Multipolaritet eller kosmopolitanisme? En kritik af Mouffe fra et hegemoniteoretisk perspektiv: A critique of Mouffe from a hegemony-theoretical perspective

    Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskning

    Resumé

    In a series of publications Chantal Mouffe (2004, 2005a, 2005b, 2008, 2009, 2013) has criticized cosmopolitanism for its lack of conceptualization of power, conflict and struggle, in short of politics. Even though this critique is largely well placed, the conclusions drawn from the analysis by Mouffe are flawed. As she puts it, if a cosmopolitan democracy “was ever realized, it could only signify the world hegemony of a dominant power that would have been able to impose its conception of the world on the entire planet and which, identifying its interests with those of humanity, would treat any disagreement as an illegitimate challenge to its ‘rational’ leadership”. Mouffe, On the Political pp. 106–7. I argue that Mouffe paradoxically seems to be using a traditional 'realist' conceptualization of hegemony, signifying simply domination. Against this I argue that a post-structuralist understanding of hegemony – as developed by herself and Laclau in Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, (Laclau and Mouffe,1985), precisely allows us to see the distance between universal values, such as freedom and equality for all, and their actual interpretation and use. The fact that the West are using democracy and human rights as legitimating devises for non-democratic goals, should not make us abandon the realization of these values on the global scale as the political goal.
    Bidragets oversatte titelMultipolaritet eller kosmopolitanisme? En kritik af Mouffe fra et hegemoniteoretisk perspektiv
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    Publikationsdato26 mar. 2014
    Antal sider16
    StatusUdgivet - 26 mar. 2014
    BegivenhedISA's 55th Annual Convention: Spaces and Places Geopolitics in an Era of Globalization - Toronto, Canada
    Varighed: 26 mar. 201429 mar. 2014
    http://www.isanet.org/Conferences/Toronto-2014

    Konference

    KonferenceISA's 55th Annual Convention
    LandCanada
    ByToronto
    Periode26/03/201429/03/2014
    Internetadresse

    Emneord

    • Mouffe
    • multipolarity
    • cosmopolitanism
    • democracy
    • hegemony
    • post-structuralism

    Citer dette

    Hansen, A. D. (2014). Multipolarity or cosmopolitanism? A critique of Mouffe from a hegemony-theoretical perspective. Afhandling præsenteret på ISA's 55th Annual Convention, Toronto, Canada.
    Hansen, Allan Dreyer. / Multipolarity or cosmopolitanism? A critique of Mouffe from a hegemony-theoretical perspective. Afhandling præsenteret på ISA's 55th Annual Convention, Toronto, Canada.16 s.
    @conference{b5a29d24e9c745039199b425bf86b903,
    title = "Multipolarity or cosmopolitanism?: A critique of Mouffe from a hegemony-theoretical perspective",
    abstract = "In a series of publications Chantal Mouffe (2004, 2005a, 2005b, 2008, 2009, 2013) has criticized cosmopolitanism for its lack of conceptualization of power, conflict and struggle, in short of politics. Even though this critique is largely well placed, the conclusions drawn from the analysis by Mouffe are flawed. As she puts it, if a cosmopolitan democracy “was ever realized, it could only signify the world hegemony of a dominant power that would have been able to impose its conception of the world on the entire planet and which, identifying its interests with those of humanity, would treat any disagreement as an illegitimate challenge to its ‘rational’ leadership”. Mouffe, On the Political pp. 106–7. I argue that Mouffe paradoxically seems to be using a traditional 'realist' conceptualization of hegemony, signifying simply domination. Against this I argue that a post-structuralist understanding of hegemony – as developed by herself and Laclau in Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, (Laclau and Mouffe,1985), precisely allows us to see the distance between universal values, such as freedom and equality for all, and their actual interpretation and use. The fact that the West are using democracy and human rights as legitimating devises for non-democratic goals, should not make us abandon the realization of these values on the global scale as the political goal.",
    keywords = "Mouffe, multipolarity , cosmopolitanism, democracy, hegemony, post-structuralism",
    author = "Hansen, {Allan Dreyer}",
    year = "2014",
    month = "3",
    day = "26",
    language = "English",
    note = "International Studies Association Annual Convention, ISA ; Conference date: 26-03-2014 Through 29-03-2014",
    url = "http://www.isanet.org/Conferences/Toronto-2014",

