TY - GEN
T1 - Isoadvector
T2 - 11th Open Field Operation And Manipulation Workshop, OpenFOAM 2016
AU - Roenby, Johan
AU - Bredmose, Henrik
AU - Jasak, Hrvoje
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - In a recent publication, we presented a novel geometric VOF interface advection algorithm, denoted isoAdvector (Roenby et al. in R Soc Open Sci 3:160405 2016, [1]). The OpenFOAM® implementation of the method was publicly released to allow for more accurate and efficient two-phase flow simulations in OpenFOAM® (Roenby in isoAdvector www.github.com/isoadvector, [2]). In the present paper, we give a brief outline of the isoAdvector method and test it with two pure advection cases. We show how to modify interFoam so as to use isoAdvector as an alternative to the currently implemented MULES limited interface compression method. The properties of the new solver are tested with two simple interfacial flow cases, namely the damBreak case and a steady stream function wave. We find that the new solver is superior at keeping the interface sharp, but also that the sharper interface exacerbates the well-known spurious velocities in the air phase close to an air–water interface. To fully benefit from the accuracy of isoAdvector, there is a need to modify the pressure–velocity coupling algorithm of interFoam, so it more consistently takes into account the jump in fluid density at the interface. In our future research, we aim to solve this problem by exploiting the subcell information provided by isoAdvector.
AB - In a recent publication, we presented a novel geometric VOF interface advection algorithm, denoted isoAdvector (Roenby et al. in R Soc Open Sci 3:160405 2016, [1]). The OpenFOAM® implementation of the method was publicly released to allow for more accurate and efficient two-phase flow simulations in OpenFOAM® (Roenby in isoAdvector www.github.com/isoadvector, [2]). In the present paper, we give a brief outline of the isoAdvector method and test it with two pure advection cases. We show how to modify interFoam so as to use isoAdvector as an alternative to the currently implemented MULES limited interface compression method. The properties of the new solver are tested with two simple interfacial flow cases, namely the damBreak case and a steady stream function wave. We find that the new solver is superior at keeping the interface sharp, but also that the sharper interface exacerbates the well-known spurious velocities in the air phase close to an air–water interface. To fully benefit from the accuracy of isoAdvector, there is a need to modify the pressure–velocity coupling algorithm of interFoam, so it more consistently takes into account the jump in fluid density at the interface. In our future research, we aim to solve this problem by exploiting the subcell information provided by isoAdvector.
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-60846-4_21
DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-60846-4_21
M3 - Article in proceedings
AN - SCOPUS:85067270716
SN - 9783319608457
T3 - OpenFOAM - Selected Papers of the 11th Workshop
SP - 281
EP - 296
BT - OpenFOAM - Selected Papers of the 11th Workshop
A2 - Miguel Nóbrega, Joao
A2 - Jasak, Hrvoje
A2 - Jasak, Hrvoje
PB - Springer
Y2 - 26 June 2016 through 30 June 2016
ER -