National varieties of public-private partnerships (PPPs): A comparative analysis of PPP-supporting units in 19 European countries

Martijn Van den Hurk, Lena Brogaard, Veiko Lember, Ole Helby Petersen, Petr Witz

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Most countries that have adopted the public–private partnership (PPP) model as a means of implementing infrastructure projects have launched dedicated supporting units to guide policy development and stimulate project implementation. This paper draws on the theoretical notion of PPP-enabling fields to carry out a comparative analysis of the roles and functions of PPP-supporting units across 19 European countries with varying PPP experiences. We distinguish four categories of national support of PPPs, from skeptical systems of zero support to full-fledged PPP systems. Furthermore, we take initial steps to analyze the possible link between national differences in institutionalized PPP support and the amount of implemented PPP projects. Finally, pathways for further research on PPP-supporting units are discussed.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Comparative Policy Analysis
Vol/bind18
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)1-20
ISSN1387-6988
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2016

Citer dette

@article{b5a273d2a7d04d778bbd08f81d0b1582,
title = "National varieties of public-private partnerships (PPPs): A comparative analysis of PPP-supporting units in 19 European countries",
abstract = "Most countries that have adopted the public–private partnership (PPP) model as a means of implementing infrastructure projects have launched dedicated supporting units to guide policy development and stimulate project implementation. This paper draws on the theoretical notion of PPP-enabling fields to carry out a comparative analysis of the roles and functions of PPP-supporting units across 19 European countries with varying PPP experiences. We distinguish four categories of national support of PPPs, from skeptical systems of zero support to full-fledged PPP systems. Furthermore, we take initial steps to analyze the possible link between national differences in institutionalized PPP support and the amount of implemented PPP projects. Finally, pathways for further research on PPP-supporting units are discussed.",
author = "{Van den Hurk}, Martijn and Lena Brogaard and Veiko Lember and Petersen, {Ole Helby} and Petr Witz",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/13876988.2015.1006814",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis",
issn = "1387-6988",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

National varieties of public-private partnerships (PPPs) : A comparative analysis of PPP-supporting units in 19 European countries. / Van den Hurk, Martijn; Brogaard, Lena; Lember, Veiko; Petersen, Ole Helby; Witz, Petr.

I: Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, Bind 18, Nr. 1, 2016, s. 1-20.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - National varieties of public-private partnerships (PPPs)

T2 - A comparative analysis of PPP-supporting units in 19 European countries

AU - Van den Hurk, Martijn

AU - Brogaard, Lena

AU - Lember, Veiko

AU - Petersen, Ole Helby

AU - Witz, Petr

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Most countries that have adopted the public–private partnership (PPP) model as a means of implementing infrastructure projects have launched dedicated supporting units to guide policy development and stimulate project implementation. This paper draws on the theoretical notion of PPP-enabling fields to carry out a comparative analysis of the roles and functions of PPP-supporting units across 19 European countries with varying PPP experiences. We distinguish four categories of national support of PPPs, from skeptical systems of zero support to full-fledged PPP systems. Furthermore, we take initial steps to analyze the possible link between national differences in institutionalized PPP support and the amount of implemented PPP projects. Finally, pathways for further research on PPP-supporting units are discussed.

AB - Most countries that have adopted the public–private partnership (PPP) model as a means of implementing infrastructure projects have launched dedicated supporting units to guide policy development and stimulate project implementation. This paper draws on the theoretical notion of PPP-enabling fields to carry out a comparative analysis of the roles and functions of PPP-supporting units across 19 European countries with varying PPP experiences. We distinguish four categories of national support of PPPs, from skeptical systems of zero support to full-fledged PPP systems. Furthermore, we take initial steps to analyze the possible link between national differences in institutionalized PPP support and the amount of implemented PPP projects. Finally, pathways for further research on PPP-supporting units are discussed.

U2 - 10.1080/13876988.2015.1006814

DO - 10.1080/13876988.2015.1006814

M3 - Journal article

VL - 18

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis

JF - Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis

SN - 1387-6988

IS - 1

ER -