Mundane science use in a practice theoretical perspective

Different understandings of the relations between citizen-consumers and public communication initiatives build on scientific claims

Bente Halkier

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Public communication initiatives play a part in placing complicated scientific claims in citizen-consumers’ everyday contexts. Lay reactions to scientific claims framed in public communication, and attempts to engage citizens, have been important subjects of discussion in the literatures of public understanding and public engagement with science. Many of the public communication initiatives, however, address lay people as consumers rather than citizens. This creates specific challenges for understanding public engagement with science and scientific citizenship. The article compares five different understandings of the relations between citizen-consumers and public issue communication involving science, where the first four types are widely represented in the Public Understanding of Science discussions. The fifth understanding is a practice theoretical perspective. The article suggests how the public understanding of and engagement in science literature can benefit from including a practice theoretical approach to research about mundane science use and public engagement.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPublic Understanding of Science
Vol/bind26
Udgave nummer1
ISSN0963-6625
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2017

Bibliografisk note

This article has been found as a free version from the publisher on January 11. 2019. If the access is closed please notify rucforsk@ruc.dk

Citer dette

@article{8afe1b983f0f4b859c5d0913829f79e4,
title = "Mundane science use in a practice theoretical perspective: Different understandings of the relations between citizen-consumers and public communication initiatives build on scientific claims",
abstract = "Public communication initiatives play a part in placing complicated scientific claims in citizen-consumers’ everyday contexts. Lay reactions to scientific claims framed in public communication, and attempts to engage citizens, have been important subjects of discussion in the literatures of public understanding and public engagement with science. Many of the public communication initiatives, however, address lay people as consumers rather than citizens. This creates specific challenges for understanding public engagement with science and scientific citizenship. The article compares five different understandings of the relations between citizen-consumers and public issue communication involving science, where the first four types are widely represented in the Public Understanding of Science discussions. The fifth understanding is a practice theoretical perspective. The article suggests how the public understanding of and engagement in science literature can benefit from including a practice theoretical approach to research about mundane science use and public engagement.",
author = "Bente Halkier",
note = "This article has been found as a free version from the publisher on January 11. 2019. If the access is closed please notify rucforsk@ruc.dk",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1177/0963662515596314",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
journal = "Public Understanding of Science",
issn = "0963-6625",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mundane science use in a practice theoretical perspective

T2 - Different understandings of the relations between citizen-consumers and public communication initiatives build on scientific claims

AU - Halkier, Bente

N1 - This article has been found as a free version from the publisher on January 11. 2019. If the access is closed please notify rucforsk@ruc.dk

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Public communication initiatives play a part in placing complicated scientific claims in citizen-consumers’ everyday contexts. Lay reactions to scientific claims framed in public communication, and attempts to engage citizens, have been important subjects of discussion in the literatures of public understanding and public engagement with science. Many of the public communication initiatives, however, address lay people as consumers rather than citizens. This creates specific challenges for understanding public engagement with science and scientific citizenship. The article compares five different understandings of the relations between citizen-consumers and public issue communication involving science, where the first four types are widely represented in the Public Understanding of Science discussions. The fifth understanding is a practice theoretical perspective. The article suggests how the public understanding of and engagement in science literature can benefit from including a practice theoretical approach to research about mundane science use and public engagement.

AB - Public communication initiatives play a part in placing complicated scientific claims in citizen-consumers’ everyday contexts. Lay reactions to scientific claims framed in public communication, and attempts to engage citizens, have been important subjects of discussion in the literatures of public understanding and public engagement with science. Many of the public communication initiatives, however, address lay people as consumers rather than citizens. This creates specific challenges for understanding public engagement with science and scientific citizenship. The article compares five different understandings of the relations between citizen-consumers and public issue communication involving science, where the first four types are widely represented in the Public Understanding of Science discussions. The fifth understanding is a practice theoretical perspective. The article suggests how the public understanding of and engagement in science literature can benefit from including a practice theoretical approach to research about mundane science use and public engagement.

U2 - 10.1177/0963662515596314

DO - 10.1177/0963662515596314

M3 - Journal article

VL - 26

JO - Public Understanding of Science

JF - Public Understanding of Science

SN - 0963-6625

IS - 1

ER -