Minding Rights: Mapping Ethical and Legal Foundations of ‘Neurorights’

Sjors Ligthart; Marcello Ienca; Gerben Meynen; Fruzsina Molnar-Gabor; Roberto Andorno; Christoph Bublitz; Paul Catley; Lisa Claydon; Thomas Douglas; Nita Farahany; Joseph J. Fins; Sara Goering; Pim Haselager; Fabrice Jotterand; Andrea Lavazza; Allan McCay; Abel Wajnerman Paz; Stephen Rainey; Jesper Ryberg; Philipp Kellmeyer

doi:10.1017/S0963180123000245

Minding Rights: Mapping Ethical and Legal Foundations of ‘Neurorights’

Sjors Ligthart, Marcello Ienca, Gerben Meynen, Fruzsina Molnar-Gabor, Roberto Andorno, Christoph Bublitz, Paul Catley, Lisa Claydon, Thomas Douglas, Nita Farahany, Joseph J. Fins, Sara Goering, Pim Haselager, Fabrice Jotterand, Andrea Lavazza, Allan McCay, Abel Wajnerman Paz, Stephen Rainey, Jesper Ryberg, Philipp Kellmeyer^*

^*Corresponding author

Institut for Kommunikation og Humanistisk Videnskab

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

Abstract

The rise of neurotechnologies, especially in combination with artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods for brain data analytics, has given rise to concerns around the protection of mental privacy, mental integrity and cognitive liberty – often framed as “neurorights” in ethical, legal, and policy discussions. Several states are now looking at including neurorights into their constitutional legal frameworks, and international institutions and organizations, such as UNESCO and the Council of Europe, are taking an active interest in developing international policy and governance guidelines on this issue. However, in many discussions of neurorights the philosophical assumptions, ethical frames of reference and legal interpretation are either not made explicit or conflict with each other. The aim of this multidisciplinary work is to provide conceptual, ethical, and legal foundations that allow for facilitating a common minimalist conceptual understanding of mental privacy, mental integrity, and cognitive liberty to facilitate scholarly, legal, and policy discussions.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Vol/bind	32
Udgave nummer	4
Sider (fra-til)	461-481
Antal sider	21
ISSN	0963-1801
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180123000245
Status	Udgivet - 1 okt. 2023

Link til dokument

10.1017/S0963180123000245Licens: CC BY-NC-ND

Minding Rights: Mapping Ethical and Legal Foundations of ‘Neurorights’Forlagets udgivne version, 383 KBLicens: CC BY-NC-ND

Citer dette

Ligthart, S., Ienca, M., Meynen, G., Molnar-Gabor, F., Andorno, R., Bublitz, C., Catley, P., Claydon, L., Douglas, T., Farahany, N., Fins, J. J., Goering, S., Haselager, P., Jotterand, F., Lavazza, A., McCay, A., Paz, A. W., Rainey, S., Ryberg, J., & Kellmeyer, P. (2023). Minding Rights: Mapping Ethical and Legal Foundations of ‘Neurorights’. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 32(4), 461-481. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180123000245

@article{b8c1661285d3458ba20b4bb8ed7f4681,

title = "Minding Rights: Mapping Ethical and Legal Foundations of {\textquoteleft}Neurorights{\textquoteright}",

abstract = "The rise of neurotechnologies, especially in combination with artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods for brain data analytics, has given rise to concerns around the protection of mental privacy, mental integrity and cognitive liberty – often framed as “neurorights” in ethical, legal, and policy discussions. Several states are now looking at including neurorights into their constitutional legal frameworks, and international institutions and organizations, such as UNESCO and the Council of Europe, are taking an active interest in developing international policy and governance guidelines on this issue. However, in many discussions of neurorights the philosophical assumptions, ethical frames of reference and legal interpretation are either not made explicit or conflict with each other. The aim of this multidisciplinary work is to provide conceptual, ethical, and legal foundations that allow for facilitating a common minimalist conceptual understanding of mental privacy, mental integrity, and cognitive liberty to facilitate scholarly, legal, and policy discussions.",

