Laborde’s religion

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Cécile Laborde’s Liberalism’s Religion proposes liberal principles to address political controversies over religion. One is the public reason requirement that reasons for state policies should be accessible. Another is the civic inclusiveness requirement according to which symbolic religious establishment is wrong when it communicates that religious identity is a component of civic identity. A third is the claim that liberal states have meta-jurisdictional authority to settle the boundary between what counts as religion and what counts as non-religion. The article considers whether Laborde has managed to articulate these three principles in a way that is operationalisable and can serve to provide solutions to practical controversies over religion. It is argued that Laborde’s formulations leave important issues open, and some ways of settling these issues are considered.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Vol/bind23
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)9-20
Antal sider12
ISSN1369-8230
StatusUdgivet - 10 jan. 2020

Emneord

  • Inklusion
  • liberalisme
  • offentlighed
  • religion
  • suverænitet

Citer dette

@article{eaf8b35c9de54465975a16c34b5978e5,
title = "Laborde’s religion",
abstract = "C{\'e}cile Laborde’s Liberalism’s Religion proposes liberal principles to address political controversies over religion. One is the public reason requirement that reasons for state policies should be accessible. Another is the civic inclusiveness requirement according to which symbolic religious establishment is wrong when it communicates that religious identity is a component of civic identity. A third is the claim that liberal states have meta-jurisdictional authority to settle the boundary between what counts as religion and what counts as non-religion. The article considers whether Laborde has managed to articulate these three principles in a way that is operationalisable and can serve to provide solutions to practical controversies over religion. It is argued that Laborde’s formulations leave important issues open, and some ways of settling these issues are considered.",
keywords = "Inklusion, liberalisme, offentlighed, religion, suver{\ae}nitet, civic inclusion, Religion, public reason, Liberalism, Sovereignty",
author = "Sune L{\ae}gaard",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "9--20",
journal = "Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy",
issn = "1369-8230",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Laborde’s religion. / Lægaard, Sune.

I: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Bind 23, Nr. 1, 10.01.2020, s. 9-20.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laborde’s religion

AU - Lægaard, Sune

PY - 2020/1/10

Y1 - 2020/1/10

N2 - Cécile Laborde’s Liberalism’s Religion proposes liberal principles to address political controversies over religion. One is the public reason requirement that reasons for state policies should be accessible. Another is the civic inclusiveness requirement according to which symbolic religious establishment is wrong when it communicates that religious identity is a component of civic identity. A third is the claim that liberal states have meta-jurisdictional authority to settle the boundary between what counts as religion and what counts as non-religion. The article considers whether Laborde has managed to articulate these three principles in a way that is operationalisable and can serve to provide solutions to practical controversies over religion. It is argued that Laborde’s formulations leave important issues open, and some ways of settling these issues are considered.

AB - Cécile Laborde’s Liberalism’s Religion proposes liberal principles to address political controversies over religion. One is the public reason requirement that reasons for state policies should be accessible. Another is the civic inclusiveness requirement according to which symbolic religious establishment is wrong when it communicates that religious identity is a component of civic identity. A third is the claim that liberal states have meta-jurisdictional authority to settle the boundary between what counts as religion and what counts as non-religion. The article considers whether Laborde has managed to articulate these three principles in a way that is operationalisable and can serve to provide solutions to practical controversies over religion. It is argued that Laborde’s formulations leave important issues open, and some ways of settling these issues are considered.

KW - Inklusion

KW - liberalisme

KW - offentlighed

KW - religion

KW - suverænitet

KW - civic inclusion

KW - Religion

KW - public reason

KW - Liberalism

KW - Sovereignty

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 9

EP - 20

JO - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy

JF - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy

SN - 1369-8230

IS - 1

ER -