Legitimation as justification

Foregrounding public philosophies in explanations of gradual ideational change

Bidragets oversatte titel: Legitimering som retfærdiggørelse: Fremhævelsen af offentlige filosofier i forklaringer af gradvise idémæssige forandringer

Magnus Paulsen Hansen, Martin B. Carstensen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

In accounts of institutional change, discursive institutionalists point to the role of economic and political ideas in upending institutional stability and providing the raw material for the establishment of a new institutional setup. This approach has typically entailed a conceptualization of ideas as coherent and monolithic and actors as almost automatically following the precepts of the ideas they hold and support. Recent theorizing stresses how ideas are in fact composite and heterogeneous, and actors pragmatic and strategic in how they employ ideas in political struggles. However, this change of focus has until recently not included how foundational ideas of a polity, often referred to as 'public philosophies', are theorized to impact on institution building. Drawing on French Pragmatic Sociology, and taking as a starting point recent efforts within discursive institutionalism to conceptualize the dynamic nature of public philosophies, this paper seeks to foreground moral justification in accounts of ideational and institutional change. It suggests that public philosophies are reflexively used by actors in continual processes of normative justification that may over time produce significant policy shifts. The empirical relevance of the argument is demonstrated through an analysis of gradual ideational and institutional change in French labour market policy, specifically the development from the state-guaranteed minimum income scheme of 1988 to the neoliberal make-work-pay logic of the 2009 scheme, Revenu de solidarité active. The analysis shows that public and moral justifications have underpinned and gradually shaped these radical changes.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEuropean Journal of Political Research
Vol/bind58
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)582-602
ISSN0304-4130
StatusUdgivet - 1 maj 2019

Emneord

  • idéer
  • Legitimitet
  • Frankrig
  • arbejdsmarkedspolitik
  • Reform

Citer dette

@article{3b9440b05b8f4899b38492f7c238f2b5,
title = "Legitimation as justification: Foregrounding public philosophies in explanations of gradual ideational change",
abstract = "In accounts of institutional change, discursive institutionalists point to the role of economic and political ideas in upending institutional stability and providing the raw material for the establishment of a new institutional setup. This approach has typically entailed a conceptualisation of ideas as coherent and monolithic and actors as almost automatically following the precepts of the ideas they hold and support. Recent theorising stresses how ideas are in fact composite and heterogeneous, and actors pragmatic and strategic in how they employ ideas in political struggles. However, this change of focus has, until recently, not included how foundational ideas of a polity, often referred to as ‘public philosophies’, are theorised to impact on institution‐building. Drawing on French Pragmatic Sociology, and taking as a starting point recent efforts within discursive institutionalism to conceptualise the dynamic nature of public philosophies, this article seeks to foreground moral justification in accounts of ideational and institutional change. It suggests that public philosophies are reflexively used by actors in continual processes of normative justification that may produce significant policy shifts over time. The empirical relevance of the argument is demonstrated through an analysis of gradual ideational and institutional change in French labour market policy, specifically the development from the state‐guaranteed minimum income scheme of 1988 to the neoliberal make‐work‐pay logic of the 2009 scheme, Revenu de solidarit{\'e} active. The analysis shows that public and moral justifications have underpinned and gradually shaped these radical changes.",
keywords = "id{\'e}er, Legitimitet, Frankrig, arbejdsmarkedspolitik, Reform, ideas, labour market policy, France, legitimacy, reforms",
author = "Hansen, {Magnus Paulsen} and Carstensen, {Martin B.}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "582--602",
journal = "European Journal of Political Research",
issn = "0304-4130",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Legitimation as justification : Foregrounding public philosophies in explanations of gradual ideational change. / Hansen, Magnus Paulsen; Carstensen, Martin B.

I: European Journal of Political Research, Bind 58, Nr. 2, 01.05.2019, s. 582-602.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legitimation as justification

T2 - Foregrounding public philosophies in explanations of gradual ideational change

AU - Hansen, Magnus Paulsen

AU - Carstensen, Martin B.

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - In accounts of institutional change, discursive institutionalists point to the role of economic and political ideas in upending institutional stability and providing the raw material for the establishment of a new institutional setup. This approach has typically entailed a conceptualisation of ideas as coherent and monolithic and actors as almost automatically following the precepts of the ideas they hold and support. Recent theorising stresses how ideas are in fact composite and heterogeneous, and actors pragmatic and strategic in how they employ ideas in political struggles. However, this change of focus has, until recently, not included how foundational ideas of a polity, often referred to as ‘public philosophies’, are theorised to impact on institution‐building. Drawing on French Pragmatic Sociology, and taking as a starting point recent efforts within discursive institutionalism to conceptualise the dynamic nature of public philosophies, this article seeks to foreground moral justification in accounts of ideational and institutional change. It suggests that public philosophies are reflexively used by actors in continual processes of normative justification that may produce significant policy shifts over time. The empirical relevance of the argument is demonstrated through an analysis of gradual ideational and institutional change in French labour market policy, specifically the development from the state‐guaranteed minimum income scheme of 1988 to the neoliberal make‐work‐pay logic of the 2009 scheme, Revenu de solidarité active. The analysis shows that public and moral justifications have underpinned and gradually shaped these radical changes.

AB - In accounts of institutional change, discursive institutionalists point to the role of economic and political ideas in upending institutional stability and providing the raw material for the establishment of a new institutional setup. This approach has typically entailed a conceptualisation of ideas as coherent and monolithic and actors as almost automatically following the precepts of the ideas they hold and support. Recent theorising stresses how ideas are in fact composite and heterogeneous, and actors pragmatic and strategic in how they employ ideas in political struggles. However, this change of focus has, until recently, not included how foundational ideas of a polity, often referred to as ‘public philosophies’, are theorised to impact on institution‐building. Drawing on French Pragmatic Sociology, and taking as a starting point recent efforts within discursive institutionalism to conceptualise the dynamic nature of public philosophies, this article seeks to foreground moral justification in accounts of ideational and institutional change. It suggests that public philosophies are reflexively used by actors in continual processes of normative justification that may produce significant policy shifts over time. The empirical relevance of the argument is demonstrated through an analysis of gradual ideational and institutional change in French labour market policy, specifically the development from the state‐guaranteed minimum income scheme of 1988 to the neoliberal make‐work‐pay logic of the 2009 scheme, Revenu de solidarité active. The analysis shows that public and moral justifications have underpinned and gradually shaped these radical changes.

KW - idéer

KW - Legitimitet

KW - Frankrig

KW - arbejdsmarkedspolitik

KW - Reform

KW - ideas

KW - labour market policy

KW - France

KW - legitimacy

KW - reforms

UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1475-6765.12302

M3 - Journal article

VL - 58

SP - 582

EP - 602

JO - European Journal of Political Research

JF - European Journal of Political Research

SN - 0304-4130

IS - 2

ER -