Militant democracy and the banning of political parties in democratic states

Why some do and why some don't

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

Resumé

This chapter examines contemporary practices of militant democracy in the case of party bans. This focus is pertinent insofar as party bans tend to be seen as the most militant, intolerant, or repressive measure to be deployed against anti-system parties or movements, and as such, the riskiest in terms of effects on democratic quality. After an overview of party ban cases in postwar Europe, the chapter evaluates explanations for why some democracies have banned parties while others have not. More specifically, it focuses on the distinctive experiences of new democracies, party orientations to violence, historical experiences of authoritarianism, the effectiveness of alternatives to party bans, the role of securitization discourses and the dynamics of democratic competition. The advantage of focusing on such explanations for party ban practices is that it permits the analyst to look beyond official rationales for party bans to understand how variation in political context, decision-making rules, political discourses and constellations of actor interests may influence what is ultimately a grave decision to limit access to both political power and the public sphere.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelMilitant Democracy : Political science, law and philosophy
RedaktørerAfshin Ellian, Bastiaan Rijpkema
Antal sider24
ForlagSpringer
Publikationsdato2018
Sider23-46
Kapitel2
ISBN (Trykt)978-3-319-97003-5
ISBN (Elektronisk)978-3-319-97004-2
StatusUdgivet - 2018
NavnPhilosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations
Nummer7
ISSN2352-8370

Citer dette

Bourne, A. (2018). Militant democracy and the banning of political parties in democratic states: Why some do and why some don't. I A. Ellian, & B. Rijpkema (red.), Militant Democracy: Political science, law and philosophy (s. 23-46). Springer. Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations, Nr. 7
Bourne, Angela. / Militant democracy and the banning of political parties in democratic states : Why some do and why some don't. Militant Democracy: Political science, law and philosophy. red. / Afshin Ellian ; Bastiaan Rijpkema. Springer, 2018. s. 23-46 (Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations; Nr. 7).
@inbook{d13689247514498d8902968233a256ad,
title = "Militant democracy and the banning of political parties in democratic states: Why some do and why some don't",
abstract = "This chapter examines contemporary practices of militant democracy in the case of party bans. This focus is pertinent insofar as party bans tend to be seen as the most militant, intolerant, or repressive measure to be deployed against anti-system parties or movements, and as such, the riskiest in terms of effects on democratic quality. After an overview of party ban cases in postwar Europe, the chapter evaluates explanations for why some democracies have banned parties while others have not. More specifically, it focuses on the distinctive experiences of new democracies, party orientations to violence, historical experiences of authoritarianism, the effectiveness of alternatives to party bans, the role of securitization discourses and the dynamics of democratic competition. The advantage of focusing on such explanations for party ban practices is that it permits the analyst to look beyond official rationales for party bans to understand how variation in political context, decision-making rules, political discourses and constellations of actor interests may influence what is ultimately a grave decision to limit access to both political power and the public sphere.",
keywords = "party bans, democratization, securitization, political violence, constitutional traditions, vetoplayers, historical legacies",
author = "Angela Bourne",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-97003-5",
pages = "23--46",
editor = "Afshin Ellian and Bastiaan Rijpkema",
booktitle = "Militant Democracy",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Bourne, A 2018, Militant democracy and the banning of political parties in democratic states: Why some do and why some don't. i A Ellian & B Rijpkema (red), Militant Democracy: Political science, law and philosophy. Springer, Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations, nr. 7, s. 23-46.

Militant democracy and the banning of political parties in democratic states : Why some do and why some don't. / Bourne, Angela.

Militant Democracy: Political science, law and philosophy. red. / Afshin Ellian; Bastiaan Rijpkema. Springer, 2018. s. 23-46 (Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations; Nr. 7).

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Militant democracy and the banning of political parties in democratic states

T2 - Why some do and why some don't

AU - Bourne, Angela

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This chapter examines contemporary practices of militant democracy in the case of party bans. This focus is pertinent insofar as party bans tend to be seen as the most militant, intolerant, or repressive measure to be deployed against anti-system parties or movements, and as such, the riskiest in terms of effects on democratic quality. After an overview of party ban cases in postwar Europe, the chapter evaluates explanations for why some democracies have banned parties while others have not. More specifically, it focuses on the distinctive experiences of new democracies, party orientations to violence, historical experiences of authoritarianism, the effectiveness of alternatives to party bans, the role of securitization discourses and the dynamics of democratic competition. The advantage of focusing on such explanations for party ban practices is that it permits the analyst to look beyond official rationales for party bans to understand how variation in political context, decision-making rules, political discourses and constellations of actor interests may influence what is ultimately a grave decision to limit access to both political power and the public sphere.

AB - This chapter examines contemporary practices of militant democracy in the case of party bans. This focus is pertinent insofar as party bans tend to be seen as the most militant, intolerant, or repressive measure to be deployed against anti-system parties or movements, and as such, the riskiest in terms of effects on democratic quality. After an overview of party ban cases in postwar Europe, the chapter evaluates explanations for why some democracies have banned parties while others have not. More specifically, it focuses on the distinctive experiences of new democracies, party orientations to violence, historical experiences of authoritarianism, the effectiveness of alternatives to party bans, the role of securitization discourses and the dynamics of democratic competition. The advantage of focusing on such explanations for party ban practices is that it permits the analyst to look beyond official rationales for party bans to understand how variation in political context, decision-making rules, political discourses and constellations of actor interests may influence what is ultimately a grave decision to limit access to both political power and the public sphere.

KW - party bans

KW - democratization

KW - securitization

KW - political violence

KW - constitutional traditions

KW - vetoplayers

KW - historical legacies

UR - https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319970035

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 978-3-319-97003-5

SP - 23

EP - 46

BT - Militant Democracy

A2 - Ellian, Afshin

A2 - Rijpkema, Bastiaan

PB - Springer

ER -

Bourne A. Militant democracy and the banning of political parties in democratic states: Why some do and why some don't. I Ellian A, Rijpkema B, red., Militant Democracy: Political science, law and philosophy. Springer. 2018. s. 23-46. (Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations; Nr. 7).