Mapping the Evaluation of Problem-Oriented Pedagogies in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Problem-oriented pedagogies have emerged as strategic way for universities to respond to an international higher education agenda that increasingly prioritises innovative, student-centred learning, and the cultivation of both civic and employability competences. Alongside this pedagogic shift is a policy-driven emphasis on monitoring teaching and learning for quality assurance purposes. This article aims to untangle the ways problem- and inquiry-based pedagogies are currently evaluated in universities, and thus consider how ‘quality’ implementation, and the effects of this suite of pedagogic approaches, might be better understood, practised, and measured. Taking a systematic approach to the review of the literature, the article maps evaluation methods that assess the effectiveness of problem-oriented and inquiry-based pedagogies implemented in university settings. The key findings include that evaluation methods in the field (i) prioritise qualification related outcomes, (ii) are limited in scale and scope, and (iii) often function as demonstrations of performativity rather than as part of an ongoing improvement cycle. The article argues that evaluations that take a multi-method approach from the perspective of a range of stakeholders, with an exploration of civic and social competences in addition to employability outcomes, would significantly strengthen the field.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer269
TidsskriftEducation Sciences
Vol/bind9
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)1-21
Antal sider21
ISSN2227-7102
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2019

Citer dette

@article{bba4bd92618142c5a33daf19dd665156,
title = "Mapping the Evaluation of Problem-Oriented Pedagogies in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review",
abstract = "Problem-oriented pedagogies have emerged as strategic way for universities to respond to an international higher education agenda that increasingly prioritises innovative, student-centred learning, and the cultivation of both civic and employability competences. Alongside this pedagogic shift is a policy-driven emphasis on monitoring teaching and learning for quality assurance purposes. This article aims to untangle the ways problem- and inquiry-based pedagogies are currently evaluated in universities, and thus consider how ‘quality’ implementation, and the effects of this suite of pedagogic approaches, might be better understood, practised, and measured. Taking a systematic approach to the review of the literature, the article maps evaluation methods that assess the effectiveness of problem-oriented and inquiry-based pedagogies implemented in university settings. The key findings include that evaluation methods in the field (i) prioritise qualification related outcomes, (ii) are limited in scale and scope, and (iii) often function as demonstrations of performativity rather than as part of an ongoing improvement cycle. The article argues that evaluations that take a multi-method approach from the perspective of a range of stakeholders, with an exploration of civic and social competences in addition to employability outcomes, would significantly strengthen the field.",
keywords = "Problem Based Learning, Inquiry-based learning, measurement, systematic literature review, higher education, quality assurance, pedagogic evaluation",
author = "Renae Acton",
year = "2019",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040269",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "Education Sciences",
issn = "2227-7102",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "4",

}

Mapping the Evaluation of Problem-Oriented Pedagogies in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. / Acton, Renae.

I: Education Sciences, Bind 9, Nr. 4, 269, 2019, s. 1-21.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mapping the Evaluation of Problem-Oriented Pedagogies in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review

AU - Acton, Renae

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Problem-oriented pedagogies have emerged as strategic way for universities to respond to an international higher education agenda that increasingly prioritises innovative, student-centred learning, and the cultivation of both civic and employability competences. Alongside this pedagogic shift is a policy-driven emphasis on monitoring teaching and learning for quality assurance purposes. This article aims to untangle the ways problem- and inquiry-based pedagogies are currently evaluated in universities, and thus consider how ‘quality’ implementation, and the effects of this suite of pedagogic approaches, might be better understood, practised, and measured. Taking a systematic approach to the review of the literature, the article maps evaluation methods that assess the effectiveness of problem-oriented and inquiry-based pedagogies implemented in university settings. The key findings include that evaluation methods in the field (i) prioritise qualification related outcomes, (ii) are limited in scale and scope, and (iii) often function as demonstrations of performativity rather than as part of an ongoing improvement cycle. The article argues that evaluations that take a multi-method approach from the perspective of a range of stakeholders, with an exploration of civic and social competences in addition to employability outcomes, would significantly strengthen the field.

AB - Problem-oriented pedagogies have emerged as strategic way for universities to respond to an international higher education agenda that increasingly prioritises innovative, student-centred learning, and the cultivation of both civic and employability competences. Alongside this pedagogic shift is a policy-driven emphasis on monitoring teaching and learning for quality assurance purposes. This article aims to untangle the ways problem- and inquiry-based pedagogies are currently evaluated in universities, and thus consider how ‘quality’ implementation, and the effects of this suite of pedagogic approaches, might be better understood, practised, and measured. Taking a systematic approach to the review of the literature, the article maps evaluation methods that assess the effectiveness of problem-oriented and inquiry-based pedagogies implemented in university settings. The key findings include that evaluation methods in the field (i) prioritise qualification related outcomes, (ii) are limited in scale and scope, and (iii) often function as demonstrations of performativity rather than as part of an ongoing improvement cycle. The article argues that evaluations that take a multi-method approach from the perspective of a range of stakeholders, with an exploration of civic and social competences in addition to employability outcomes, would significantly strengthen the field.

KW - Problem Based Learning

KW - Inquiry-based learning

KW - measurement

KW - systematic literature review

KW - higher education

KW - quality assurance

KW - pedagogic evaluation

U2 - https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040269

DO - https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040269

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - Education Sciences

JF - Education Sciences

SN - 2227-7102

IS - 4

M1 - 269

ER -