persistence of territorial stigmatisation, once established, is due to a high degree of flexibility in how it is produced. More specifically, several modes of production may operate simultaneously depending on context and place. We call for the concept to be further developed and propose to incorporate the six areas of research which we have identified as components of a more comprehensive conceptualization of territorial stigmatisation. Finally, we point toward a number of gaps in the literature which could strengthen our knowledge of, and inform our strategies to counter, territorial stigmatisation.

KW - territorial stigmatization

KW - literature review

KW - mode of production

KW - stigma

KW - Production of territorial stigmatization

KW - Wacquant

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

SP - 1

JO - City

JF - City

SN - 1360-4813

ER -