On not showing scalps

Human remains and multisited debate at the National Museum of Denmark

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Museums are increasingly taking the cultural values of source communities into account in their representational strategies, and that means that they now face the challenge of explaining to their publics how social responsibility toward distant source communities informs the choices each museum makes. This article examines how the National Museum of Denmark attempted to inform and discuss with the Danish public the museum’s decision to not exhibit scalps in their temporary exhibition on Native American culture, Powwow: We Dance, We’re Alive. Building on the new, contingent museum ethics proposed by Janet Marstine, the editor of the Routledge Companion to Museum Ethics, I show how the museum succeeded in engaging users in questions of museum ethics. However, this specific debate on human remains in museums developed
into an encounter between a global, museological discourse on the responsibility of museum institutions toward indigenous groups and a common discourse in Danish political debates that views consideration toward the
sensibilities of specific ethnic groups as a threat toward free speech and rational knowledge.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftMuseum Anthropology
Vol/bind39
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)20–34
Antal sider15
ISSN0892-8339
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2016

Citer dette

@article{6a33e608bd874c2392455ebfbad043cd,
title = "On not showing scalps: Human remains and multisited debate at the National Museum of Denmark",
abstract = "Museums are increasingly taking the cultural values of source communities into account in their representational strategies, and that means that they now face the challenge of explaining to their publics how social responsibility toward distant source communities informs the choices each museum makes. This article examines how the National Museum of Denmark attempted to inform and discuss with the Danish public the museum’s decision to not exhibit scalps in their temporary exhibition on Native American culture, Powwow: We Dance, We’re Alive. Building on the new, contingent museum ethics proposed by Janet Marstine, the editor of the Routledge Companion to Museum Ethics, I show how the museum succeeded in engaging users in questions of museum ethics. However, this specific debate on human remains in museums developedinto an encounter between a global, museological discourse on the responsibility of museum institutions toward indigenous groups and a common discourse in Danish political debates that views consideration toward thesensibilities of specific ethnic groups as a threat toward free speech and rational knowledge.",
keywords = "social media, human remains, National Museum of Denmark, source communities",
author = "Marselis, {Randi Lorenz}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1111/muan.12106",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "20–34",
journal = "Museum Anthropology",
issn = "0892-8339",
publisher = "American Anthropological Association",
number = "1",

}

On not showing scalps : Human remains and multisited debate at the National Museum of Denmark. / Marselis, Randi Lorenz.

I: Museum Anthropology, Bind 39, Nr. 1, 2016, s. 20–34.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - On not showing scalps

T2 - Human remains and multisited debate at the National Museum of Denmark

AU - Marselis, Randi Lorenz

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Museums are increasingly taking the cultural values of source communities into account in their representational strategies, and that means that they now face the challenge of explaining to their publics how social responsibility toward distant source communities informs the choices each museum makes. This article examines how the National Museum of Denmark attempted to inform and discuss with the Danish public the museum’s decision to not exhibit scalps in their temporary exhibition on Native American culture, Powwow: We Dance, We’re Alive. Building on the new, contingent museum ethics proposed by Janet Marstine, the editor of the Routledge Companion to Museum Ethics, I show how the museum succeeded in engaging users in questions of museum ethics. However, this specific debate on human remains in museums developedinto an encounter between a global, museological discourse on the responsibility of museum institutions toward indigenous groups and a common discourse in Danish political debates that views consideration toward thesensibilities of specific ethnic groups as a threat toward free speech and rational knowledge.

AB - Museums are increasingly taking the cultural values of source communities into account in their representational strategies, and that means that they now face the challenge of explaining to their publics how social responsibility toward distant source communities informs the choices each museum makes. This article examines how the National Museum of Denmark attempted to inform and discuss with the Danish public the museum’s decision to not exhibit scalps in their temporary exhibition on Native American culture, Powwow: We Dance, We’re Alive. Building on the new, contingent museum ethics proposed by Janet Marstine, the editor of the Routledge Companion to Museum Ethics, I show how the museum succeeded in engaging users in questions of museum ethics. However, this specific debate on human remains in museums developedinto an encounter between a global, museological discourse on the responsibility of museum institutions toward indigenous groups and a common discourse in Danish political debates that views consideration toward thesensibilities of specific ethnic groups as a threat toward free speech and rational knowledge.

KW - social media

KW - human remains

KW - National Museum of Denmark

KW - source communities

U2 - 10.1111/muan.12106

DO - 10.1111/muan.12106

M3 - Journal article

VL - 39

SP - 20

EP - 34

JO - Museum Anthropology

JF - Museum Anthropology

SN - 0892-8339

IS - 1

ER -