TY - JOUR
T1 - Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation
T2 - Insights from a European case study
AU - Hansen, Anne Vorre
AU - Fuglsang, Lars
AU - Liefooghe, Christine
AU - Rubalcaba, Luis
AU - Gago, David
AU - Mergel, Ines
AU - Haug, Nathalie
AU - Røhnebæk, Maria
AU - Mureddo, Francesco
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Living labs have gained increased attention in research and practice as both a practical and theoretical innovation phenomenon that emphasizes co-creation, real-life settings, and user/customer involvement. More recently, living labs have also emerged as a specific approach to open innovation processes in the context of publics across the EU. Nevertheless, it is still not clear how the understanding of living labs can be translated and organized into new sectorial settings, what type of public sector innovation challenges it addresses, and what role citizens and users have. The aim of this article is therefore to explore and analyze how living labs are applied as processes for public sector innovation. Based on a mixed method approach of 21 European living lab cases, the analysis reveals a pattern of three different processes for living lab organizational and actor roles: living labs organized as cross-sectorial collaboration, living labs emerging within the public sector as main initiator and beneficiary, and living labs developed by civil society actors. The findings are presented as three scenarios for implementing living labs, which also acts as a background for the article's final discussion about the potentials and pitfalls of living labs in public sector contexts.
AB - Living labs have gained increased attention in research and practice as both a practical and theoretical innovation phenomenon that emphasizes co-creation, real-life settings, and user/customer involvement. More recently, living labs have also emerged as a specific approach to open innovation processes in the context of publics across the EU. Nevertheless, it is still not clear how the understanding of living labs can be translated and organized into new sectorial settings, what type of public sector innovation challenges it addresses, and what role citizens and users have. The aim of this article is therefore to explore and analyze how living labs are applied as processes for public sector innovation. Based on a mixed method approach of 21 European living lab cases, the analysis reveals a pattern of three different processes for living lab organizational and actor roles: living labs organized as cross-sectorial collaboration, living labs emerging within the public sector as main initiator and beneficiary, and living labs developed by civil society actors. The findings are presented as three scenarios for implementing living labs, which also acts as a background for the article's final discussion about the potentials and pitfalls of living labs in public sector contexts.
KW - Living labs
KW - Public sector innovation
KW - Citizen engagement
KW - Co-creation
KW - Open innovation
U2 - 10.22215/timreview/1464
DO - 10.22215/timreview/1464
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1927-0321
VL - 11
SP - 47
EP - 58
JO - Technology Innovation Management Review
JF - Technology Innovation Management Review
IS - 9-10
ER -