keywords = "Neurorights, cognitive liberty, mental integrity, mental privacy, neurotechnology",

author = "Sjors Ligthart and Marcello Ienca and Gerben Meynen and Fruzsina Molnar-Gabor and Roberto Andorno and Christoph Bublitz and Paul Catley and Lisa Claydon and Thomas Douglas and Nita Farahany and Fins, {Joseph J.} and Sara Goering and Pim Haselager and Fabrice Jotterand and Andrea Lavazza and Allan McCay and Paz, {Abel Wajnerman} and Stephen Rainey and Jesper Ryberg and Philipp Kellmeyer",

year = "2023",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1017/S0963180123000245",

language = "English",

volume = "32",

pages = "461--481",

journal = "Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics",

issn = "0963-1801",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "4",

}

Ligthart, S, Ienca, M, Meynen, G, Molnar-Gabor, F, Andorno, R, Bublitz, C, Catley, P, Claydon, L, Douglas, T, Farahany, N, Fins, JJ, Goering, S, Haselager, P, Jotterand, F, Lavazza, A, McCay, A, Paz, AW, Rainey, S, Ryberg, J & Kellmeyer, P 2023, 'Minding Rights: Mapping Ethical and Legal Foundations of ‘Neurorights’', Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, bind 32, nr. 4, s. 461-481. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180123000245

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minding Rights

T2 - Mapping Ethical and Legal Foundations of ‘Neurorights’

AU - Ligthart, Sjors

AU - Ienca, Marcello

AU - Meynen, Gerben

AU - Molnar-Gabor, Fruzsina

AU - Andorno, Roberto

AU - Bublitz, Christoph

AU - Catley, Paul

AU - Claydon, Lisa

AU - Douglas, Thomas

AU - Farahany, Nita

AU - Fins, Joseph J.

AU - Goering, Sara

AU - Haselager, Pim

AU - Jotterand, Fabrice

AU - Lavazza, Andrea

AU - McCay, Allan

AU - Paz, Abel Wajnerman

AU - Rainey, Stephen

AU - Ryberg, Jesper

AU - Kellmeyer, Philipp

PY - 2023/10/1

Y1 - 2023/10/1

N2 - The rise of neurotechnologies, especially in combination with artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods for brain data analytics, has given rise to concerns around the protection of mental privacy, mental integrity and cognitive liberty – often framed as “neurorights” in ethical, legal, and policy discussions. Several states are now looking at including neurorights into their constitutional legal frameworks, and international institutions and organizations, such as UNESCO and the Council of Europe, are taking an active interest in developing international policy and governance guidelines on this issue. However, in many discussions of neurorights the philosophical assumptions, ethical frames of reference and legal interpretation are either not made explicit or conflict with each other. The aim of this multidisciplinary work is to provide conceptual, ethical, and legal foundations that allow for facilitating a common minimalist conceptual understanding of mental privacy, mental integrity, and cognitive liberty to facilitate scholarly, legal, and policy discussions.

AB - The rise of neurotechnologies, especially in combination with artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods for brain data analytics, has given rise to concerns around the protection of mental privacy, mental integrity and cognitive liberty – often framed as “neurorights” in ethical, legal, and policy discussions. Several states are now looking at including neurorights into their constitutional legal frameworks, and international institutions and organizations, such as UNESCO and the Council of Europe, are taking an active interest in developing international policy and governance guidelines on this issue. However, in many discussions of neurorights the philosophical assumptions, ethical frames of reference and legal interpretation are either not made explicit or conflict with each other. The aim of this multidisciplinary work is to provide conceptual, ethical, and legal foundations that allow for facilitating a common minimalist conceptual understanding of mental privacy, mental integrity, and cognitive liberty to facilitate scholarly, legal, and policy discussions.

KW - Neurorights

KW - cognitive liberty

KW - mental integrity

KW - mental privacy

KW - neurotechnology

U2 - 10.1017/S0963180123000245

DO - 10.1017/S0963180123000245

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0963-1801

VL - 32

SP - 461

EP - 481

JO - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

JF - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

IS - 4

ER -