    }

    Hansen, AD 2014, 'Multipolarity or cosmopolitanism? A critique of Mouffe from a hegemony-theoretical perspective' Paper fremlagt ved ISA's 55th Annual Convention, Toronto, Canada, 26/03/2014 - 29/03/2014, .

    Multipolarity or cosmopolitanism? A critique of Mouffe from a hegemony-theoretical perspective. / Hansen, Allan Dreyer.

    2014. Afhandling præsenteret på ISA's 55th Annual Convention, Toronto, Canada.

    Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskning

    TY - CONF

    T1 - Multipolarity or cosmopolitanism?

    T2 - A critique of Mouffe from a hegemony-theoretical perspective

    AU - Hansen, Allan Dreyer

    PY - 2014/3/26

    Y1 - 2014/3/26

    N2 - In a series of publications Chantal Mouffe (2004, 2005a, 2005b, 2008, 2009, 2013) has criticized cosmopolitanism for its lack of conceptualization of power, conflict and struggle, in short of politics. Even though this critique is largely well placed, the conclusions drawn from the analysis by Mouffe are flawed. As she puts it, if a cosmopolitan democracy “was ever realized, it could only signify the world hegemony of a dominant power that would have been able to impose its conception of the world on the entire planet and which, identifying its interests with those of humanity, would treat any disagreement as an illegitimate challenge to its ‘rational’ leadership”. Mouffe, On the Political pp. 106–7. I argue that Mouffe paradoxically seems to be using a traditional 'realist' conceptualization of hegemony, signifying simply domination. Against this I argue that a post-structuralist understanding of hegemony – as developed by herself and Laclau in Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, (Laclau and Mouffe,1985), precisely allows us to see the distance between universal values, such as freedom and equality for all, and their actual interpretation and use. The fact that the West are using democracy and human rights as legitimating devises for non-democratic goals, should not make us abandon the realization of these values on the global scale as the political goal.

    AB - In a series of publications Chantal Mouffe (2004, 2005a, 2005b, 2008, 2009, 2013) has criticized cosmopolitanism for its lack of conceptualization of power, conflict and struggle, in short of politics. Even though this critique is largely well placed, the conclusions drawn from the analysis by Mouffe are flawed. As she puts it, if a cosmopolitan democracy “was ever realized, it could only signify the world hegemony of a dominant power that would have been able to impose its conception of the world on the entire planet and which, identifying its interests with those of humanity, would treat any disagreement as an illegitimate challenge to its ‘rational’ leadership”. Mouffe, On the Political pp. 106–7. I argue that Mouffe paradoxically seems to be using a traditional 'realist' conceptualization of hegemony, signifying simply domination. Against this I argue that a post-structuralist understanding of hegemony – as developed by herself and Laclau in Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, (Laclau and Mouffe,1985), precisely allows us to see the distance between universal values, such as freedom and equality for all, and their actual interpretation and use. The fact that the West are using democracy and human rights as legitimating devises for non-democratic goals, should not make us abandon the realization of these values on the global scale as the political goal.

    KW - Mouffe

    KW - multipolarity

    KW - cosmopolitanism

    KW - democracy

    KW - hegemony

    KW - post-structuralism

    M3 - Paper

    ER -

    Hansen AD. Multipolarity or cosmopolitanism? A critique of Mouffe from a hegemony-theoretical perspective. 2014. Afhandling præsenteret på ISA's 55th Annual Convention, Toronto, Canada.