Is contracting out good or bad for employees?

A systematic review of international experience

Karsten Vrangbæk, Ole Helby Petersen, Ulf Hjelmar

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    The past decades have witnessed an upsurge in governments’ use of contracting out as a means of reforming and privatizing public service delivery. This development has to a large extent been driven by efficiency and cost-effectiveness concerns, but may also result in important changes in the working conditions and work environment for the personnel in public organizations. In this article, we present the findings from a systematic review of studies documenting the consequences of contracting out for employees. The review is based on 26 empirical studies published between 2000 and 2012. We find both positive and negative effects for employees documented in the literature, although with a predominance of negative effects, including reductions in the workforce and other changes in the workforce composition such as the replacement of experienced employees with younger workers, poorer working conditions, lower salaries, fewer benefits, and reduced job satisfaction. We conclude that poorer conditions for the public service personnel are well documented as a short-term consequence of contracting out, while more studies covering a longer time-span are needed to assess whether the predominantly negative effects are transitory or will persist over time.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftReview of Public Personnel Administration
    Vol/bind35
    Udgave nummer1
    Sider (fra-til)3-23
    ISSN0734-371X
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 2015

    Citer dette

    @article{48312459e5c74a9c9cbbf75fdcf624da,
    title = "Is contracting out good or bad for employees?: A systematic review of international experience",
    abstract = "The past decades have witnessed an upsurge in governments’ use of contracting out as a means of reforming and privatizing public service delivery. This development has to a large extent been driven by efficiency and cost-effectiveness concerns, but may also result in important changes in the working conditions and work environment for the personnel in public organizations. In this article, we present the findings from a systematic review of studies documenting the consequences of contracting out for employees. The review is based on 26 empirical studies published between 2000 and 2012. We find both positive and negative effects for employees documented in the literature, although with a predominance of negative effects, including reductions in the workforce and other changes in the workforce composition such as the replacement of experienced employees with younger workers, poorer working conditions, lower salaries, fewer benefits, and reduced job satisfaction. We conclude that poorer conditions for the public service personnel are well documented as a short-term consequence of contracting out, while more studies covering a longer time-span are needed to assess whether the predominantly negative effects are transitory or will persist over time.",
    author = "Karsten Vrangb{\ae}k and Petersen, {Ole Helby} and Ulf Hjelmar",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1177/0734371X13511087",
    language = "English",
    volume = "35",
    pages = "3--23",
    journal = "Review of Public Personnel Administration",
    issn = "0734-371X",
    publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
    number = "1",

    }

    Is contracting out good or bad for employees? A systematic review of international experience. / Vrangbæk, Karsten; Petersen, Ole Helby; Hjelmar, Ulf.

    I: Review of Public Personnel Administration, Bind 35, Nr. 1, 2015, s. 3-23.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Is contracting out good or bad for employees?

    T2 - A systematic review of international experience

    AU - Vrangbæk, Karsten

    AU - Petersen, Ole Helby

    AU - Hjelmar, Ulf

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - The past decades have witnessed an upsurge in governments’ use of contracting out as a means of reforming and privatizing public service delivery. This development has to a large extent been driven by efficiency and cost-effectiveness concerns, but may also result in important changes in the working conditions and work environment for the personnel in public organizations. In this article, we present the findings from a systematic review of studies documenting the consequences of contracting out for employees. The review is based on 26 empirical studies published between 2000 and 2012. We find both positive and negative effects for employees documented in the literature, although with a predominance of negative effects, including reductions in the workforce and other changes in the workforce composition such as the replacement of experienced employees with younger workers, poorer working conditions, lower salaries, fewer benefits, and reduced job satisfaction. We conclude that poorer conditions for the public service personnel are well documented as a short-term consequence of contracting out, while more studies covering a longer time-span are needed to assess whether the predominantly negative effects are transitory or will persist over time.

    AB - The past decades have witnessed an upsurge in governments’ use of contracting out as a means of reforming and privatizing public service delivery. This development has to a large extent been driven by efficiency and cost-effectiveness concerns, but may also result in important changes in the working conditions and work environment for the personnel in public organizations. In this article, we present the findings from a systematic review of studies documenting the consequences of contracting out for employees. The review is based on 26 empirical studies published between 2000 and 2012. We find both positive and negative effects for employees documented in the literature, although with a predominance of negative effects, including reductions in the workforce and other changes in the workforce composition such as the replacement of experienced employees with younger workers, poorer working conditions, lower salaries, fewer benefits, and reduced job satisfaction. We conclude that poorer conditions for the public service personnel are well documented as a short-term consequence of contracting out, while more studies covering a longer time-span are needed to assess whether the predominantly negative effects are transitory or will persist over time.

    U2 - 10.1177/0734371X13511087

    DO - 10.1177/0734371X13511087

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 35

    SP - 3

    EP - 23

    JO - Review of Public Personnel Administration

    JF - Review of Public Personnel Administration

    SN - 0734-371X

    IS - 1

    ER -