Lost in implementation?: REDD+ country readiness experiences in Indonesia and Vietnam

Thorkil Casse; Anders Milhøj; Martin Reinhardt Nielsen; Henrik Meilby; Yanto Rochmayanto

doi:10.1080/17565529.2018.1562870

Lost in implementation? REDD+ country readiness experiences in Indonesia and Vietnam

Bidragets oversatte titel: Tabt under implementering ? REDD+ politik i Indonesien og Vietnam

Thorkil Casse, Anders Milhøj, Martin Reinhardt Nielsen, Henrik Meilby, Yanto Rochmayanto

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

Abstract

Diskussion af REDD+ politik i Indonesien og Vietnam. Trods stor international fokus på dette instrument, som en måde at løse klimakrisen i mange udviklingslande og sikre skovbevarelse, er resultaterne ikke gode i de to lande. Mest af alt er der defineret forskellige politikker, men begge lande er meget langt fra implementering. Værst ser det ud i Indonesien.

Bidragets oversatte titel	Tabt under implementering ? REDD+ politik i Indonesien og Vietnam
Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Climate and Development
Vol/bind	11
Udgave nummer	9
Sider (fra-til)	799-811
Antal sider	12
ISSN	1756-5529
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2018.1562870
Status	Udgivet - 31 okt. 2019

Bibliografisk note

Important note from the Publisher regarding the attached version of the article: “This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Climate and Development on 09 Feb 2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17565529.2018.1562870 .”

Emneord

REDD+
Governance
Skovbevarelse
Implementering
Regerings støtte

Link til dokument

10.1080/17565529.2018.1562870

Lost in implementation final draft October 2018Accepteret manuskript, 848 KB

Citer dette

@article{8723c106af034fe7bcd777f80a1029aa,

title = "Lost in implementation?: REDD+ country readiness experiences in Indonesia and Vietnam",

abstract = "The REDD+ readiness phase leading up to implementation has been slow and has fallen short of expectations. In this article, we present REDD+ experiences from two countries, Indonesia and Vietnam, with a focus on the readiness phase, examining policy processes at the central, provincial and local levels. Interviews with key stakeholders (officials, donors, NGOs, village representatives) and data from household surveys suggest that efforts have been concentrated at the central level, with the provincial level mainly feeding data into the process and the local level practically left to its own devices. Furthermore, the REDD+ design may be misguided as it exempts the major stakeholders, namely the state and private enterprises, from declaring emissions sub-targets in the national carbon reduction action plans, and focuses exclusively on rural forest dwellers who struggle to understand the ideas that underpin REDD+.",

keywords = "REDD+, Governance, Skovbevarelse, Implementering, Regerings st{\o}tte, REDD+, Governance, Skovbevarelse, Implementering, Regerings st{\o}tte",

author = "Thorkil Casse and Anders Milh{\o}j and Nielsen, {Martin Reinhardt} and Henrik Meilby and Yanto Rochmayanto",

note = "Important note from the Publisher regarding the attached version of the article: “This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Climate and Development on 09 Feb 2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17565529.2018.1562870 .”",

year = "2019",

month = oct,

day = "31",

doi = "10.1080/17565529.2018.1562870",

language = "English",

volume = "11",

pages = "799--811",

journal = "Climate and Development",

issn = "1756-5529",

publisher = "Earthscan Ltd.",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lost in implementation?

T2 - REDD+ country readiness experiences in Indonesia and Vietnam

AU - Casse, Thorkil

AU - Milhøj, Anders

AU - Nielsen, Martin Reinhardt

AU - Meilby, Henrik

AU - Rochmayanto, Yanto

N1 - Important note from the Publisher regarding the attached version of the article: “This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Climate and Development on 09 Feb 2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17565529.2018.1562870 .”

PY - 2019/10/31

Y1 - 2019/10/31

N2 - The REDD+ readiness phase leading up to implementation has been slow and has fallen short of expectations. In this article, we present REDD+ experiences from two countries, Indonesia and Vietnam, with a focus on the readiness phase, examining policy processes at the central, provincial and local levels. Interviews with key stakeholders (officials, donors, NGOs, village representatives) and data from household surveys suggest that efforts have been concentrated at the central level, with the provincial level mainly feeding data into the process and the local level practically left to its own devices. Furthermore, the REDD+ design may be misguided as it exempts the major stakeholders, namely the state and private enterprises, from declaring emissions sub-targets in the national carbon reduction action plans, and focuses exclusively on rural forest dwellers who struggle to understand the ideas that underpin REDD+.

AB - The REDD+ readiness phase leading up to implementation has been slow and has fallen short of expectations. In this article, we present REDD+ experiences from two countries, Indonesia and Vietnam, with a focus on the readiness phase, examining policy processes at the central, provincial and local levels. Interviews with key stakeholders (officials, donors, NGOs, village representatives) and data from household surveys suggest that efforts have been concentrated at the central level, with the provincial level mainly feeding data into the process and the local level practically left to its own devices. Furthermore, the REDD+ design may be misguided as it exempts the major stakeholders, namely the state and private enterprises, from declaring emissions sub-targets in the national carbon reduction action plans, and focuses exclusively on rural forest dwellers who struggle to understand the ideas that underpin REDD+.

KW - REDD+

KW - Governance

KW - Skovbevarelse

KW - Implementering

KW - Regerings støtte

KW - REDD+

KW - Governance

KW - Skovbevarelse

KW - Implementering

KW - Regerings støtte

U2 - 10.1080/17565529.2018.1562870

DO - 10.1080/17565529.2018.1562870

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1756-5529

VL - 11

SP - 799

EP - 811

JO - Climate and Development

JF - Climate and Development

IS - 9

ER -