Gender Equality as a Closed Case

A Survey among the Members of the 2015 Danish Parliament.

Bidragets oversatte titel: Ligestilling som en afsluttet sag. En 2015-survey blandt medlemmerne af dte danske Folketing

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Despite almost unanimous adherence to the principle of gender equality in contemporary Denmark, a society with a long historical record of gender equality policies and almost 40 percent women in parliament, are there still divergences to be found among the members of parliament concerning gender equality principles and policies? This article argues that in order to identify underlying cleavages it is necessary to pose fundamental questions that go beyond the day-to-day disagreements on policy issues. Based on a new survey of the members of the Danish parliament, this study finds that the support for gender equality is not just a matter of lip service insofar as few MPs hold traditionalist views on women. However, the study reveals conflicting perceptions, left-right cleavages and gender gaps, sometimes also within the parties. A new discourse is identified, supported by a large minority that includes all of the male MPs from the four right-wing parties; this minority considers gender equality to be a ‘closed case’ – that is, as having by and large been achieved. This may provide clues to the puzzle of the stagnation in gender equality reforms in spite of the general support for ‘gender equality’. The article discusses the possible connection between the ‘closed case’ discourse, present neoliberal trends in society and the recent construction of gender equality as an ‘intrinsic Danish value’ – an argument familiar in other countries with a harsh debate over immigration.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftScandinavian Political Studies
Vol/bind41
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)188-209
Antal sider21
ISSN0080-6757
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018

Bibliografisk note

Første dybtgående survey blandt folketingsmedlemmerne om deres holdning til og engagement i ligestillingspolitik.

Emneord

  • gender equality
  • parliamentary survey
  • closed case

Citer dette

@article{40c0d92de3c34c82b9865bf569ff1b2e,
title = "Gender Equality as a Closed Case: A Survey among the Members of the 2015 Danish Parliament.",
abstract = "Despite almost unanimous adherence to the principle of gender equality in contemporary Denmark, a society with a long historical record of gender equality policies and almost 40 percent women in parliament, are there still divergences to be found among the members of parliament concerning gender equality principles and policies? This article argues that in order to identify underlying cleavages it is necessary to pose fundamental questions that go beyond the day‐to‐day disagreements on policy issues. Based on a new survey of the members of the Danish parliament, this study finds that the support for gender equality is not just a matter of lip service insofar as few MPs hold traditionalist views on women. However, the study reveals conflicting perceptions, left‐right cleavages and gender gaps, sometimes also within the parties. A new discourse is identified, supported by a large minority that includes all of the male MPs from the four right‐wing parties; this minority considers gender equality to be a ‘closed case’ – that is, as having by and large been achieved. This may provide clues to the puzzle of the stagnation in gender equality reforms in spite of the general support for ‘gender equality’. The article discusses the possible connection between the ‘closed case’ discourse, present neoliberal trends in society and the recent construction of gender equality as an ‘intrinsic Danish value’ – an argument familiar in other countries with a harsh debate over immigration.",
keywords = "gender equality, parliamentary survey, closed case",
author = "Drude Dahlerup",
note = "F{\o}rste dybtg{\aa}ende survey blandt folketingsmedlemmerne om deres holdning til og engagement i ligestillingspolitik.",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1111/1467-9477.12116",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "188--209",
journal = "Scandinavian Political Studies",
issn = "0080-6757",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Gender Equality as a Closed Case : A Survey among the Members of the 2015 Danish Parliament. / Dahlerup, Drude.

I: Scandinavian Political Studies, Bind 41, Nr. 2, 2018, s. 188-209.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender Equality as a Closed Case

T2 - A Survey among the Members of the 2015 Danish Parliament.

AU - Dahlerup, Drude

N1 - Første dybtgående survey blandt folketingsmedlemmerne om deres holdning til og engagement i ligestillingspolitik.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Despite almost unanimous adherence to the principle of gender equality in contemporary Denmark, a society with a long historical record of gender equality policies and almost 40 percent women in parliament, are there still divergences to be found among the members of parliament concerning gender equality principles and policies? This article argues that in order to identify underlying cleavages it is necessary to pose fundamental questions that go beyond the day‐to‐day disagreements on policy issues. Based on a new survey of the members of the Danish parliament, this study finds that the support for gender equality is not just a matter of lip service insofar as few MPs hold traditionalist views on women. However, the study reveals conflicting perceptions, left‐right cleavages and gender gaps, sometimes also within the parties. A new discourse is identified, supported by a large minority that includes all of the male MPs from the four right‐wing parties; this minority considers gender equality to be a ‘closed case’ – that is, as having by and large been achieved. This may provide clues to the puzzle of the stagnation in gender equality reforms in spite of the general support for ‘gender equality’. The article discusses the possible connection between the ‘closed case’ discourse, present neoliberal trends in society and the recent construction of gender equality as an ‘intrinsic Danish value’ – an argument familiar in other countries with a harsh debate over immigration.

AB - Despite almost unanimous adherence to the principle of gender equality in contemporary Denmark, a society with a long historical record of gender equality policies and almost 40 percent women in parliament, are there still divergences to be found among the members of parliament concerning gender equality principles and policies? This article argues that in order to identify underlying cleavages it is necessary to pose fundamental questions that go beyond the day‐to‐day disagreements on policy issues. Based on a new survey of the members of the Danish parliament, this study finds that the support for gender equality is not just a matter of lip service insofar as few MPs hold traditionalist views on women. However, the study reveals conflicting perceptions, left‐right cleavages and gender gaps, sometimes also within the parties. A new discourse is identified, supported by a large minority that includes all of the male MPs from the four right‐wing parties; this minority considers gender equality to be a ‘closed case’ – that is, as having by and large been achieved. This may provide clues to the puzzle of the stagnation in gender equality reforms in spite of the general support for ‘gender equality’. The article discusses the possible connection between the ‘closed case’ discourse, present neoliberal trends in society and the recent construction of gender equality as an ‘intrinsic Danish value’ – an argument familiar in other countries with a harsh debate over immigration.

KW - gender equality

KW - parliamentary survey

KW - closed case

U2 - 10.1111/1467-9477.12116

DO - 10.1111/1467-9477.12116

M3 - Journal article

VL - 41

SP - 188

EP - 209

JO - Scandinavian Political Studies

JF - Scandinavian Political Studies

SN - 0080-6757

IS - 2

ER -