Abstract
Based upon academic and clinical experience from Denmark this article aims to highlight inter-national research-based knowledge concerning challenging aspects about the understanding and implementation of recovery-oriented practice. Three key points are located: a) An integrative biopsychosocial approach considering both the clinical and personal recovery perspectives is relevant for research and practice. b) Barriers in implementing a recovery-oriented approach include both individual and systemic challenges. This is well documented in research-based literature highlighting the need for changes. c) A shift from professional‐control to service‐user orientation is seen as crucial. Examples of a positive shift are seen, helping the health professionals in their development and practicing of skills and competences through education and personal formation. Within these perspectives a paradigm shift from a one-dimensional biomedical approach to a
biopsychosocial approach, is suggested. Instead of focusing on rapid stabilization and symptom re-lief as a clinical outcome, a humanistic approach building on social- and person-oriented values is fundamental for social and personal recovery leading to a meaningful life.
biopsychosocial approach, is suggested. Instead of focusing on rapid stabilization and symptom re-lief as a clinical outcome, a humanistic approach building on social- and person-oriented values is fundamental for social and personal recovery leading to a meaningful life.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Artikelnummer | 2708 |
| Tidsskrift | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
| Vol/bind | 18 |
| Udgave nummer | 5 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 1-10 |
| Antal sider | 10 |
| ISSN | 1661-7827 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - mar. 2021 |
| Udgivet eksternt | Ja |
Citationsformater
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver