In(ter)dependent lives

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This article suggests it is important to confront independence, one of the key concepts of our time, with empirical analysis of how this is actually practised by individuals in their everyday life. Within social politics, the cash-for-care system is seen as a notable tool of independence because people receive cash instead of care in order to employ their own care workers. Using a cross-national case study of cash-for-care for disabled people in the UK and Norway the present article points at two different social political interpretations of independence and suggests that neither of them lead to independence in terms of control and that assistance without care is impossible. A narrative analysis rather reveals that the cultural narrative about independence can be in disharmony with disabled people's personal narratives about limited control and care and that this should lead to a replacement of the idea of independence with the praxis of interdependence.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftScandinavian Journal of Disability Research
Vol/bind11
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)117-130
ISSN1501-7419
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2009
Udgivet eksterntJa

Emneord

  • Independence
  • Interdependence
  • Cash-for-care
  • Disabled people

Citer dette

@article{ccd59370f18040dba28486d419e792a0,
title = "In(ter)dependent lives",
abstract = "This article suggests it is important to confront independence, one of the key concepts of our time, with empirical analysis of how this is actually practised by individuals in their everyday life. Within social politics, the cash-for-care system is seen as a notable tool of independence because people receive cash instead of care in order to employ their own care workers. Using a cross-national case study of cash-for-care for disabled people in the UK and Norway the present article points at two different social political interpretations of independence and suggests that neither of them lead to independence in terms of control and that assistance without care is impossible. A narrative analysis rather reveals that the cultural narrative about independence can be in disharmony with disabled people's personal narratives about limited control and care and that this should lead to a replacement of the idea of independence with the praxis of interdependence.",
keywords = "Independence, Interdependence, Cash-for-care, Disabled people",
author = "Karen Christensen",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/15017410902830553",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "117--130",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research",
issn = "1501-7419",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Scandinavia",
number = "2",

}

In(ter)dependent lives. / Christensen, Karen.

I: Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, Bind 11, Nr. 2, 2009, s. 117-130.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - In(ter)dependent lives

AU - Christensen, Karen

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - This article suggests it is important to confront independence, one of the key concepts of our time, with empirical analysis of how this is actually practised by individuals in their everyday life. Within social politics, the cash-for-care system is seen as a notable tool of independence because people receive cash instead of care in order to employ their own care workers. Using a cross-national case study of cash-for-care for disabled people in the UK and Norway the present article points at two different social political interpretations of independence and suggests that neither of them lead to independence in terms of control and that assistance without care is impossible. A narrative analysis rather reveals that the cultural narrative about independence can be in disharmony with disabled people's personal narratives about limited control and care and that this should lead to a replacement of the idea of independence with the praxis of interdependence.

AB - This article suggests it is important to confront independence, one of the key concepts of our time, with empirical analysis of how this is actually practised by individuals in their everyday life. Within social politics, the cash-for-care system is seen as a notable tool of independence because people receive cash instead of care in order to employ their own care workers. Using a cross-national case study of cash-for-care for disabled people in the UK and Norway the present article points at two different social political interpretations of independence and suggests that neither of them lead to independence in terms of control and that assistance without care is impossible. A narrative analysis rather reveals that the cultural narrative about independence can be in disharmony with disabled people's personal narratives about limited control and care and that this should lead to a replacement of the idea of independence with the praxis of interdependence.

KW - Independence

KW - Interdependence

KW - Cash-for-care

KW - Disabled people

U2 - 10.1080/15017410902830553

DO - 10.1080/15017410902830553

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

SP - 117

EP - 130

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research

SN - 1501-7419

IS - 2

ER -