Konflikt og samarbejde mellem ressourcepersoner og lærere om inklusion

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

The article presents analyses from an empirical study on the work of a ‘Team for Inclusion’ in a Danish primary school. The aim is to illustrate how the daily work of ‘resource teachers’ can be characterized by dilemmas. The article highlights that these dilemmas are connected to the ways structural conditions constitute possibilities and constraints for inclusive education. But often these dilemmas are played out as personal conflicts between “general teachers” and "resource teachers" as they have different perspectives on possibilities and constraints for inclusive education. With ‘consensus’ and ‘togetherness’ as ideals for collaboration, differences of perspective are understood as ‘resistance’ and related to specific teachers as problematic.
Drawing on Erik Axel, among others, the article builds on an understanding of collaboration as conflictual cooperation. In this understanding conflicts between ‘resource teachers’ and ‘general teachers’ are not necessarily mistakes but related to differences in tasks, responsibilities, knowledge, possibilities.
OriginalsprogDansk
TidsskriftPædagogisk Psykologisk Tidsskrift
Vol/bind52
Udgave nummer5/6
Sider (fra-til)67-80
StatusUdgivet - 2015

Emneord

  • PPR, ressourcepersoner, folkeskolen inklusion

Citer dette

@article{a9d184dd1ff94ee08442d16d6c5f891e,
title = "Konflikt og samarbejde mellem ressourcepersoner og l{\ae}rere om inklusion",
abstract = "The article presents analyses from an empirical study on the work of a ‘Team for Inclusion’ in a Danish primary school. The aim is to illustrate how the daily work of ‘resource teachers’ can be characterized by dilemmas. The article highlights that these dilemmas are connected to the ways structural conditions constitute possibilities and constraints for inclusive education. But often these dilemmas are played out as personal conflicts between “general teachers” and {"}resource teachers{"} as they have different perspectives on possibilities and constraints for inclusive education. With ‘consensus’ and ‘togetherness’ as ideals for collaboration, differences of perspective are understood as ‘resistance’ and related to specific teachers as problematic. Drawing on Erik Axel, among others, the article builds on an understanding of collaboration as conflictual cooperation. In this understanding conflicts between ‘resource teachers’ and ‘general teachers’ are not necessarily mistakes but related to differences in tasks, responsibilities, knowledge, possibilities.",
keywords = "PPR, ressourcepersoner, folkeskolen inklusion",
author = "Tilde Mardahl-Hansen",
year = "2015",
language = "Dansk",
volume = "52",
pages = "67--80",
journal = "P{\ae}dagogisk Psykologisk Tidsskrift",
publisher = "Dansk Psykologisk Forlag",
number = "5/6",

}

Konflikt og samarbejde mellem ressourcepersoner og lærere om inklusion. / Mardahl-Hansen, Tilde.

I: Pædagogisk Psykologisk Tidsskrift, Bind 52 , Nr. 5/6, 2015, s. 67-80.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Konflikt og samarbejde mellem ressourcepersoner og lærere om inklusion

AU - Mardahl-Hansen, Tilde

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The article presents analyses from an empirical study on the work of a ‘Team for Inclusion’ in a Danish primary school. The aim is to illustrate how the daily work of ‘resource teachers’ can be characterized by dilemmas. The article highlights that these dilemmas are connected to the ways structural conditions constitute possibilities and constraints for inclusive education. But often these dilemmas are played out as personal conflicts between “general teachers” and "resource teachers" as they have different perspectives on possibilities and constraints for inclusive education. With ‘consensus’ and ‘togetherness’ as ideals for collaboration, differences of perspective are understood as ‘resistance’ and related to specific teachers as problematic. Drawing on Erik Axel, among others, the article builds on an understanding of collaboration as conflictual cooperation. In this understanding conflicts between ‘resource teachers’ and ‘general teachers’ are not necessarily mistakes but related to differences in tasks, responsibilities, knowledge, possibilities.

AB - The article presents analyses from an empirical study on the work of a ‘Team for Inclusion’ in a Danish primary school. The aim is to illustrate how the daily work of ‘resource teachers’ can be characterized by dilemmas. The article highlights that these dilemmas are connected to the ways structural conditions constitute possibilities and constraints for inclusive education. But often these dilemmas are played out as personal conflicts between “general teachers” and "resource teachers" as they have different perspectives on possibilities and constraints for inclusive education. With ‘consensus’ and ‘togetherness’ as ideals for collaboration, differences of perspective are understood as ‘resistance’ and related to specific teachers as problematic. Drawing on Erik Axel, among others, the article builds on an understanding of collaboration as conflictual cooperation. In this understanding conflicts between ‘resource teachers’ and ‘general teachers’ are not necessarily mistakes but related to differences in tasks, responsibilities, knowledge, possibilities.

KW - PPR, ressourcepersoner, folkeskolen inklusion

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - 52

SP - 67

EP - 80

JO - Pædagogisk Psykologisk Tidsskrift

JF - Pædagogisk Psykologisk Tidsskrift

IS - 5/6

ER -