National identity and law in the context of European integration

the case of Denmark

Anne Lise Kjær, Lene Palsbro

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    Nationalistic discourse is often associated with the flag waving of popular culture, political views of extremist right-wing parties or the routine rhetoric of ‘us’ versus ‘them’, pervading social life in general. However, nationalistic discourse is to be found even in academic writings by the professional elite of lawyers, who readily resort to ideological topoi of national identity and culture to support legal argument. Reporting from a comprehensive study on Danish academic and public debate on European human rights law, this article explores how the legal community of Denmark reacts emotionally and ideologically to legal integration in Europe. It is argued that the somewhat heated debate reflects points of instability within the social class of Danish jurists, who are engaged in a hegemonic struggle to construct
    or sustain positions of power within a national legal system under radical change.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftDiscourse & Society
    Vol/bind19
    Udgave nummer5
    Sider (fra-til)599-627
    ISSN0957-9265
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 2008

    Citer dette

    @article{c9487300b58111ddbe39000ea68e967b,
    title = "National identity and law in the context of European integration: the case of Denmark",
    abstract = "Nationalistic discourse is often associated with the flag waving of popular culture, political views of extremist right-wing parties or the routine rhetoric of ‘us’ versus ‘them’, pervading social life in general. However, nationalistic discourse is to be found even in academic writings by the professional elite of lawyers, who readily resort to ideological topoi of national identity and culture to support legal argument. Reporting from a comprehensive study on Danish academic and public debate on European human rights law, this article explores how the legal community of Denmark reacts emotionally and ideologically to legal integration in Europe. It is argued that the somewhat heated debate reflects points of instability within the social class of Danish jurists, who are engaged in a hegemonic struggle to constructor sustain positions of power within a national legal system under radical change.",
    keywords = "Denmark, discursive macro-strategies, European integration, hegemonic struggle, human rights law, legal discourse, national identity, social change",
    author = "Kj{\ae}r, {Anne Lise} and Lene Palsbro",
    year = "2008",
    doi = "10.1177/0957926508092245",
    language = "English",
    volume = "19",
    pages = "599--627",
    journal = "Discourse & Society",
    issn = "0957-9265",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications",
    number = "5",

    }

    National identity and law in the context of European integration : the case of Denmark. / Kjær, Anne Lise; Palsbro, Lene.

    I: Discourse & Society, Bind 19, Nr. 5, 2008, s. 599-627.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - National identity and law in the context of European integration

    T2 - the case of Denmark

    AU - Kjær, Anne Lise

    AU - Palsbro, Lene

    PY - 2008

    Y1 - 2008

    N2 - Nationalistic discourse is often associated with the flag waving of popular culture, political views of extremist right-wing parties or the routine rhetoric of ‘us’ versus ‘them’, pervading social life in general. However, nationalistic discourse is to be found even in academic writings by the professional elite of lawyers, who readily resort to ideological topoi of national identity and culture to support legal argument. Reporting from a comprehensive study on Danish academic and public debate on European human rights law, this article explores how the legal community of Denmark reacts emotionally and ideologically to legal integration in Europe. It is argued that the somewhat heated debate reflects points of instability within the social class of Danish jurists, who are engaged in a hegemonic struggle to constructor sustain positions of power within a national legal system under radical change.

    AB - Nationalistic discourse is often associated with the flag waving of popular culture, political views of extremist right-wing parties or the routine rhetoric of ‘us’ versus ‘them’, pervading social life in general. However, nationalistic discourse is to be found even in academic writings by the professional elite of lawyers, who readily resort to ideological topoi of national identity and culture to support legal argument. Reporting from a comprehensive study on Danish academic and public debate on European human rights law, this article explores how the legal community of Denmark reacts emotionally and ideologically to legal integration in Europe. It is argued that the somewhat heated debate reflects points of instability within the social class of Danish jurists, who are engaged in a hegemonic struggle to constructor sustain positions of power within a national legal system under radical change.

    KW - Denmark

    KW - discursive macro-strategies

    KW - European integration

    KW - hegemonic struggle

    KW - human rights law

    KW - legal discourse

    KW - national identity

    KW - social change

    U2 - 10.1177/0957926508092245

    DO - 10.1177/0957926508092245

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 19

    SP - 599

    EP - 627

    JO - Discourse & Society

    JF - Discourse & Society

    SN - 0957-9265

    IS - 5

    ER -