TY - JOUR
T1 - Inequalities in access to neuro-oncology supportive care and rehabilitation
T2 - A survey of healthcare professionals’ perspectives
AU - on behalf of the Nurse and Allied Health Professionals Committee and the Disparity and Inclusion Committee of EANO
AU - Boele, Florien
AU - Rosenlund, Lena
AU - Nordentoft, Sara
AU - Melhuish, Sara
AU - Nicklin, Emma
AU - Rydén, Isabelle
AU - Williamson, Aoife
AU - Donders-Kamphuis, Marike
AU - Preusser, Matthias
AU - Rhun, Emilie Le
AU - Kiesel, Barbara
AU - Minniti, Giuseppe
AU - Furtner, Julia
AU - Dirven, Linda
AU - Taphoorn, Martin
AU - Galldiks, Norbert
AU - Rudà, Roberta
AU - Chalmers, Anthony
AU - Short, Susan C.
AU - Piil, Karin
PY - 2024/8/1
Y1 - 2024/8/1
N2 - Background. Neuro-oncology patients and caregivers should have equitable access to rehabilitation, supportive-, and palliative care. To investigate existing issues and potential solutions, we surveyed neuro-oncology professionals to explore current barriers and facilitators to screening patients’ needs and referral to services. Methods. Members of the European Association of Neuro-Oncology and the European Organisation for Research andTreatment of Cancer BrainTumor Group (EORTC-BTG) were invited to complete a 39-item online questionnaire covering the availability of services, screening, and referral practice. Responses were analyzed descriptively; associations between sociodemographic/clinical variables and screening/referral practice were explored. Results. In total, 103 participants completed the survey (67% women and 57% medical doctors). Fifteen professions from 23 countries were represented. Various rehabilitation, supportive-, and palliative care services were available yet rated “inadequate” by 21–37% of participants. Most respondents with a clinical role (n = 94) declare to screen (78%) and to refer (83%) their patients routinely for physical/cognitive/emotional issues. Survey completers (n = 103) indicated the main reasons for not screening/referring were (1) lack of suitable referral options (50%); (2) shortage of healthcare professionals (48%); and (3) long waiting lists (42%).To improve service provision, respondents suggested there is a need for education about neuro-oncology-specific issues (75%), improving the availability of services (65%) and staff (64%), developing international guidelines (64%), and strengthening the existing evidence-base for rehabilitation (60%). Conclusions. Detecting and managing neuro-oncology patients’ and caregivers’ rehabilitation, supportive,- and palliative care needs can be improved. Better international collaboration can help address healthcare disparities.
AB - Background. Neuro-oncology patients and caregivers should have equitable access to rehabilitation, supportive-, and palliative care. To investigate existing issues and potential solutions, we surveyed neuro-oncology professionals to explore current barriers and facilitators to screening patients’ needs and referral to services. Methods. Members of the European Association of Neuro-Oncology and the European Organisation for Research andTreatment of Cancer BrainTumor Group (EORTC-BTG) were invited to complete a 39-item online questionnaire covering the availability of services, screening, and referral practice. Responses were analyzed descriptively; associations between sociodemographic/clinical variables and screening/referral practice were explored. Results. In total, 103 participants completed the survey (67% women and 57% medical doctors). Fifteen professions from 23 countries were represented. Various rehabilitation, supportive-, and palliative care services were available yet rated “inadequate” by 21–37% of participants. Most respondents with a clinical role (n = 94) declare to screen (78%) and to refer (83%) their patients routinely for physical/cognitive/emotional issues. Survey completers (n = 103) indicated the main reasons for not screening/referring were (1) lack of suitable referral options (50%); (2) shortage of healthcare professionals (48%); and (3) long waiting lists (42%).To improve service provision, respondents suggested there is a need for education about neuro-oncology-specific issues (75%), improving the availability of services (65%) and staff (64%), developing international guidelines (64%), and strengthening the existing evidence-base for rehabilitation (60%). Conclusions. Detecting and managing neuro-oncology patients’ and caregivers’ rehabilitation, supportive,- and palliative care needs can be improved. Better international collaboration can help address healthcare disparities.
KW - brain tumor
KW - disparity
KW - inequalities
KW - rehabilitation
KW - supportive/palliative care
KW - Brain tumor
KW - Disparity
KW - Inequalities
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - supportive/palliative care
U2 - 10.1093/nop/npae023
DO - 10.1093/nop/npae023
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85198660639
SN - 2054-2577
VL - 11
SP - 484
EP - 493
JO - Neuro-Oncology Practice
JF - Neuro-Oncology Practice
IS - 4
ER -