Non-normative Critique

Foucault and Pragmatic Sociology as Tactical Re-politicization

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

The close ties between modes of governing, subjectivities and critique in contemporary societies challenge the role of critical social research. The classical normative ethos of the unmasking researcher unravelling various oppressive structures of dominant vs. dominated groups in society is inadequate when it comes to understand de-politicizing mechanisms and the struggles they bring about. This article argues that only a nonnormative position can stay attentive to the constant and complex evolution of modes of governing and the critical operations actors themselves engage in. The article outlines a non-normative but critical programme based on an ethos of re-politicizing contemporary pervasive modes of governing. The analytical advantages and limitations of such a programme are demonstrated by readings of both Foucauldian studies and the works of and debates regarding the French pragmatic sociology of Boltanski and Thévenot.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEuropean Journal of Social Theory
Vol/bind19
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)127-145
Antal sider19
ISSN1368-4310
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2016
Udgivet eksterntJa

Citer dette

@article{02be12bada2245ce9daded7d33c208a0,
title = "Non-normative Critique: Foucault and Pragmatic Sociology as Tactical Re-politicization",
abstract = "The close ties between modes of governing, subjectivities and critique in contemporary societies challenge the role of critical social research. The classical normative ethos of the unmasking researcher unravelling various oppressive structures of dominant vs. dominated groups in society is inadequate when it comes to understand de-politicizing mechanisms and the struggles they bring about. This article argues that only a nonnormative position can stay attentive to the constant and complex evolution of modes of governing and the critical operations actors themselves engage in. The article outlines a non-normative but critical programme based on an ethos of re-politicizing contemporary pervasive modes of governing. The analytical advantages and limitations of such a programme are demonstrated by readings of both Foucauldian studies and the works of and debates regarding the French pragmatic sociology of Boltanski and Th{\'e}venot.",
author = "Hansen, {Magnus Paulsen}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1177/1368431014562705",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "127--145",
journal = "European Journal of Social Theory",
issn = "1368-4310",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

Non-normative Critique : Foucault and Pragmatic Sociology as Tactical Re-politicization. / Hansen, Magnus Paulsen.

I: European Journal of Social Theory, Bind 19, Nr. 1, 2016, s. 127-145.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-normative Critique

T2 - Foucault and Pragmatic Sociology as Tactical Re-politicization

AU - Hansen, Magnus Paulsen

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The close ties between modes of governing, subjectivities and critique in contemporary societies challenge the role of critical social research. The classical normative ethos of the unmasking researcher unravelling various oppressive structures of dominant vs. dominated groups in society is inadequate when it comes to understand de-politicizing mechanisms and the struggles they bring about. This article argues that only a nonnormative position can stay attentive to the constant and complex evolution of modes of governing and the critical operations actors themselves engage in. The article outlines a non-normative but critical programme based on an ethos of re-politicizing contemporary pervasive modes of governing. The analytical advantages and limitations of such a programme are demonstrated by readings of both Foucauldian studies and the works of and debates regarding the French pragmatic sociology of Boltanski and Thévenot.

AB - The close ties between modes of governing, subjectivities and critique in contemporary societies challenge the role of critical social research. The classical normative ethos of the unmasking researcher unravelling various oppressive structures of dominant vs. dominated groups in society is inadequate when it comes to understand de-politicizing mechanisms and the struggles they bring about. This article argues that only a nonnormative position can stay attentive to the constant and complex evolution of modes of governing and the critical operations actors themselves engage in. The article outlines a non-normative but critical programme based on an ethos of re-politicizing contemporary pervasive modes of governing. The analytical advantages and limitations of such a programme are demonstrated by readings of both Foucauldian studies and the works of and debates regarding the French pragmatic sociology of Boltanski and Thévenot.

U2 - 10.1177/1368431014562705

DO - 10.1177/1368431014562705

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

SP - 127

EP - 145

JO - European Journal of Social Theory

JF - European Journal of Social Theory

SN - 1368-4310

IS - 1

ER -